A protocol is developed which allows the translation of the Health Belief Model (HBM) to practice in supplying empirical needs assessment data on which to build responsive and effective VD education. The HBM is recognized as among the most important theoretical formulations to explain health behavior available in the health education literature, although there has to date been no information as to how to bridge the gap between theory and practice for actual, specific, and detailed programmatic input. The present study describes a procedure for using the HBM as a tool enabling practitioners to isolate those beliefs that need to be addressed for a given population. Prior attempts at belief identification have been limited to the four major dimensions of the HBM (perceptions of susceptibility, seriousness, barriers, and benefits), often with a single item to address each gross dimension. Such efforts are incapable of determining discrete areas of beliefs subject to change through direct educational intervention. The conceptualization and development of an extended view of these dimensions to include numerous individual entities enables the practitioner to create a data base which overcomes this limitation. The development of the VD Health Belief Scale is detailed. Subscales were operationalized by developing standardized attitude scales comprised of Likert-type items requiring a response on a five-point scale of agreement; instrument refinement occurred at several stages; and selected items were screened through internal consistency item analysis. Resultant scales had acceptable reliability with alphas of .89, .66, .91, .86, and .84. A straightforward procedure is described to explain how the measure is used to develop appropriate needs assessment data using the HBM framework. Studies performed by the authors utilizing the procedure are presented to illustrate the application of the research protocol.
A quasi experimental study (non-equivalent control group design) was undertaken with the objective to assess the effectiveness of Learning package on knowledge regarding the activities to be performed during the labour process among antenatal women attending the antenatal outdoor and admitted in antenatal indoor, and to nd out the association between the pre-test knowledge score with selected demographic variables. The conceptual framework adopted was based on ‘System Model’. Non-probability purposive sampling technique was used to select 60 antenatal women. A structured interview schedule was developed and validated for data collection. Collected data were computed using descriptive and inferential statistics. There is signi cant mean difference between the pre-test and post-test mean score in experimental group and between the post-test knowledge score of experimental and control group at 0.05 level of signi cance as evident by ‘t’ value (15.83) at df 26 and t value (7.04) at df 49 respectively. Hence the learning package helped in gaining signi cant knowledge among antenatal women in experimental group. There was association between the Pre-test knowledge score and No. of Gravida (2 =11.41, at df 2at p<0.05) in experimental group. The study was believed to be helpful in nursing services, education, administration and research.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY of some ofthe enzymes were indicative of the concentrations ofthe insecticides. Synergistic or antagonistic effects of combinations of pesticides were obtained by using simple techniques.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.