Multicenter analysis confirms that a history of multiple previous percutaneous coronary interventions increases in-hospital mortality and the incidence of major adverse cardiac events after subsequent coronary artery bypass grafting. Critical discussion of the treatment strategy in these patients is warranted.
Aims: Previous studies have found a positive association between Helicobacter pylori infection and colorectal adenomas. The aim of the present study was to examine this association while taking possible confounding factors into account. Methods: 98 serum samples were available from 182 patients with colorectal adenomas who entered a case-control study of colorectal adenomas and diet. The H. pylori status in patients was compared with a hospital control group and a population control group. Results: H. pylori IgG antibodies were more common in colorectal polyp patients compared with either control group, the prevalence being 79% in cases compared with 62% in both control groups. The corresponding RR was 1.4 (0.76–2.6) compared with hospital controls and 2.1 (1.1–3.9) compared with population controls. After adjusting for possible confounding variables the association between H. pylori status and adenoma risk was even more marked. There was an RR of 1.6 (0.80–3.4) compared with hospital controls and an RR of 2.6 (1.3–5.4) compared with population controls, the latter association being statistically significant. Conclusion: These findings suggest a statistically significant association between H. pylori infection and colorectal polyps. A possible mechanism might be increased gastrin levels in H. pylori-infected subjects which exhibit a trophic effect on colonic mucosa.
Previous percutaneous coronary intervention before coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with diabetes mellitus and triple-vessel disease independently increases the risk for in-hospital mortality and major adverse cardiac events.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.