BackgroundThe dysfunction of type I interferon (IFN) signaling is an important mechanism of immune escape and metastasis in tumors. Increased NOS1 expression has been detected in melanoma, which correlated with dysfunctional IFN signaling and poor response to immunotherapy, but the specific mechanism has not been determined. In this study, we investigated the regulation of NOS1 on the interferon response and clarified the relevant molecular mechanisms.MethodsAfter stable transfection of A375 cells with NOS1 expression plasmids, the transcription and expression of IFNα-stimulated genes (ISGs) were assessed using pISRE luciferase reporter gene analysis, RT-PCR, and western blotting, respectively. The effect of NOS1 on lung metastasis was assessed in melanoma mouse models. A biotin-switch assay was performed to detect the S-nitrosylation of HDAC2 by NOS1. ChIP-qPCR was conducted to measure the binding of HDAC2, H4K16ac, H4K5ac, H3ac, and RNA polymerase II in the promoters of ISGs after IFNα stimulation. This effect was further evaluated by altering the expression level of HDAC2 or by transfecting the HDAC2-C262A/C274A site mutant plasmids into cells. The coimmunoprecipitation assay was performed to detect the interaction of HDAC2 with STAT1 and STAT2. Loss-of-function and gain-of-function approaches were used to examine the effect of HDAC2-C262A/C274A on lung metastasis. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry.ResultsHDAC2 is recruited to the promoter of ISGs and deacetylates H4K16 for the optimal expression of ISGs in response to IFNα treatment. Overexpression of NOS1 in melanoma cells decreases IFNα-responsiveness and induces the S-nitrosylation of HDAC2-C262/C274. This modification decreases the binding of HDAC2 with STAT1, thereby reducing the recruitment of HDAC2 to the ISG promoter and the deacetylation of H4K16. Moreover, expression of a mutant form of HDAC2, which cannot be nitrosylated, reverses the inhibition of ISG expression by NOS1 in vitro and decreases NOS1-induced lung metastasis and inhibition of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in a melanoma mouse model.ConclusionsThis study provides evidence that NOS1 induces dysfunctional IFN signaling to promote lung metastasis in melanoma, highlighting NOS1-induced S-nitrosylation of HDAC2 in the regulation of IFN signaling via histone modification.

In recent years, the emergence of single‐cell omics technologies, which can profile genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, and proteomics, has provided unprecedented insights into characteristics of cancer, enabling higher resolution and accuracy to decipher the cellular and molecular mechanisms relating to tumorigenesis, evolution, metastasis, and immune responses. Single‐cell multi‐omics technologies, which are developed based on the combination of multiple single‐cell mono‐omics technologies, can simultaneously analyze RNA expression, single nucleotide polymorphism, epigenetic modification, or protein abundance, enabling the in‐depth understanding of gene expression regulatory mechanisms. In this review, the state‐of‐the‐art single‐cell multi‐omics technologies are summarized and the prospects of their application in cancer biology are discussed.

Immunotherapies have been accelerating the development of anti-cancer clinical treatment, but its low objective responses and severe off-target immune-related adverse events (irAEs) limit the range of application. Strategies to remove these obstacles primarily focus on the combination of different therapies and the exploitation of new immunotherapeutic agents. Nanomedicine potentiates the effects of activating immune cells selectively and reversing tumor induced immune deficiency microenvironment through multiple mechanisms. In the last decade, a variety of nano-enabled tumor immunotherapies was under clinical investigation. As time goes by, the advantages of nanomedicine are increasingly prominent. With the continuous development of nanotechnology, nanomedicine will offer more distinctive perspectives in imaging diagnosis and treatment of tumors. In this Review, we wish to provide an overview of tumor immunotherapy and the mechanisms of nanomaterials that aim to enhance the efficacy of tumor immunotherapy under development or in clinic treatment.

Three-dimensional (3D) genomics is the frontier field in the post-genomics era, its foremost content is the relationship between chromatin spatial conformation and regulation of gene transcription. Cancer biology is a complex system resulting from genetic alterations in key tumor oncogenes and suppressor genes for cell proliferation, DNA replication, cell differentiation, and homeostatic functions. Although scientific research in recent decades has revealed how the genome sequence is mutated in many cancers, high-order chromosomal structures involved in the development and fate of cancer cells represent a crucial but rarely explored aspect of cancer genomics. Hence, dissection of the 3D genome conformation of cancer helps understand the unique epigenetic patterns and gene regulation processes that distinguish cancer biology from normal physiological states. In recent years, research in tumor 3D genomics has grown quickly. With the rapid progress of 3D genomics technology, we can now better determine the relationship between cancer pathogenesis and the chromatin structure of cancer cells. It is becoming increasingly explicit that changes in 3D chromatin structure play a vital role in controlling oncogene transcription. This review focuses on the relationships between tumor gene expression regulation, tumor 3D chromatin structure, and cancer phenotypic plasticity. Furthermore, based on the functional consequences of spatial disorganization in the cancer genome, we look forward to the clinical application prospects of 3D genomic biomarkers.