This paper originates from an address at the 8th International Symposium on Nitrogen Fixation with Non-Legumes, Sydney, NSW, December 2000
Azospirilla are free-living rhizobacteria that are able to promote plant
growth and increase yields in many crops of agronomic importance. It is
assumed that the bacteria affect plant growth mainly by the production of
plant growth promoting substances, which leads to an improvement in root
development and an increase in the rate of water and mineral uptake. In the
present review, we discuss the physiological responses of the plant roots to
inoculation with Azospirillum, and report on field and
greenhouse experiments carried out with these bacteria during 1994–2001
in Belgium, Uruguay, Mexico and Israel.
Plant root development can be largely affected through the association of roots with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). However, little is known about the identity of plant genes enabling such PGPR-plant root associations. Differences in the responsiveness to PGPR among cultivars suggest genetic variation for this trait within germplasm. In this study, two genotypes of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), BAT477 and DOR364, were identified showing contrasting responsiveness in root development to inoculation with the PGPR Azospirillum brasilense Sp245. Inoculation with an A. brasilense Sp245 mutant strain strongly reduced in auxin biosynthesis or addition of increasing concentrations of exogenous auxin to the plant growth medium, indicated that the differential response to A. brasilense Sp245 among the bean genotypes is related to a differential response to the bacterial produced auxin. To further assess the role of the plant host in root responsiveness, a population of Recombinant Inbred Lines (RILs) of the DOR364×BAT477 cross was used to evaluate the efficacy of exogenous auxin on root development. We detected significant phenotypic variation among the RILs for basal root formation during germination upon addition of auxin to the growth medium. Genetic analysis revealed two quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with basal root responsiveness to auxin of which one explained 36% of the phenotypic variation among the RILs. This latter QTL mapped to the same location as a QTL for root tip formation at low P, suggesting that the host effect on root responsiveness to IAA interacts with specific root development. Also, significant correlations between basal root responsiveness to auxin and growth, root tips and root dry weight at low P were identified. To our knowledge, this is the first report on QTL detection for root responsiveness to auxin.
The production of phytohormones by plantgrowth promoting rhizobacteria is considered to be an important mechanism by which these bacteria promote plant growth. In this study the importance of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) produced by Azospirillum brasilense Sp245 in the observed plant growth stimulation was investigated by using Sp245 strains genetically modified in IAA production. Firstly wildtype A. brasilense Sp245 and an ipdC knock-out mutant which produces only 10% of wild-type IAA levels (Vande Broek et al., J Bacteriol 181:1338-1342) were compared in a greenhouse inoculation experiment for a number of plant parameters, thereby clearly demonstrating the IAA effect in plant growth promotion. Secondly, the question was addressed whether altering expression of the ipdC gene, encoding the key enzyme for IAA biosynthesis in A. brasilense, could also contribute to plant growth promotion. For that purpose, the endogenous promoter of the ipdC gene was replaced by either a constitutive or a plant-inducible promoter and both constructs were introduced into the wild-type strain.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.