No abstract

BackgroundHemostasis is a central issue in laparoscopic surgery. Ultrasonic scissors and bipolar clamps are commonly used, with known advantages with each technique.MethodsThe prototype of new surgical scissors, delivering ultrasonically generated frictional heat energy and bipolar heat energy simultaneously (THUNDERBEAT® [TB]), was compared to ultrasonic scissors (Harmonic ACE® [HA]) and an advanced bipolar device (LigaSure® [LS]) using a pig model. As safety parameters, temperature profiles after single activation and after a defined cut were determined. As efficacy parameters, seal failures and the maximum burst pressure (BP) were measured after in vivo sealing of vessels of various types and diameters (categories 2–4 and 5–7 mm). Moreover, the vertical width of the tissue seal was measured on serial histological slices of selected arteries. The cutting speed was measured during division of isolated arteries and during dissection of a defined length of compound tissue (10 cm of mesentery). Burst-pressure measurement and histological analysis were performed by investigators blinded to the used sealing device.ResultsUsing the TB, the burst pressure in larger arteries was significantly higher (734 ± 64 mmHg) than that of the HA (453 ± 50 mmHg). No differences in the rate of seal failures were observed. The cutting speed of the TB was significantly higher than that of all other devices. Safety evaluation revealed temperatures below 100 °C in the bipolar device. The maximum temperature of the HA and the TB was significantly higher. No relevant differences were observed between the HA and the TB.ConclusionsThe ultrasonic and bipolar technique of the TB has the potential to surpass the dissection speed of ultrasonic devices with the sealing efficacy of bipolar clamps. However, heat production that is comparable to conventional ultrasonic scissors should be minded for clinical use.

We describe a step-by-step protocol for measuring the stable products of the nitric oxide (NO) pathway: nitrite, nitrite plus nitrate and nitrate. This described protocol is easy to apply and is about 50 times more sensitive than the commonly used Griess reaction or commercially available assay kits based on the Griess reaction. It also allows the study of minimal changes in the NO pathway. With this method, it takes about 3 h to analyze the above-mentioned stable products in culture supernatants or in various body fluids, and the method has a sensitive linear range of 0.02-10.0 microM. This restricted linear range suggests that the technique is useful for studying small changes of nitrite and nitrate, rather than for routine diagnostic measurements.

No abstract