Background: There has been no study of the effect of post end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on intraocular or intracranial pressure during pneumoperitoneum with steep Trendelenburg positioning. We investigated the effects of 5 cmH 2 O of PEEP on intraocular pressure and optic nerve sheath diameter as a surrogate for intracranial pressure in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Methods: Fifty patients scheduled for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy were divided into a zero-PEEP (ZEEP) group and a 5 cmH 2 O of PEEP (PEEP) group. Intraocular pressure, optic nerve sheath diameter, and respiratory and hemodynamic parameters were measured before induction (T0), 10 minutes after induction of general anesthesia in the supine position before CO 2 insufflation (T1), 5 minutes (T2), and 30 minutes (T3) after steep Trendelenburg positioning with pneumoperitoneum, after desufflation of pneumoperitoneum in the supine position (T4), and after 30 minutes in the recovery room postoperatively (T5). Results: There was no significant difference in intraocular pressure or optic nerve sheath diameter between the groups during the study. The partial pressure of arterial oxygen and dynamic lung compliance at T1, T2, T3, and T4 were significantly higher in the PEEP than in the ZEEP group. There was no difference in mean arterial pressure or heart rate between groups at any time. Conclusion: Applying 5 cmH 2 O of PEEP did not increase intraocular pressure or optic nerve sheath diameter during pneumoperitoneum with steep Trendelenburg positioning in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. These results suggest that low PEEP can be safely applied during surgery with pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positioning in patients without preexisting eye disease and brain pathology.

Background: Older people are more vulnerable to hemodynamic instability caused by propofol due to their decreased initial distribution volume and increased sensitivity to propofol. Midazolam or remifentanil can often be coadministered because of their synergistic or additive effects with propofol as well as amnesic properties and the blockade of sympathetic stimulation. However, no study has confirmed the appropriate dose of propofol for loss of consciousness in aged patients when administered with other drugs, including opioids or benzodiazepines. Methods: Patients >65 years scheduled for general anesthesia were enrolled. The patients were randomized into 3 groups using a computer-generated randomization table. Patients in group P (propofol) received only propofol for loss of consciousness, those in group PR (propofol–remifentanil) received remifentanil before propofol, and those in group PMR (propofol–midazolam–remifentanil) received remifentanil and midazolam before propofol. After propofol administration, loss of both eyelash reflex and verbal response represented success. The 95% effective dose of propofol for loss of consciousness in each group, which was the primary outcome, was determined using a modified biased coin up-and-down method. Results: In total, 120 patients were randomized into the 3 groups (n = 40). The 95% effective dose of propofol for loss of consciousness was 1.13, 0.87, and 0.72 mg/kg in groups P, PR, and PMR, respectively. The mean blood pressure (MBP) in group PMR was more significantly decreased before propofol injection ( P = .041) as well as 2 minutes ( P = .005) and 3 minutes after propofol administration ( P <.001), compared with group P, but there were no intergroup differences at other time points. Conclusions: The effective dose of propofol for loss of consciousness in elderly patients could be decreased by 23% and 36% when remifentanil pretreatment was used without and with midazolam, respectively. However, the decrease in MBP was greater with remifentanil and midazolam pretreatment than with propofol alone. These findings suggest that pretreatment with midazolam for propofol infusions with remifentanil in elderly patients should be cautiously used, due to hemodynamic instability during induction.

Background:Propofol is a rapid, efficient hypnotic agent with antiemetic effects. However, a high dosage is related to hemodynamic abnormalities such as hypotension and bradycardia. Pretreatment with remifentanil can decrease injection pain and stabilize hemodynamics during the induction period. Remifentanil or midazolam in combination with propofol can provide synergistic or additive effects during anesthesia induction. However, the hypnotic doses of propofol required in patients who receive pretreatment with remifentanil or midazolam remain unclear.Methods:Patients aged 20 to 50 years who were scheduled to undergo surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomized into 3 groups using a computer-generated randomization table. Patients in Group P (Propofol) received only propofol for loss of consciousness, those in Group PR (Propofol-Remifentanil) received remifentanil prior to propofol, and those in Group PMR (Propofol-Midazolam-Remifentanil) received remifentanil and midazolam prior to propofol. After propofol administration, loss of both the eyelash reflex and verbal response represented success. The 95% effective dose of propofol for loss of consciousness in each group, which was the primary outcome, was determined using a modified biased coin up-and-down method.Results:A total of 124 patients were initially enrolled. Of these, 4 were excluded, and the remaining 120 patients were randomized to each (n = 40) of the 3 groups. The 95% effective dose of propofol for loss of consciousness was 1.74 , 1.38, and 0.92 mg/kg in Groups P, PR, and PMR, respectively. Blood pressure decreased at 2 minutes after propofol administration in all the groups. However, compared with Group P, Groups PR and PMR exhibited a significant decrease in blood pressure.Conclusions:The effective dose of propofol for loss of consciousness could be decreased by 21% and 47% when remifentanil pretreatment was used without and with midazolam, respectively. However, the decrease in blood pressure was greater with pretreatment than sole propofol use. These findings suggest that the combination of remifentanil with or without midazolam may have no benefit on hemodynamic stability during induction using propofol.Trial registration:NCT02536690 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Purpose:Stress during pregnancy is a risk factor for the development of anxiety-related disorders in offspring later in life. The effects of treadmill exercise on anxiety-like behaviors and hippocampal cell proliferation were investigated using rats exposed to prenatal stress.Methods:Exposure of pregnant rats to a hunting dog in an enclosed room was used to induce stress. Anxiety-like behaviors of offspring were evaluated using the elevated plus maze test. Immunohistochemistry for the detection of 5-bromo-2ʹ- deoxyuridine and doublecortin (DCX) in the hippocampal dentate gyrus and 5-hydroxytryptamine 1A receptors (5-HT1A) in the dorsal raphe was conducted. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and tyrosine kinase B (TrkB) levels in the hippocampus were evaluated by western blot analysis.Results:Offspring of maternal rats exposed to stress during pregnancy showed anxiety-like behaviors. Offspring also showed reduced expression of BDNF, TrkB, and DCX in the dentate gyrus, decreased cell proliferation in the hippocampus, and reduced 5-HT1A expression in the dorsal raphe. Postnatal treadmill exercise by offspring, but not maternal exercise during pregnancy, enhanced cell proliferation and expression of these proteins.Conclusions:Postnatal treadmill exercise ameliorated anxiety-like behaviors in offspring of stressed pregnant rats, and the alleviating effect of exercise on these behaviors is hypothesized to result from enhancement of cell proliferation through 5-HT1A activation in offspring rats.

Background and Objectives: We examined the association between the baseline perfusion index (PI) and changes in intraoperative body temperature during general anesthesia. The PI reflects the peripheral perfusion state. The PI may be associated with changes in body temperature during general anesthesia because the degree of redistribution of body heat from the central to the peripheral compartment varies depending on the peripheral perfusion state. Materials and Methods: Thirty-eight patients who underwent brain surgery were enrolled in this study. The baseline PI and body temperature of the patients were measured on entering the operating room. Body temperature was recorded every 15 min after induction of anesthesia using an esophageal temperature probe. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for intraoperative hypothermia. Results: Eighteen patients (47 %) developed hypothermia intraoperatively. The baseline PI was significantly lower among patients in the hypothermia group (1.8 ± 0.7) than among those in the normothermia group (3.0 ± 1.2) (P < 0.001). The baseline PI and body temperature were independently associated with intraoperative hypothermia (PI: odds ratio [OR], 0.270; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.105 - 0.697; P = 0.007, baseline body temperature: OR, 0.061; 95% CI, 0.005–0.743; P = 0.028). Conclusions: This study showed that low baseline PI was the factor most related to the development of intraoperative hypothermia. Future studies should consider the PI as a predictor of intraoperative hypothermia.