Introduction Atherosclerotic plaque healing is a dynamic process that promotes plaque repair after destabilization. Previous studies showed that healed plaques are more common in patients with chronic coronary syndrome than in those with acute coronary syndrome, suggesting that they might be a marker of clinical stability. The mechanisms underlying plaque healing are not completely understood. The aim of the present study was to evaluate sex-based differences in plaque phenotype and healing of non-culprit coronary lesions by optical coherence tomography. Methods In this observational, single-center cohort study, we enrolled patients from the OCT Registry of the Fondazione Policlinico A Gemelli IRCCS. A total of 205 patients with both acute coronary syndromes or chronic coronary syndromes undergoing coronary angiography and intravascular OCT imaging of non-culprit vessels were included in the analysis and divided into two groups according to gender. Results Of 205 patients, 153 were male (75%) and 52 (25%) female. Compared with male patients, female patients had lower prevalence of lipid-rich plaque (40.4% vs. 57.7%; p=0.030), plaque rupture (7.7% vs. 21.2%; p=0.028) and cholesterol crystal (13.5% vs. 29.5%; p=0.022). Mean lipid arc and calcium depht were significantly lower in female patients than in male ones (118.0° ± 79.9° vs. 135.5° ± 77.9°; p=0.011; and 52.7 µm ± 79.2 µm vs. 72.3 µm ± 93.5 µm; p=0.007) while fibrous cap tended to be thicker (108.2 µm ± 70.4 µm vs. 96.2 µm ± 72.9 µm; p=0.055). Healed plaques were significantly more frequent in female patients than in male patients (51.9% vs 34.6%; p = 0.027). The prevalence of fibrous plaque, thrombi, neovascularization, diffuse calcifications and spotty calcification was not different between the two groups. Conclusion Females have a distinct atherosclerotic phenotype and healing capacity compared with male patients, including lower prevalence of lipid-rich plaque, cholesterol crystals and plaque ruptures and higher prevalence of healed plaques in non-culprit coronary lesions.

Background Phrenic nerve stimulation is a well-recognized complication related to cardiac implantable electronic devices, in particular with left ventricular coronary sinus pacing leads for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Case presentation We report an unusual case of symptomatic phrenic nerve stimulation due to inadvertent placement of a right ventricular defibrillation lead in coronary sinus posterior branch in a patient with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with a recently implanted single-chamber cardioverter defibrillator. Discussion Phrenic nerve stimulation is a relatively common complication of left ventricular pacing. Inadvertent placement of a right ventricular lead in a coronary sinus branch is a rare but possible cause of phrenic nerve stimulation. Careful evaluation of intraprocedural fluoroscopic and electrocardiographic appearance of pacing and defibrillation leads during implantation may prevent inadvertent placement of a right ventricular lead in the coronary sinus.

No abstract

Aims Atherosclerotic plaque healing is a dynamic process developing after plaque rupture or erosion, which aims to prevent lasting occlusive thrombus formation and to promote plaque repair. We hypothesized that diabetes mellitus, one of the major conventional cardiovascular risk factors, may influence the healing capacity after plaque destabilization. Methods and results In this single-centre observational cohort study, patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) who underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging at Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli–IRCCS, Rome, were included. Patients were divided into two groups (i.e. diabetes vs. no diabetes), and stratified based on diabetes medications (i.e. insulin, vs. oral antidiabetic drugs). OCT analysis of non-culprit coronary segments was performed. 105 patients were included (44 diabetes, 61 no diabetes). Prevalence of HCPs was not significantly different between patients with and without diabetes (3.6% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.854). However, patients with diabetes on insulin showed a lower prevalence of HCPs both at patient-based (7.1% vs. 26.4%, P = 0.116) and at segment-based analysis (1.2% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.020). When comparing HbA1c levels based on the presence or absence of healed plaque at the non-culprit lesions, patients with healed plaque showed significantly lower levels of HbA1c compared to patients without healed plaques (43.5 ± 12.1% vs. 61.2 ± 10.4%, P < 0.001). At segment-based analysis, normal vessel structure, pathological intimal thickening (PIT), and spotty calcifications were significantly less prevalent in diabetic patients (2.1% vs. 5.1%, P = 0.001; 7.2% vs. 9.5%, P = 0.05; 9.9% vs. 13.6%, P = 0.02, respectively), whereas neovascularization was significantly higher (19.2% vs. 15.6%, P = 0.035). Conclusions Patients with diabetes have a distinct coronary non-culprit plaque phenotype. Healing capacity may be impaired in patients with advanced diabetes on insulin therapy and in those with a suboptimal control of the disease. Further prospective, larger scale studies are warranted to confirm these findings.