This study shows the evolution of the humoral immune response from IgM to IgG DSA posttransplant. We found that development of IgM persistent IgG3 positive DSA identifies the most dangerous IgG DSA subpopulation.

Imlifidase is a cysteine proteinase which specifically cleaves IgG, inhibiting Fc‐mediated effector function within hours of administration. Imlifidase converts a positive crossmatch to a potential donor (T cell, B cell, or both), to negative, enabling transplantation to occur between previously HLA incompatible donor‐recipient pairs. To date, 39 crossmatch positive patients received imlifidase prior to a kidney transplant in four single‐arm, open‐label, phase 2 studies. At 3 years, for patients who were AMR+ compared to AMR−, death‐censored allograft survival was 93% vs 77%, patient survival was 85% vs 94%, and mean eGFR was 49 ml/min/1.73 m2 vs 61 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively. The incidence of AMR was 38% with most episodes occurring within the first month post‐transplantation. Sub‐analysis of patients deemed highly sensitized with cPRA ≥ 99.9%, and unlikely to be transplanted who received crossmatch‐positive, deceased donor transplants had similar rates of patient survival, graft survival, and eGFR but a higher rate of AMR. These data demonstrate that outcomes and safety up to 3 years in recipients of imlifidase‐enabled allografts is comparable to outcomes in other highly sensitized patients undergoing HLA‐incompatible transplantation. Thus, imlifidase is a potent option to facilitate transplantation among patients who have a significant immunologic barrier to successful kidney transplantation. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02790437), EudraCT Number: 2016‐002064‐13.

Post-transplant BKPyV viremia and preemptive immunosuppression reduction is associated with high rates of dnDSA. When preemptively treating BKPyV viremia, dnDSA should be monitored to prevent allograft consequences.

Little is known about the impact of CYP3A5 polymorphisms on transplantation outcomes among African American (AA) kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). To assess this issue, clinical outcomes were compared between AA CYP3A5*1 expressers and nonexpressers. This retrospective cohort study analyzed AA KTRs. Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), delayed graft function (DGF), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), infections, and tacrolimus dosing requirements were examined in 106 immunologically high-risk AA kidney transplant patients over a 2-year follow-up period. In CYP3A5*1 expressers compared to nonexpressers, the incidence of BPAR was significantly higher in the first 6 months (13% vs 0%; P = .016) compared to 24 months (13% vs 7%; P = .521). Tacrolimus total daily dose at first therapeutic level was significantly higher in CYP3A5*1 expressers (12 mg/day) compared to nonexpressers (8 mg/day; P < .001). Compared to CYP3A5*1 nonexpressers, DGF incidence was significantly higher among CYP3A5*1 expressers (27.6% vs 6.7%; P = .006). By contrast, median GFR was significantly higher in CYP3A5*1 expressers compared to nonexpressers (54.5 mL/min vs 50.0 mL/min; P = .003) at 24 months. The findings from this retrospective study suggest that AAs with CYP3A5*1 expression require 50% more tacrolimus and have an increased incidence of DGF and acute rejection.

Allosensitization represents one of the most formidable obstacles in transplantation. Here, an immunologic barrier prohibits access to transplantation for the most highly-HLA sensitized individuals.In 2014, a revised kidney allocation system (KAS) in the United States dramatically improved transplant rates for sensitized patients. 1 However, longer term analysis revealed that transplant rates for the most highly-HLA sensitized (calculated panel reactive antibodies [cPRA] >99.9%) were not impacted by the revised KAS and these patients were more likely to die or be removed from the list than transplanted. 2 Even within the highly sensitized, there are marked differences in transplant rates where the post-KAS transplant rate for candidates with cPRA >99.9% is six times less than that for candidates with a cPRA 99.5%-99.9% despite both groups receiving similar priority under the revised KAS. 3 This information has led to a focus on development of clinical trials for desensitization therapies aimed at this group that has not benefited from the KAS.Several reports have documented the benefits of desensitization for improving access to transplantation and enhancing long-term patient survival compared to dialysis. 4,5 However, current therapies are often incomplete, especially for those in the highest cPRA categories. Therapeutic approaches that can rapidly and durably remove