Background: The management of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder requires the assessment of bone turnover, which most often is based on parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentration, the utility of which remains controversial.Study Design: Cross-sectional retrospective diagnostic test study. Setting & Participants: 492 dialysis patients from Brazil, Portugal, Turkey, and Venezuela with prior bone biopsy and stored (220 C) serum.Index Tests: Samples were analyzed for PTH (intact [iPTH] and whole PTH), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (bALP), and amino-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen (P1NP).Reference Test: Bone histomorphometric assessment of turnover (bone formation rate/bone surface [BFR/ BS]) and receiver operating characteristic curves for discriminating diagnostic ability.Results: The biomarkers iPTH and bALP or combinations thereof allowed discrimination of low from nonlow and high from nonhigh BFR/BS, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve . 0.70 but , 0.80. Using iPTH level, the best cutoff to discriminate low from nonlow BFR/BS was ,103.8 pg/mL, and to discriminate high from nonhigh BFR/BS was .323.0 pg/mL. The best cutoff for bALP to discriminate low from nonlow BFR/BS was ,33.1 U/L, and for high from nonhigh BFR/BS, 42.1 U/L. Using the KDIGO practice guideline PTH values of greater than 2 but less than 9 times the upper limit of normal, sensitivity and specificity of iPTH level to discriminate low from nonlow turnover bone disease were 65.7% and 65.3%, and to discriminate high from nonhigh were 37.0% and 85.8%, respectively.Limitations: Cross-sectional design without consideration of therapy. Potential limited generalizability with samples from 4 countries.Conclusions: The serum biomarkers iPTH, whole PTH, and bALP were able to discriminate low from nonlow BFR/BS, whereas iPTH and bALP were able to discriminate high from nonhigh BFR/BS. Prospective studies are required to determine whether evaluating trends in biomarker concentrations could guide therapeutic decisions. Am J Kidney Dis. 67(4):559-566. ª 2016 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.

No abstract

Disturbances in mineral metabolism play a central role in the development of renal bone disease. In a 54-wk, randomized, open-label study, 119 hemodialysis patients were enrolled to compare the effects of sevelamer hydrochloride and calcium carbonate on bone. Biopsy-proven adynamic bone disease was the most frequent bone abnormality at baseline (59%). Serum phosphorus, calcium, and intact parathyroid hormone were well controlled in both groups, although calcium was consistently lower and intact parathyroid hormone higher among patients who were randomly assigned to sevelamer. Compared with baseline values, there were no changes in mineralization lag time or measures of bone turnover (e.g., activation frequency) after 1 yr in either group. Osteoid thickness significantly increased in both groups, but there was no significant difference between them. Bone formation rate per bone surface, however, significantly increased from baseline only in the sevelamer group (P ϭ 0.019). In addition, of those with abnormal microarchitecture at baseline (i.e., trabecular separation), seven of 10 in the sevelamer group normalized after 1 yr compared with zero of three in the calcium group. In summary, sevelamer resulted in no statistically significant changes in bone turnover or mineralization compared with calcium carbonate, but bone formation increased and trabecular architecture improved with sevelamer. Further studies are required to assess whether these changes affect clinical outcomes, such as rates of fracture. 19: 405-412, 200819: 405-412, . doi: 10.1681 Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) typically have abnormal bone histology. Alterations in bone turnover, mineralization, and volume in renal patients depend on several factors. In particular, disturbances in calcium-phosphate, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and vitamin D metabolism are important in the development of renal osteodystrophy (ROD). J Am Soc NephrolThe pattern of ROD observed in patients with stage 5 CKD has changed in recent years. Previously, observed bone conditions in renal patients in order of prevalence were mixed uremic osteodystrophy (MUO), predominant hyperparathyroid bone disease (HPBD), and aluminum-related os-