The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of baroreceptor unloading on the sensitivity of the cardiovagal and sympathetic arms of the baroreflex during upright posture. Beat‐by‐beat R‐R interval, arterial blood pressure and cardiac output (Doppler ultrasound), as well as muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) were recorded during periods in supine (Supine) and 60 deg head‐up tilt (HUT) positions (n = 8 volunteers). Cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) was measured by the spontaneous sequence analysis method using systolic blood pressure and R‐R interval, while sympathetic BRS was determined using the slope of the linear relationship between decreasing segments of diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and corresponding increases in MSNA. On changing to HUT, mean R‐R interval and cardiac output decreased, while mean measures of MSNA, DBP and total peripheral resistance increased (P < 0.05). Cardiovagal BRS decreased from Supine to 60 deg HUT (19 ± 2 ms mmHg−1 versus 7.6 ± 1.2 ms mmHg−1; P < 0.01). In contrast, sympathetic BRS increased from ‐6.1 ± 1.4 a.u. mmHg−1 in Supine to ‐14 ± 2 a.u. mmHg−1 in HUT (P < 0.01). Thus, HUT produced differential effects on cardiac versus sympathetic BRS. The data suggest that dynamic baroreflex‐mediated cardiovascular control is dominated by sympathetic control during baroreceptor unloading.

In this study, we tested the hypothesis that carotid arteries undergo rapid changes in distensibility on moving from the supine to head-up tilt (HUT) postures and, subsequently, that this change in carotid distensibility (cDa) might be associated with concurrent reductions in cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity (BRS). Thus the effect of posture on carotid vascular mechanics and cardiovagal BRS with consideration for altered central hemodynamics (i.e., stroke volume; Doppler ultrasound) was examined. Carotid pulse pressure (cPP; Millar transducer) and contralateral B-mode ultrasound images were assessed at the carotid artery during supine and 60 degrees HUT postures. From these measures, cDa was calculated at 5-mmHg pressure increments experienced during the cardiac cycle (n = 6). cPP (n = 9) was not different in the two postures. A smaller stroke volume being ejected into a smaller carotid artery in HUT explained the maintenance of cPP in HUT. Also, compared with supine, cDa was reset to a lower level in HUT (main effect of posture; P < 0.05). Cardiovagal BRS (sequence method) was diminished in HUT vs. supine (P < 0.05). A positive correlation was observed between the tilt-induced changes in maximal cDa (in early systole) and cardiovagal BRS (r2 = 0.75; P < 0.05), but there was little predictive relationship between changes in cPP, systolic vessel dimensions, or average cDa and the corresponding change in BRS. The present results indicate that HUT elicits rapid changes in carotid artery mechanics and further suggest that reductions in the maximal cDa measured in early systole contribute to reduced cardiovagal BRS with HUT.

Previous evidence indicates that sensitivity of the baroreflex cardiovagal and sympathetic arms is dissociated. In addition, pharmacologic assessment of baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) has revealed that cardiovagal, but not sympathetic, BRS is greater when blood pressure is increasing versus falling. The origin of this hysteresis is unknown. In this study, carotid artery distensibility and absolute distension (diameter) were assessed to test the hypothesis that vessel mechanics in barosensitive regions affect the BRS of cardiovagal, but not sympathetic, outflow. R-R interval (i.e. time between successive R waves), finger arterial blood pressure, muscle sympathetic nerve activity, and carotid artery dimensions (B-mode imaging) were measured during sequential infusions of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and phenylephrine (PHE). Systolic and diastolic common carotid artery diameters and pulse pressure were recorded to calculate distensibility of this vessel under each drug condition. Cardiovagal BRS was greater when blood pressure was increasing versus decreasing (p < 0.01). Sympathetic BRS was not affected by direction of pressure change. Distensibility did not differ between SNP and PHE injections. However, compared with SNP, infusion of PHE resulted in larger absolute systolic and diastolic carotid diameters (p < 0.001). Therefore, cardiovagal reflex hysteresis was related to drug-induced changes in common carotid artery diameter but not distensibility. The lack of sympathetic hysteresis in this model suggests a relative insensitivity of this baroreflex component to carotid artery dimensions and provides a possible mechanism for the dissociation between cardiovagal and sympathetic BRS.