BackgroundDetermining the type and source of cells involved in regenerative processes has been one of the most important goals of researchers in the field of regeneration biology. We have previously used several cellular markers to characterize the cells involved in the regeneration of the intestine in the sea cucumber Holothuria glaberrima.ResultsWe have now obtained a monoclonal antibody that labels the mesothelium; the outer layer of the gut wall composed of peritoneocytes and myocytes. Using this antibody we studied the role of this tissue layer in the early stages of intestinal regeneration. We have now shown that the mesothelial cells of the mesentery, specifically the muscle component, undergo dedifferentiation from very early on in the regeneration process. Cell proliferation, on the other hand, increases much later, and mainly takes place in the mesothelium or coelomic epithelium of the regenerating intestinal rudiment. Moreover, we have found that the formation of the intestinal rudiment involves a novel regenerative mechanism where epithelial cells ingress into the connective tissue and acquire mesenchymal phenotypes.ConclusionsOur results strongly suggest that the dedifferentiating mesothelium provides the initial source of cells for the formation of the intestinal rudiment. At later stages, cell proliferation supplies additional cells necessary for the increase in size of the regenerate. Our data also shows that the mechanism of epithelial to mesenchymal transition provides many of the connective tissue cells found in the regenerating intestine. These results present some new and important information as to the cellular basis of organ regeneration and in particular to the process of regeneration of visceral organs.

The diagnosis of epilepsy is primarily based on the history and the verbal description of the events in question. Smartphone videos are increasingly used to assist in the diagnosis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate their value for the diagnosis of seizures. We prospectively collected smartphone videos from patients who presented to our epilepsy center over two years. The video‐based diagnosis was then compared to the eventual diagnosis based on video‐electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring with recorded episodes. Video‐EEG studies and smartphone videos were reviewed by two separate physicians, each blinded to the other's interpretation. Fifty‐four patients were included in the final analysis (mean age = 34.7 years, SD = 17 years). Data (either smartphone video or video‐EEG monitoring) were inconclusive in 18 patients. Of the 36 patients with conclusive data, 34 (94%) were in agreement. Smartphone video interpretation can be a useful adjunctive tool in the diagnosis of seizure‐like events.

Introduction The availability of ambulatory EEG-video monitoring gives an alternative to traditional inpatient EEG-video, but its yield and diagnostic value are not well known. This study evaluates the yield of ambulatory EEG-video for the diagnosis of epilepsy. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the ambulatory EEG-video monitoring data from 200 consecutive and unselected patients aged 12 years and older performed by a single company (RSC Diagnostic Services) between January 2018 and May 2018. Studies were processed by two senior certified long-term monitoring EEG technologists and interpreted by neurologists. Results Of the 200 patients, 130 (65%) were women, mean age was 45 years. Mean duration of studies were 76.6 hours (range 23-175 hours). There were 110 studies (55%) with events recorded and 101 (92%) were captured on video. Epileptic events accounted for 17.8% (18/101) of the events captured and 9% (18/200) of our total cohort. Nonepileptic diagnosis accounted for 38% of the total number of patients in study (76/200). Conclusion Ambulatory EEG-video monitoring may be a useful alternative to inpatient epilepsy monitoring unit, particularly with high clinical suspicion for nonepileptic events.

No abstract