Purpose of review To highlight artificial intelligence applications in ophthalmology during the COVID-19 pandemic that can be used to: describe ocular findings and changes correlated with COVID-19; extract information from scholarly articles on SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 specific to ophthalmology; and implement efficient patient triage and telemedicine care. Recent findings Ophthalmology has been leading in artificial intelligence and technology applications. With medical imaging analysis, pixel-annotated distinguishable features on COVID-19 patients may help with noninvasive diagnosis and severity outcome predictions. Using natural language processing (NLP) and data integration methods, topic modeling on more than 200 ophthalmology-related articles on COVID-19 can summarize ocular manifestations, viral transmission, treatment strategies, and patient care and practice management. Artificial intelligence for telemedicine applications can address the high demand, prioritize and triage patients, as well as improve at home-monitoring devices and secure data transfers. Summary COVID-19 is significantly impacting the way we are delivering healthcare. Given the already successful implementation of artificial intelligence applications and telemedicine in ophthalmology, we expect that these systems will be embraced more as tools for research, education, and patient care.

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought an unprecedented change in the way we deliver eye care to our patients, most notably with the rapid addition of telehealth technology into our practices. We have welcomed telehealth with open arms in hopes that it would improve access to care for our patients; however, one question remains: Does it improve health equity?

Objectives: To describe indications for scleral contact lens (ScCL) evaluation, previous treatments, and outcomes of patients prescribed ScCL at a tertiary referral center. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed 133 patients evaluated for ScCL between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2015, at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) Contact Lens Service. Patient demographics, ocular history, indications for evaluation, previous treatments, presence of punctate epithelial erosions, number of lenses ordered, follow-up visits, best-corrected visual acuity before ScCL, and visual acuity with ScCL were evaluated. Patients were categorized based on primary indication for ScCL evaluation as ocular surface disease (OSD) or corneal irregularity (CI). The primary outcome was visual acuity. Results: Visual acuity improved from logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution 0.3±0.4 at presentation to 0.1±0.2 with ScCL in all eyes (n=223, P=0.0001), and from 0.3±0.5 to 0.1±0.2 (n=164, P=0.001) in the OSD group and 0.5±0.4 to 0.2±0.2 (n=59, P=0.0001) in the CI group. Seventy percent of patients were evaluated for bilateral ScCL evaluation. Indication for ScCL evaluation was OSD in 71% (n=95) of patients, with 20% having a secondary diagnosis of CI. Corneal irregularity was the primary diagnosis in 29% of patients (n=38), with 50% having a secondary diagnosis of OSD. Conclusions: Ocular surface disease was common in this tertiary referral patient population and was a primary or secondary indication for ScCL evaluation in 85.7% (n=114) of patients evaluated for ScCL. Scleral contact lenses improved visual outcomes in patients with both primary diagnoses of CI and OSD.

Objectives: To describe visual outcomes with various contact lens modalities in patients with a history of ocular trauma who underwent surgical open globe repair. Methods: Records of all patients with a history of open globe injury and repair at a tertiary care hospital between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2016, were reviewed. Demographics, type of injury, and visual acuity were assessed before and after contact lens evaluation. Results: Of 214 patients who underwent open globe repair, 29 (13.6%) were evaluated with a contact lens. Visual acuity improved in 97% (28 of 29) of patients from 1.4760.75 to 0.6760.71 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) with manifest refraction to 0.2860.45 log-MAR with contact lenses (n¼29; P,0.0001). Corneal opacity was the most common clinical indication (20 of 29) for fitting followed by aphakia (13 of 29). A range of contact lens modalities, including corneal rigid gaspermeable (12 of 28), soft (9 of 28), hybrid (3 of 28), scleral gaspermeable (2 of 28), and piggyback (2 of 28) lenses were prescribed. Conclusion: In this study, patients with a history of trauma and open globe repair with good neurosensory visual potential had improvements in visual acuity with contact lens greater than manifest refraction. Soft and gaspermeable lenses were used to improve visual acuity in patients with a history of open globe repair and corneal scarring, aphakia, iris abnormalities, or other ocular sequelae. Although corneal rigid gas-permeable lenses were prescribed most often, additional consideration should be given to other contact lens modalities, including soft, piggyback, hybrid, and scleral gas-permeable lenses.