Coagulation abnormalities, including an increased platelet turnover, are frequently found in patients with cancer. Because platelets secrete angiogenic factors on activation, this study tested the hypothesis that platelets contribute to angiogenesis. Stimulation with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF, 25 ng/mL) of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) promoted adhesion of nonactivated platelets 2.5-fold. In contrast, stimulation of HUVECs with basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) did not promote platelet adhesion. By blocking tissue factor (TF) activity, platelet adhesion was prevented and antibodies against fibrin(ogen) and the platelet-specific integrin, αIIbβ3, inhibited platelet adhesion for 70% to 90%. These results indicate that VEGF-induced platelet adhesion to endothelial cells is dependent on activation of TF. The involvement of fibrin(ogen) and the αIIbβ3 integrin, which exposes a high-affinity binding site for fibrin(ogen) on platelet activation, indicates that these adhering platelets are activated. This was supported by the finding that the activity of thrombin, a product of TF-activated coagulation and a potent platelet activator, was required for platelet adhesion. Finally, platelets at physiologic concentrations stimulated proliferation of HUVECs, indicative of proangiogenic activity in vivo. These results support the hypothesis that platelets contribute to tumor-induced angiogenesis. In addition, they may explain the clinical observation of an increased platelet turnover in cancer patients. Platelets may also play an important role in other angiogenesis-dependent diseases in which VEGF is involved, such as diabetes and autoimmune diseases.

No abstract

Primary Purpose. Formation of ascites and pleural effusion (PE) is a common problem for patients with advanced-stage cancer. These fluid accumulations cause severe symptoms such as abdominal distention, shortness of breath, cachexia, anorexia, and fatigue. Preclinical models have demonstrated that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a pivotal role in the accumulation of malignant PE or ascites. This study investigated whether blockade of VEGF activity would reduce biological activity of PE and ascites on endothelial cells of cancer patients.Patients and Methods. The activity of VEGF in PE and ascites of 58 patients (39 with PE and 19 with ascites) was measured. An endothelial cell proliferation assay with human umbilical vein endothelial cells was used to determine the biological activity of ascites and PE.Results. VEGF concentrations ranged from 67-6,245 pg/ml. A significantly higher concentration of VEGF was detected in the ascites and PE of patients with cancer (median, 1,290 pg/ml) than in patients with nonmalignant disease (median, 250 pg/ml; p = 0.02). Of the 58 PE and ascites samples, 41 were biologically active, based on a two-to fourfold stimulation of endothelial cell proliferation in 72 hours. VEGF concentrations were significantly higher in the biologically active samples compared with the 17 nonactive samples (2,056 pg/ml versus 771 pg/ml; p = 0.02). Coincubation of the samples with either a neutralizing polyclonal antibody against VEGF or SU5416, a small molecule inhibitor of the VEGF receptor Flk-1/KDR, inhibited endothelial cell proliferation by 66% and 100%, respectively. The inhibition caused by the antibody and that caused by SU5416 correlated significantly (r = 0.8, p < 0.001).Conclusion. We conclude that malignant ascites and PE contain high levels of biologically active VEGF. This study strongly supports the hypothesis that blockade of VEGF, such as that afforded by SU5416, may benefit cancer patients with recurrent ascites or PE formation.

Besides its cardiotoxic effect, doxorubicin also elicits inflammatory effects in vivo. 7-Monohydroxyethylrutoside (monoHER) has recently been used as a protector against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in vivo. It is not known yet whether monoHER can also protect against doxorubicin-induced inflammatory effects. The aim of the present study was (1) to illustrate the inflammatory effects of doxorubicin in vitro and (2) to evaluate a possibly protective effect of monoHER. In order to demonstrate the inflammatory effects of doxorubicin and the possible protection of monoHER, proliferating human umbilical cord vascular endothelial cells (HUVECs) were incubated with different concentrations of doxorubicin ranging from 12.5 to 600 nM with(out) 200 mM monoHER. Resting (confluent) HUVECs were incubated with (0.5 -25 mM) doxorubicin with(out) monoHER (0.2 -1.2 mM) and the viability of endothelial cells and their propensity to adhere to neutrophils were measured 24 h after treatment. The localisation of adhered neutrophils was determined with immunofluorescence microscopy. To further characterise the mechanism of doxorubicin-induced neutrophil adhesion, the expression of the HUVECs surface adhesion molecules was determined after doxorubicin treatment. Doxorubicin decreased the viability and proliferation capacity of HUVECs in a concentration-dependent manner. The proliferating HUVECs were much more sensitive to doxorubicin (IC 50 ¼ 60.0720.8 nM) than resting cells (LC 50 ¼ 4.070.3 mM). Doxorubicin also increased the adhesion of neutrophils reaching a plateau value at a doxorubicin concentration of X0.4mM (P ¼ 0.0113). The induced neutrophil adhesion was accompanied by overexpression of VCAM and E-selectin but not ICAM. Although monoHER did not reverse the effect of doxorubicin on the proliferation of endothelial cells, it significantly protected resting HUVECs against the cytotoxic effect of doxorubicin (p25 mM, Po0.0015). In addition, monoHER completely protected against the stimulatory effect of doxorubicin on neutrophil adhesion, and inhibited the doxorubin-induced expression of VCAM and E-selectin on the surface of treated HUVECs. This study illustrates that monoHER, which protects against doxorubicin's cardiotoxic effect, can also protect against doxorubicin-induced inflammatory effects. These data prompt further investigation about the possible link between doxorubicin-induced inflammatory effects and its cardiotoxicity in vivo.

Nitric oxide (NO) is an important molecule in regulating tumour blood flow and stimulating tumour angiogenesis. Inhibition of NO synthase by L-NAME might induce an anti-tumour effect by limiting nutrients and oxygen to reach tumour tissue or affecting vascular growth. The anti-tumour effect of L-NAME after systemic administration was studied in a renal subcapsular CC531 adenocarcinoma model in rats. Moreover, regional administration of L-NAME, in combination with TNF and melphalan, was studied in an isolated limb perfusion (ILP) model using BN175 soft-tissue sarcomas. Systemic treatment with L-NAME inhibited growth of adenocarcinoma significantly but was accompanied by impaired renal function. In ILP, reduced tumour growth was observed when L-NAME was used alone. In combination with TNF or melphalan, L-NAME increased response rates significantly compared to perfusions without L-NAME (0–64% and 0–63% respectively). An additional anti-tumour effect was demonstrated when L-NAME was added to the synergistic combination of melphalan and TNF (responses increased from 70 to 100%). Inhibition of NO synthase reduces tumour growth both after systemic and regional (ILP) treatment. A synergistic anti-tumour effect of L-NAME is observed in combination with melphalan and/or TNF using ILP. These results indicate a possible role of L-NAME for the treatment of solid tumours in a systemic or regional setting. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign