Purpose
To evaluate and synthesize the existing evidence on the microbiological and human immune response associated with peri‐implantitis in comparison to healthy implants.
Materials and methods
Three electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were searched in October 2019 to identify clinical studies evaluating the microbiota and the immune response associated with peri‐implantitis. Two reviewers independently screened the studies and used the full text to extract the data. A qualitative synthesis was performed on the extracted data and summary tables were prepared. Due to clinical and methodological heterogeneity among included studies, no meta‐analysis was performed.
Results
Forty studies were included in this review. Of these, 20 studies compared the microbiological profile of peri‐implantitis with healthy implants. Nineteen studies focused on the immune response associated with peri‐implantitis in comparison to healthy implants. Three studies focus on gene polymorphism associated with peri‐implantitis. The most commonly reported bacteria associated with peri‐implantitis were obligate anaerobe Gram‐negative bacteria (OAGNB), asaccharolytic anaerobic Gram‐positive rods (AAGPRs), and other Gram‐positive species. In regard to immune response, the most frequently reported pro‐inflammatory mediators associated with peri‐implantitis were IL‐1β, IL‐6, IL‐17, TNF‐α. Osteolytic mediator, e.g., RANK, RANKL, Wnt5a and proteinase enzymes, MMP‐2, MMP‐9, and Cathepsin‐K were also expressed at higher level in peri‐implantitis sites compared to control.
Conclusions
Peri‐implantitis is associated with complex and different microbiota than healthy implants including bacteria, archaea, fungi, and virus. This difference in the microbiota could provoke higher inflammatory response and osteolytic activity. All of this could contribute to the physiopathology of peri‐implantitis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.