Background:Because of the environment in which they work, many health care workers are at an increased risk of accidental needle stick injuries (NSI).Objective:To study prevalence and response to needle stick injuries among health care workers.Materials and Methods:Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: A tertiary care hospital in Delhi. Participants: 322 resident doctors, interns, nursing staff, nursing students, and technicians. Statistical Analysis: Proportions and Chi-square test.Results:A large percentage (79.5%) of HCWs reported having had one or more NSIs in their career. The average number of NSIs ever was found to be 3.85 per HCW (range 0-20). 72 (22.4%) reported having received a NSI within the last month. More than half (50.4%) ascribed fatigue as a cause in their injury. Most of the injuries (34.0%) occurred during recapping. In response to their most recent NSI, 60.9% washed the site of injury with water and soap while 38 (14.8%) did nothing. Only 20 (7.8%) of the HCWs took post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) against HIV/AIDS after their injury.Conclusions:The occurrence of NSI was found to be quite common. Avoidable practices like recapping of needles were contributing to the injuries. Prevention of NSI is an integral part of prevention programs in the work place, and training of HCWs regarding safety practices indispensably needs to be an ongoing activity at a hospital.

Hepatocyte transplantation has been investigated in patients with liver-based metabolic disorders and acute liver failure. We report the first use of hepatocyte transplantation in two brothers with severe inherited coagulation factor VII deficiency. Patient 1 received a total of 1.09x10(9) cryopreserved hepatocytes, and patient received 2.18x10(9) fresh and cryopreserved hepatocytes through a Hickman line inserted in the inferior mesenteric vein. Infusion of isolated human hepatocytes improved the coagulation defect and markedly decreased the requirement for exogenous recombinant factor VII (rFVIIa) to approximately 20% of that before cell transplantation. In both patients, episodes of line sepsis were associated with an increase in rFVIIa requirement. Six months posthepatocyte transplantation, higher rFVIIa doses were required, suggesting loss of transplanted hepatocyte function. Because of increasing problems with venous access and long-term uncertainty of the efficacy of hepatocyte transplantation, orthotopic liver transplantation was performed successfully in both cases.

Summary:Voriconazole, a new antifungal agent, is increasingly being used after HSCT. The hepatic cytochrome P450 isoenzyme 2C19 plays a significant role in voriconazole metabolism. As CYP2C19 exhibits significant genetic polymorphism, some patients metabolize voriconazole poorly resulting in increased plasma drug levels. The clinical significance of this is unknown, and the utility of monitoring voriconazole levels is unclear. Steady-state trough plasma voriconazole levels were obtained in 25 allogeneic HSCT recipients using an HPLC assay. Patients had drug levels checked once (n ¼ 13), twice (n ¼ 10), or X3 times (n ¼ 2) 5-18 days (median 10) after starting voriconazole or dose modification. The 41 voriconazole levels were 0.2-6.8 lg/ml (median 1.6); 6 (15%) were o0.5 (possibly below the in vitro MIC 90 for Aspergillus spp.). Voriconazole concentrations correlated with aspartate aminotranferase (AST) (r ¼ 0.5; P ¼ 0.0009) and alkaline phosphatase (r ¼ 0.34; P ¼ 0.03), but not with creatinine, bilirubin and alanine aminotransferase (ALT). Since liver dysfunction is common after HSCT, it was not possible to determine if elevated AST and alkaline phosphatase levels were the cause or the consequence of higher voriconazole levels. We conclude that trough voriconazole levels vary considerably between patients, and suggest monitoring levels in patients receiving voriconazole for confirmed fungal infections, and in those with elevated AST or alkaline phosphatase levels. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2005) 35, 509-513.

Growing evidence suggests receipt of live‐attenuated viral vaccines after solid organ transplant (SOT) has occurred and is safe and needed due to lapses in herd immunity. A 2‐day consortium of experts in infectious diseases, transplantation, vaccinology, and immunology was held with the objective to review evidence and create expert recommendations for clinicians when considering live viral vaccines post‐SOT. For consideration of VV and MMR post‐transplant, evidence exists only for kidney and liver transplant recipients. For MMR vaccine post‐SOT, consider vaccination during outbreak or travel to endemic risk areas. Patients who have received antiproliferative agents (eg. mycophenolate mofetil), T cell–depleting agents, or rituximab; or have persistently elevated EBV viral loads, or are in a state of functional tolerance, should be vaccinated with caution and have a more in‐depth evaluation to define benefit of vaccination and net state of immune suppression prior to considering vaccination. MMR and/or VV (not combined MMRV) is considered to be safe in patients who are clinically well, are greater than 1 year after liver or kidney transplant and 2 months after acute rejection episode, can be closely monitored, and meet specific criteria of “low‐level” immune suppression as defined in the document.

PLA is a rare diagnosis in children in the developed world. It may be caused by primary neutrophil disorders even in the absence of a previous history of infection. Co-existent appendicitis, intra-abdominal sepsis, and ascending pylephlebitis must be sought because these children are at risk of developing portal vein obstruction and portal hypertension. Prolonged intravenous antibiotic treatment guided by microbiologic sensitivities is highly effective.