BackgroundThe aim of this case series is to describe the experience of using the non-pneumatic anti-shock garment (NASG) in the management of severe Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) and shock, and the value of implementing this concept in high-complexity obstetric hospitals.MethodsDescriptive case series of 77 women that received NASG in the management of PPH with severe hypovolemic shock from June 2014 to December 2015. Vital signs, shock index (SI), the lactic acid value and the base deficit were compared before and after NASG application.ResultsFifty-six (77%) women had an SI > 1.1 at the time shock management was initiated; 96% had uterine atony. All women received standard does of uterotonics. The average time between the birth and NASG applications was 20 min. Forty-eight percent of women recovered haemodynamic variables in the first hour and 100% within the first 6 h; 100% had a SI < 1.0 in the first hour. The NASG was not removed until definitive control of bleeding was achieved, with an average time of use of 24 h. There were no mortalities.ConclusionsIn this case series of women in severe shock, the NASG was an effective management device for the control of severe hypovolemic shock. It should be considered a first-line option for shock management.

No abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of intervention packages for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) management in pregnant women hospitalized in a High Obstetric Complexity Unit in a Latin American country.MethodsRetrospective cohort study including pregnant women with PPH attended between January 2011 to December 2019. Three periods of time were defined according to management strategies We performed univariate and multivariate robust Poisson regression logistic models for each of the outcomes derived from each period.ResultsWe included 602 patients. There was a reduction in period 3 of the incidence of massive PPH (16% versus 12% P < 0.001, relative risk [RR] 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44–0.85; P = 0.003), major surgery (24%, 13%, 11%, P = 0.002, RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33–0.883; P = 0.014), and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) (14%, 7%, 6.1%, P = 0.0, RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.17–0.96 P = 0.00).ConclusionThe implementation of PPH intervention packages in a hospital in a middle‐income country from Latin America, led to a significant decrease in the incidence of massive bleeding, the rate of major surgery, and the ICU stay of pregnant women affected by this condition.