Sensory hair cells of the mammalian organ of Corti in the inner ear do not regenerate when lost as a consequence of injury, disease, or age-related deafness. This contrasts with other vertebrates such as birds, where the death of hair cells causes surrounding supporting cells to re-enter the cell cycle and give rise to both new hair cells and supporting cells. It is not clear whether the lack of mammalian hair cell regeneration is due to an intrinsic inability of supporting cells to divide and differentiate or to an absence or blockade of regenerative signals. Here we show that post-mitotic supporting cells purified from the postnatal mouse cochlea retain the ability to divide and trans-differentiate into new hair cells in culture. Furthermore, we show that age-dependent changes in supporting cell proliferative capacity are due in part to changes in the ability to downregulate the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27(Kip1) (also known as Cdkn1b). These results indicate that postnatal mammalian supporting cells are potential targets for therapeutic manipulation.

No abstract

Summary The organ of Corti, the auditory organ of the inner ear, contains two types of sensory hair cells and at least seven types of supporting cells. Most of these supporting cell types rely on Notch-dependent expression of Hes/Hey transcription factors to maintain the supporting cell fate. Here we show that Notch signaling is not necessary for the differentiation and maintenance of pillar cell fate, that pillar cells are distinguished by Hey2 expression, and that – unlike other Hes/Hey factors – Hey2 expression is Notch-independent. Hey2 is activated by FGF and blocks hair cell differentiation, while mutation of Hey2 leaves pillar cells sensitive to the loss of Notch signaling and allows them to differentiate as hair cells. We speculate that co-option of FGF signaling to render Hey2 Notch-independent, also liberated pillar cells from the need for direct contact with surrounding hair cells, and enabled evolutionary remodeling of the complex cellular mosaic of the inner ear.

The chromatin of eukaryotic cells is organized in nucleosomes. This organization allows the efficient packaging of chromosomal DNA into the nucleus but limits the access of highmolecular-weight protein complexes of the transcription machinery. At least two different mechanisms enable the eukaryotic cell to relieve nucleosomal repression: the chromatinremodeling complexes (reviewed in references 55 and 57) and reversible histone acetylation. Two recent reports indicate a direct link between these two activities (60, 67). Posttranslational acetylation on conserved lysine residues within the Nterminal regions of nucleosomal histones is assumed to lead to a reduced attraction between chromosomal DNA and histone tails and changed interactions with neighboring nucleosomes or other nonhistone proteins. The resulting local chromatin decondensation increases the accessibility of particular DNA regions for RNA polymerase complexes. Consistent with this idea, transcriptionally active chromatin correlates with histone hyperacetylation (reviewed in references 18, 30, 47, 49, 61, and 62). This model predicts that histone acetyltransferases would promote transcription, while histone deacetylases (HDACs) should act as repressors. In accordance with this model, several transcriptional adapters and coactivators, such as GCN5 (8, 31), p300/CBP (4, 46), TAFII250 (40), SRC-1 (54), and ACTR (10), have been classified as histone acetyltransferases. Five HDACs have been identified in mammalian cells (12,14,56,58,63,64). Three of them, HDAC1, HDAC2, and HDAC3, have significant homology to yeast Rpd3 (44,50,59). HDAC4 and HDAC5 belong to the histone deacetylase A (HDA) family (9, 58). HDAC1 and HDAC2 are found in high-molecularweight complexes associated with adapter proteins like SIN3, SAP18, and SAP30 and nuclear corepressors like N-CoR, SMRT, and 24,32,42,65,66). Recently it was demonstrated that several mammalian transcription factors, such as Mad (21, 24, 32, 52), YY1 (64), hormone-dependent nuclear receptors (24, 42), MeCP2 (26, 43), CBF (27), retinoblastoma protein (Rb) (7, 38, 39), and related pocket proteins (16), can repress transcription by recruiting HDACs to specific promoters. In addition, the aberrant recruitment of HDACs by PLZF, PML, and ETO fusion proteins can interfere with the differentiation of hematopoietic precursor cells in acute promyelocytic leukemia (13,17,19,35).In this study we investigated the potential function of HDACs as transcriptional repressors during the growth arrest of mammalian cells. Using the S-phase-specific mouse thymidine kinase (TK) promoter as a model system, we show that HDAC1 can mediate transcriptional repression via the Sp1 binding site. HDAC1 is associated with Sp1 and binds directly to the C-terminal part of Sp1 that was previously identified as interacting domain for E2F1 (28). Sp1 and E2F1 cooperate in the activation of S-phase-specific promoters (28, 36). Here we show that E2F1 but not E2F4 can compete with HDAC1 binding to Sp1, thereby relieving HDAC1-mediated repression of the TK...