Observational studies address packed red blood cell effects at the end of shelf life and have larger sample sizes compared to randomized control trials. Meta-analyses combining data from observational studies have been complicated by differences in aggregate transfused packed red blood cell age and outcome reporting. This study abrogated these issues by taking a pooled patient data approach. Observational studies reporting packed red blood cell age and clinical outcomes were identified and patient-level data sets were sought from investigators. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for binary outcomes were calculated for each study, with mean packed red blood cell age or maximum packed red blood cell age acting as independent variables. The relationship between mean packed red blood cell age and hospital length of stay for each paper was analyzed using zero-inflated Poisson regression. Random effects models combined paper-level effect estimates. Extremes analyses were completed by comparing patients transfused with mean packed red blood cell aged less than ten days to those transfused with mean packed red blood cell aged at least 30 days. sixteen datasets were available for pooled patient data analysis. Mean packed red blood cell age of at least 30 days was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality compared to mean packed red blood cell of less than ten days (odds ratio: 3.25, 95% confidence interval: 1.27–8.29). Packed red blood cell age was not correlated to increased risks of nosocomial infection or prolonged length of hospital stay.
BackgroundRecent research has identified an increased rate of mortality associated with fluid bolus therapy for severe sepsis and septic shock, but the mechanisms are still not well understood. Fluid resuscitation therapy administered for sepsis and septic shock targets restoration of the macro-circulation, but the pathogenesis of sepsis is complex and includes microcirculatory dysfunction.ObjectiveThe objective of the study is to systematically review data comparing the effects of different types of fluid resuscitation on the microcirculation in clinically relevant animal models of lipopolysaccharide-induced sepsis.MethodsA structured search of PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE for relevant publications from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2015 was performed, in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.ResultsThe number of published papers on sepsis and the microcirculation has increased steadily over the last 25 years. We identified 11 experimental animal studies comparing the effects of different fluid resuscitation regimens on the microcirculation. Heterogeneity precluded any meta-analysis.ConclusionsFew animal model studies have been published comparing the microcirculatory effects of different types of fluid resuscitation for sepsis and septic shock. Biologically relevant animal model studies remain necessary to enhance understanding regarding the mechanisms by which fluid resuscitation affects the microcirculation and to facilitate the transfer of basic science discoveries to clinical applications.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.