BACKGROUND:In North America and Europe, return-to-work (RTW) rates vary among breast cancer (BC) survivors, from 24% to 66% and from 53% to 82% at 6 and 36 months after diagnosis, respectively. To date, there is a lack of data on RTW rates after BC diagnosis in Latin America. Therefore, the primary objectives of this study were to define RTW rates at 12 and 24 months after BC diagnosis and to identify the factors associated with RTW in this population. METHODS: In total, 125 employed women from a single institution with newly diagnosed BC were interviewed by telephone at 6, 12, and 24 months after diagnosis. Those who had inoperable or metastatic disease were excluded. RESULTS: Overall, RTW rates were 30.3% and 60.4% at 12 and 24 months after BC diagnosis, respectively. Most women reported that they received support from their employer, but only 29.1% reported having been offered work adjustments. In multivariate analysis, the factors associated with positive RTW outcomes included higher household income (odds ratio [OR], 17.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.33-94.75; P = .001), breast-conserving surgery (OR, 9.77; 95% CI, 2.03-47.05; P = .004), and work adjustments (OR, 37.62; 95% CI, 2.03-47.05; P = .004). The factors associated with negative RTW outcomes included adjuvant endocrine therapy (OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.02-0.74; P = .023), and depression diagnosed after BC (OR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.63; P = .017). CONCLUSIONS: RTW rates in the current study were lower than those observed in developed countries but similar to the rates among low-income Americans. Workplace adjustments, higher income, breast-conserving surgery, endocrine therapy, and depression after BC played an important role in the RTW decision. Cancer 2018;124:4700-4710.
5540 Background: Primary debulking surgery (PDS) has been considered the standard of treatment in advanced ovarian cancer, while neoadjuvant chemotherapy, three cycles followed by interval debulking (ID) surgery, is a valid treatment alternative for patients with non-resectable disease. This study aimed to show the efficacy and safety of six cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (N-CT) followed by cytoreduction, a single institution experience. Methods: Aretrospective analysis was performed of all patients (pts) with advanced ovarian cancer treated with platinum based N-CT, between January/2004 and February/2012. Results: 97 pts underwent N-CT in our institution; 78.1% and 18.8% the patients had extensive stage IIIC or IV disease at diagnosis, respectively. Median age 60 years (36 – 82). Histologic types: serous 84.5%, adenocarcinoma not specified 11.3%, endometrioide 1.0%. A median of six cycles of chemotherapy were performed. Patients did not received chemotherapy after debulking surgery. During the treatment 31.4% had grade 3/4 toxicity, the most commonly observed toxicities were hematologic toxicities and nausea, four (4.1%) patients died during chemotherapy due to disease progression. After N-CT 24.7% achieved clinical complete response, 57.7% partial response and 12.4% disease progression. From this cohort 63.1% underwent a complete resection of all macroscopic and microscopic disease (R0). Median length of hospital stay and postoperative ICU stay was 5 and 0.8 days respectively, surgical complications were not common however five (7.1%) patients needed second surgery due to operatory complications and 19 pts (27.1%) needed blood transfusion after debulking. With a median follow up of 21.8 months (0.5-139.7), median overall survival and chemotherapy-free interval were 57,7 and 9,5 months, respectively. Conclusions: Six cycles of neoadjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel is safe, effective and does not increase perioperative and postoperative complications for patients with stage IIIC-IV not candidates for optimal/R0 PDS. The overall survival of this cohort is higher than those treated with interval debulking surgery.
476 Background: Temsirolimus is perceived as the standard of care in pts with mRCC with poor risk features. However, sunitinib (Su) is commonly used in this setting. In this study, we assessed the use of Su in an unselected mRCC population. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 51 pts with mRCC and ≥ 3 poor prognosis features, as determined in the Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (ARCC) trial, treated with Su between January 2006 and July 2012. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Clinical and laboratory parameters were evaluated, as well as Su-related adverse events (AE). Median time to treatment failure (mTTF) and OS were estimated by Kaplan–Meier methods. On exploratory grounds, univariate, and multivariate analysis using Cox regression model was performed to determine possible prognostic variables. Results: Median age was 60 years (26-89). Most had clear cell histology (98%), 19% prior systemic treatment, and 51% prior nephrectomy. 64%, 15%, and 4% had 4, 5, and 6 adverse prognosis factors respectively. 88% had diagnosis to treatment intervals < 1 year and 45% had KPS scores of < 80. A median of 2 cycles (0–12) were administered. 63% received standard regimen of Su (50 mg/d 4 wk on/2 wk off). Reasons for discontinuation were disease progression (63%) and adverse events (21%). Most grade ≥ 3 AE were fatigue (14%), neutropenia (8%), and stomatitis (8%). 17%, 25%, and 14% developed hypothyroidism, hand-foot syndrome (HFS), and hypertension, respectively. Two therapy-related deaths were observed (one febrile neutropenia and one intracranial hemorrhage). Estimated mTTF and mOS of this cohort were 2.4 and 6.6 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that in a model adjusted for type of Su regimen, KPS, presence of brain metastasis, and occurrence of HFS, only Su-associated hypothyroidism was significantly associated with survival (respectively, odds ratio [OR] = 0.23; 95% CI = 0.07-0.68). Conclusions: Pts with mRCC with poor risk features treated with Su have an OS, TTF and rates of therapy discontinuation due to AE comparable to clinical trial subsets of similar pts. Our data suggest that the development of hypothyroidism in this setting might be useful as a predictor of OS, and this finding should be further investigated.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.