The reactivity of NH(2)BH(2) in the presence of ammonia-borane (AB) is investigated using ab initio CCSD(T) simulations to answer the following three questions: How do AB and NH(2)BH(2) react? How do aminoborane species oligomerize apart from catalytic centers? Can the formation of experimentally observed products, especially cyclic N(2)B(2)H(7)-NH(2)BH(3), be explained through the kinetics of NH(2)BH(2) oligomerization in the presence of AB? AB is shown to react with NH(2)BH(2) by the addition of NH(3)-BH(3) across the N=B double bond, generating linear NH(3)BH(2)NH(2)BH(3). This species decomposes by surmounting a reasonable barrier to produce two NH(2)BH(2) and H(2). The generation of additional NH(2)BH(2) from NH(2)BH(2) and AB provides a pathway for autocatalytic NH(2)BH(2) production. The important intermediates along the oligomerization pathway include cyclic (NH(2)BH(2))(2) and linear NH(3)BH(2)NH(2)BH(3), both of which have been observed experimentally. Calculations show cyclic N(2)B(2)H(7)-NH(2)BH(3), an aminoborane analogue of ethylcyclobutane, to be the kinetically preferred stable intermediate resulting from oligomerization of free NH(2)BH(2) over its isomers, cyclic B(2)N(2)H(7)-BH(2)NH(3) and cyclotriborazane, cyclic (NH(2)BH(2))(3). Simulations show cyclotriborazane formation to be kinetically slower than cyclic B(2)N(2)H(7)-NH(2)BH(3) formation and imply that formation of the cyclic species cyclotriborazane and cyclopentaborazane may be catalyzed by binding of NH(2)BH(2) to a catalytic metal center. Routes that may lead to larger noncyclic oligomers are suggested to be kinetically competitive. The highly reactive N=B double bonds of NH(2)BH(2) are shown to be of central importance in understanding aminoborane oligomerization.

Not a bit like his brother: DFT studies show that ammonia–borane dehydrogenations by iridium pincer complexes occur by concerted hydride and proton transfer from ammonia–borane to the catalyst, not through BH activation and subsequent β‐hydride elimination from the nitrogen end, as had been suggested. Such a concerted dehydrogenation pathway does not exist for ethane, which is isoelectronic with ammonia–borane.

Though the recent scientific literature is rife with experimental and theoretical studies on transition-metal (TM)-catalyzed dehydrogenation of ammonia–borane (NH3·BH3) due to its relevance in chemical hydrogen storage, the mechanistic knowledge is mostly restricted to the formation of aminoborane (NH2BH2) after 1 equiv of H2 removal from NH3·BH3. Unfortunately, the chemistry behind the formation of borazine and polyborazylene, which happens only after more than 1 equiv of H2 is released from ammonia–borane in these TM-catalyzed homogeneous reactions, largely remains unknown. In this work we use density functional theory to unravel the curious function of “free NH2BH2”. Initially, free NH2BH2 molecules form oligomers such as cyclotriborazane and B-(cyclodiborazanyl)­aminoborohydride. We show that, through a web of concerted proton and hydride transfer based dehydrogenations of oligomeric intermediates, cycloaddition reactions, and hydroboration steps facilitated by NH2BH2, the development of the polyborazylene framework occurs. The rate-determining free energy barrier for the formation of a polyborazylene template is predicted to be 25.7 kcal/mol at the M05-2X­(SMD)/6-31++G­(d,p)//M05-2X/6-31++G­(d,p) level of theory. The dehydrogenation of BN oligomeric intermediates by NH2BH2 yields NH3·BH3, suggesting for certain catalytic systems that the role of the TM catalyst is limited to the dehydrogenation of NH3·BH3 to maintain optimal amounts of free NH2BH2 in the reaction medium to enable polyborazylene formation. TM catalysts that fail to produce borazine and polyborazylene falter because they rapidly consume NH2BH2 in TM-catalyzed polyaminoborane formation, thus preventing the chain of events triggered by NH2BH2.

Self-assembly of a series of carboxylic acid-functionalized naphthalene diimide (NDI) chromophores with a varying number (n=1-4) of methylene spacers between the NDI ring and the carboxylic acid group has been studied. The derivatives show pronounced aggregation due to the synergistic effects of H-bonding between the carboxylic acid groups in a syn-syn catemer motif and π stacking between the NDI chromophores. Solvent-dependent UV/Vis studies reveal the existence of monomeric dye molecules in a "good" solvent such as chloroform and self-assembly in "bad" solvents such as methylcyclohexane. The propensity of self-assembly is comparable for all samples. Temperature-dependent spectroscopic studies show high thermal stability of the H-bonding-mediated self-assembled structures. In the presence of a protic solvent such as MeOH, self-assembly can be suppressed, suggesting a decisive role of H-bonding, whereas π stacking is more a consequence of than a cause for self-assembly. Syn-syn catemer-type H-bonding is supported by powder XRD studies and the results corroborate well with DFT calculations. The morphology as determined by AFM is found to be dependent on the value of n; with increasing n, the morphology gradually shifts from 2D nanosheets to 1D nanofibers. Emission spectra show sharp emission bands with relatively small Stokes shifts. In addition, a rather broad emission band is observed at longer wavelengths because of the in situ formation of excimer-type species. Due to such a heterogeneous nature, the emission spectrum spans almost the entire red-green-blue region. Depending on the value of n, the ratio of intensities of the two emission bands is changed, which results in a tunable luminescent color. Furthermore, in the case of n=1 and 3, almost pure white light emission is observed. Time-resolved photoluminescence spectra show a very short lifetime (a few picoseconds) of monomeric dye molecules and biexponential decays with longer lifetimes (on the order of nanoseconds) for aggregated species. Current-voltage measurements show electrical conductivity in the range of 10(-4)  S cm(-1) for the aggregated chromophores, which is four orders of magnitude higher than the value for a structurally similar NDI control molecule lacking the H-bonding functionality.

No abstract