BACKGROUND: Novel therapies are needed to improve outcomes in T-cell lymphomas. The authors report the interim results of a prospective multicenter trial evaluating lenalidomide in T-cell lymphomas. METHODS: Patients with recurrent and refractory T-cell lymphomas other than mycosis fungoides and untreated patients ineligible for combination chemotherapy were prescribed oral lenalidomide (25 mg daily) on Days 1 to 21 of each 28-day cycle until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall response rate. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. The 2-stage design allows for up to 40 patients. RESULTS: At the time of this interim analysis, 24 patients were enrolled in this study, and 23 were evaluable for response. The median age was 65 years. The overall response rate was 7 (30%) of 23; all were partial responses. Two patients had stable disease for !5 cycles. Responses were seen in anaplastic, angioimmunoblastic, and peripheral Tcell unspecified histologies. Median PFS was 96 days (range, 8-696þ days). Median OS was 241 days (range, 8-696þ days). The most common grade 4 adverse event was thrombocytopenia (33%). The most common grade 3 adverse events were neutropenia (21%), febrile neutropenia (17%), and pain not otherwise specified (17%). Rash correlated with response to therapy (P ¼.003). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with recurrent and refractory T-cell lymphomas, oral lenalidomide monotherapy has clinical activity, and toxicity is consistent with the known safety profile of lenalidomide. Further study of lenalidomide in these diseases is warranted. Cancer 2010;116:4541-8.

BACKGROUND:Patients with T-cell lymphomas face a poorer prognosis compared with patients with B-cell lymphomas. New therapeutic approaches need to be developed to improve outcomes for these patients. METHODS: Forty patients with recurrent and refractory T-cell lymphomas other than mycosis fungoides and patients with untreated T-cell lymphoma who were not candidates for combination chemotherapy were prescribed oral lenalidomide at a dose of 25 mg daily on days 1 to 21 of each 28-day cycle, with standardized dose reductions for toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints were complete and partial response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. The authors also determined duration of response (DoR). RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were enrolled in the current study; 1 patient was subsequently deemed ineligible. The ORR was 10 of 39 patients (26%); 3 patients (8%) achieved complete responses and 7 patients achieved partial responses. Three patients had stable disease for 5 cycles. The median OS was 12 months (range <1 month to 69 months), the median PFS was 4 months (range, <1 month to 50 months), and the median DoR was 13 months (range 2 months to 37 months), including 5 responses that lasted >1 year. Toxicity was in keeping with the known safety profile of lenalidomide. Among the patients who had recurrent/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (29 patients), the ORR was 24%, the median OS was 12 months, the median PFS was 4 months, and the median DoR was 5 months (range, 2 months to 37 months). CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, the use of oral lenalidomide monotherapy demonstrated clinically relevant efficacy among patients with systemic T-cell lymphomas. It appears to have excellent potential as an agent in combination therapy for patients with T-cell lymphoma. Cancer 2015;121:716-23.

8524 Background: Novel therapies are needed to improve outcomes in T-cell lymphomas. We report the interim results of a prospective multicenter trial evaluating lenalidomide in T-cell lymphomas. Methods: Patients with relapsed and refractory T-cell lymphomas other than mycosis fungoides were prescribed oral lenalidomide (25mg daily) on days 1 to 21 of each 28 day cycle, with standardized dose reductions for toxicity. Treatment continued until disease progression, death or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall response rate, and secondary endpoints were complete and partial response rates, progression-free and overall survival (PFS, OS), and safety. The two-stage design allows for up to 40 patients. Results: At the time of this interim analysis, 24 patients were enrolled in this study and 23 were evaluable for response. The median age was 65 years. ECOG PS was 0–1 (n=15), 2 (n=7), 3 (n=2). The histology was peripheral T-cell unspecified (PTCL-u, n=10), angioimmunoblastic (n=7), anaplastic large cell (n=5), enteropathic T-cell (n=1) and hepatosplenic gamma/delta (n=1). Median number of prior therapies was 1 (range, 0–4), and three had prior autologous stem cell transplant. Four patients were previously untreated and not candidates for combination chemotherapy. Median time from completion of prior therapy to the start of lenalidomide was 8 months (range, 1–48 months). The overall response rate was 7/23 (30%); all were partial responses. Two patients had stable disease (SD) for ≥3 cycles. Responses were seen in anaplastic, angioimmunoblastic, and PTCL-u histologies. Median PFS was 96 days (range, 8–696 days). Median OS was 241 days (range, 8–696+ days). Among the 9 patients with SD or better, median PFS was 168 days and median OS has not yet been reached with 241–696 days of follow-up. The most common grade 4 adverse event was thrombocytopenia (33.3%). The most common grade 3 adverse events were neutropenia (20.8%), febrile neutropenia (16.7%), and pain NOS (16.7%). Conclusions: In relapsed and refractory T-cell lymphomas, oral lenalidomide monotherapy has clinical activity and toxicity is consistent with the known profile of lenalidomide. Further study of lenalidomide in these diseases is warranted. [Table: see text]