The Bunyaviridae is the largest family of RNA viruses, with over 350 members worldwide. Several of these viruses cause severe diseases in livestock and humans. With an increasing number and frequency of outbreaks, bunyaviruses represent a growing threat to public health and agricultural productivity globally. Yet, the receptors, cellular factors and endocytic pathways used by these emerging pathogens to infect cells remain largely uncharacterized. The focus of this review is on the early steps of bunyavirus infection, from virus binding to penetration from endosomes. We address current knowledge and advances for members from each genus in the Bunyaviridae family regarding virus receptors, uptake, intracellular trafficking and fusion.

Influenza virus neuraminidase (NA) is the primary target for influenza therapeutics. Severe complications are often related to secondary pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococci), which also express NAs. Recently, a NA-mediated lethal synergism between influenza A viruses and pneumococci was described. Therefore, dual inhibitors of both viral and bacterial NAs are expected to be advantageous for the treatment of influenza. We investigated the traditional Chinese herbal drug sāng bái pí (mulberry root bark) as source for anti-infectives. Two prenylated flavonoid derivatives, sanggenon G (4) and sanggenol A (5) inhibited influenza A viral and pneumococcal NAs and, in contrast to the approved NA inhibitor oseltamivir, also planktonic growth and biofilm formation of pneumococci. Evaluation of 27 congeners of 5 revealed a correlation between the degree of prenylation and bioactivity. Abyssinone-V 4′-methyl ether (27) inhibited pneumococcal NA with IC50 = 2.18 μM, pneumococcal growth with MIC = 5.63 μM, and biofilm formation with MBIC = 4.21 μM, without harming lung epithelial cells. Compounds 5 and 27 also disrupt the synergism between influenza A virus and pneumococcal NA in vitro, hence functioning as dual-acting anti-infectives. The results warrant further studies on whether the observed disruption of this synergism is transferable to in vivo systems.

Recently, the binding kinetics of a ligand-target interaction, such as the residence time of a small molecule on its protein target, are seen as increasingly important for drug efficacy. Here, we investigate these concepts to explain binding and proton blockage of rimantadine variants bearing progressively larger alkyl groups to influenza A virus M2 wild type (WT) and M2 S31N protein proton channel. We showed that resistance of M2 S31N to rimantadine analogues compared to M2 WT resulted from their higher rates compared to the rates according to electrophysiology (EP) measurements. This is due to the fact that, in M2 S31N, the loss of the V27 pocket for the adamantyl cage resulted in low residence time inside the M2 pore. Both rimantadine enantiomers have similar channel blockage and binding and against M2 WT. To compare the potency between the rimantadine variants against M2, we applied approaches using different mimicry of M2, i.e., isothermal titration calorimetry and molecular dynamics simulation, EP, and antiviral assays. It was also shown that a small change in an amino acid at site 28 of M2 WT, which does not line the pore, seriously affects M2 WT blockage kinetics.

Aims: In this study, we analyze the challenges involved in detecting novel neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) and offer strategies to overcome them with complementary bioassays. Materials & Methods: We investigated the inhibitory activities of NAIs (oseltamivir, zanamivir, DANA, katsumadain A and remazol) as well as non-NAIs (amantadine, nucleozin and rifampicin) on influenzaviral and bacterial (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Clostridium perfringens and Vibrio cholerae) neuraminidases (NAs) with chemiluminescence (CL)- and fluorescence (FL)-based assays. Furthermore, hemagglutination-based NA inhibition assays were established. Results: Our study shows three types of signal interference affecting the readout of biochemical assays: self-FL (katsumadain A and remazol), FL quenching (rifampicin) and CL quenching (rifampicin, remazol, nucleozin and katsumadain A). These challenges were overcome by hemagglutination-based assays. Conclusion: The latter allow a robust performance in discriminating NAIs and non-NAIs.