Background Microsurgery is one of the most challenging areas of surgery with a steep learning curve. To address this educational need, microsurgery curricula have been developed and validated, the majority focus on technical skill only. The aim of this study was to report on the evaluation of a well-established curriculum using the Kirkpatrick model. Methods A training curriculum was delivered over 5 days between 2017 to 2020 focusing on: 1) microscopic field manipulation, 2) knot tying, non-dominant hand usage, 3) 3D models/anastomosis, 4) tissue experience. The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model were applied:1) participants feedback 2) skills development using a validated, objective assessment tool (GAS form) and CUSUM charts were constructed to model proficiency gain 3) and 4) assessing skill retention/long-term impact. Results 155 participants undertook the curriculum, totalling 5,425 hours of training. More than 75% of students reported the course as excellent, with the remaining voting for 'good'. Unanimous agreement among the learners that the curriculum met expectations and would recommend it. Significant improvement in anastomosis attainment scores between days 1—3 (median score 4) and days 4—5 (median score 5) (W = 494.5, p = 0.00170). The frequency of errors reduced with successive attempts (Chi-sq = 9.81, p = 0.00174). The steepest learning curve was in anastomosis and patency domains, requiring eleven attempts on average to reach proficiency. 88.5% survey respondents could apply the skills learnt and 76.9% applied the skills learnt within 6 months. Key areas of improvement were identified from this evaluation and actions to address them were implemented in following programmes. Conclusions Robust evaluation of curriculum can be applied to microsurgery training demonstrating its efficacy in reducing surgical errors with an improvement in overall technical skills that can extend to impact clinical practice. It allows identification of areas of improvement, driving refinement of training programmes.

ObjectivesTo examine patients’ accounts of their use of the internet before seeing a general practitioner (GP) using thematic analysis of semistructured interviews.DesignQualitative semistructured interview study with transcripts analysed thematically.SettingPrimary care patients consulting with 10 GPs working at 7 GP practices of varying sizes and at a range of locations around London and the Southeast of England.Participants28 adult patients: 16 women and 12 men ranging in age from 18 to 75 from a range of self-defined ethnic backgrounds. Participants were selected based on instances when the patients reported having used the internet before the consultation, when patients referred to the internet in the consultation or when the physician used the internet or made reference to it during the consultation.ResultsPatients report that they can find health information online that they believe is reliable and helpful for both themselves and their GP. However, they report uncertainty about how to share internet-based findings and reluctance to disclose their efforts at researching health issues online for fear of appearing disrespectful or interfering with the flow of the consultation.ConclusionsDespite the democratisation of access to information about health due via the internet, patients continue to experience their use of the internet for health information as a sensitive and potentially problematic topic. The onus may well be on GPs to raise the likelihood (without judgement) that patients will have looked things up before consulting and invite them to talk about what they found.