No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Introduction Open fractures are associated with increased infection rates and the evidence shows timely administration of prophylactic antibiotics within one hour of injury improves the outcomes. Method A multi-cycle audit was carried out retrospectively for patients presenting to Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust (BSUH) with an open limb fracture in 2018-2020. Targeted teaching was carried out for orthopaedic trainees, prompt posters created and alterations to the trauma clerking proforma were implemented. Results In first cycle, 48 (92.3%) out of total 52 patients were prescribed antibiotics prior to definitive surgical management, with a mean time to administration of 271 minutes. Of these, 41 (78.8%) received prescriptions according to BSUH guidelines. The use of STAT ‘once-only’ prescriptions was found to significantly reduce the mean time to administration for 154 minutes. In second cycle, all of 29 patients (100%) were prescribed antibiotics prior to definitive surgical management, with a reduced mean time to administration (233 minutes). Of these, 26 (89.7%) received prescriptions according to BSUH guidelines, and a significantly greater proportion received initial STAT prescriptions (51.7% vs. 15.4%). Conclusions This quality improvement project has demonstrated the successful implementation of targeted changes to improve the attainment of BOAST 4 guidelines.

Aims Robotic incisional/ventral hernia repair (R-IVHR) is gaining popularity due to higher safety as well as feasibility profile. The objective of this study is to present a systematic review exploring the role of robotics compared to laparoscopic approach in the management of incisional/ventral hernia. Methods A systematic review of all types of comparative studies until January 2021 published on Embase, Medline, PubMed, PubMed Central and Cochrane databases reporting the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing either R-IVHR versus Laparoscopic (L-IVHR) was performed. Results A total of 8289 patients in 7 studies were included. There was minimal heterogeneity (Tau2 = 0.29, chi2 = 9.10, df, I2 = 45 %) among included studies for the variables of recurrence rate and post-operative complications, but statistically significant heterogeneity (Tau2 = 1.05, chi2 = 132.81, I2 = 96 %) was observed for the duration of operation. In the random effects model analysis using the statistical software Review Manager, statistically the R-IVHR prolonged the duration of operation (Standardized mean difference, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.37, 3.11; z = 5.06; P = 0.00001) but the post-operative complication rate (OR 0.63; 95% CI, 0.30, 1.34; z = 1.20; P = 0.23) as well as the recurrence rate (OR 0.63; 95% CI, 0.14, 2.74; z = 0.62; P = 0.53) were similar. Conclusion R-IVH repair is feasible and safe, but the duration of operation is significantly longer. Major multi-center randomized controlled trial is mandatory to assess the long terms outcomes and cost effectiveness before the routine use of R-IVHR.