From November 1999 to May 2000, analyses of 425 cabbage, 205 water, and 225 environmental sponge samples from four cabbage farms with packing sheds and from two packing sheds in the Rio Grande Valley and Uvalde, Tex., were conducted to determine whether Listeria monocytogenes was present. Samples were tested by the Food and Drug Administration method for the isolation of Listeria spp., and confirmed isolates were DNA fingerprinted by repetitive-element sequence-based polymerase chain reaction (rep-PCR). L monocytogenes was isolated from 3% (26 of 855) of the samples. Twenty of these isolates were obtained from cabbage (7 isolates from farms and 13 from packing sheds). Three isolates were from water samples(two from farms and one from a packing shed), and three were from environmental sponge samples of packing shed surfaces. Rep-PCR-generated fingerprints of 21 of the isolates revealed 18 distinctive banding patterns. Four isolates from environmental sponge samples of conveyor belts and from cabbage samples shared identical banding patterns, suggesting common sources of contamination. These identical environmental isolates suggest that contact with packing shed surfaces may be a source of contamination of cabbage. However, the cabbage samples could have arrived contaminated, since they were not washed.

No abstract

IMPORTANCE Between 4% and 12% of patients undergoing colorectal surgery and receiving enoxaparin, 40 mg per day, have a postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) event. An improved understanding of why "breakthrough" VTE events occur despite guideline-compliant prophylaxis is an important patient safety question. OBJECTIVE To determine the proportion of patients undergoing colorectal surgery who received adequate anticoagulation based on peak anti-factor Xa (aFXa) levels while receiving enoxaparin at 40 mg per day. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial was conducted between February 2017 and July 2018 with 90-day follow-up at a quaternary academic medical center in the Intermountain West and included patients undergoing colorectal surgery who had surgery after receiving general anesthesia, were admitted for at least 3 days, and received enoxaparin, 40 mg once daily. INTERVENTIONS All patients had aFXa levels measured after receiving enoxaparin 40 mg per day. Patients whose aFXa level was out of range entered the trial's interventional arm where real-time enoxaparin dose adjustment and repeated aFXa measurement were performed. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcome: in-range peak aFXa levels (goal range, 0.3-0.5 IU/mL) with enoxaparin, 40 mg per day. Secondary outcomes: (1) in-range trough aFXa levels (goal range, 0.1-0.2 IU/mL) and (2) the proportion of patients with in-range peak aFXa levels from enoxaparin, 40 mg once daily, vs the real-time enoxaparin dose adjustment protocol. RESULTS Over 16 months, 116 patients undergoing colorectal surgery (65 women [56.0%]; 99 white individuals [85.3%], 13 Hispanic or Latino individuals [11.2%], and 4 Pacific Islander individuals [3.5%]; mean [range] age, 52.1 [18-85] years) were enrolled. Among 106 patients (91.4%) whose peak aFXa level was appropriately drawn, 72 (67.9%) received inadequate anticoagulation (aFXa < 0.3 IU/mL) with enoxaparin, 40 mg per day. Weight and peak aFXa levels were inversely correlated (r 2 = 0.38). Forty-seven patients (77%) had a trough aFXa level that was not detectable (ie, most patients had no detectable level of anticoagulation for at least 12 hours per day). Real-time enoxaparin dose adjustment was effective. Patients were significantly more likely to achieve an in-range peak aFXa with real-time dose adjustment as opposed to fixed dosing alone (85.4% vs 29.2%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study supports the finding that most patients undergoing colorectal surgery receive inadequate prophylaxis from enoxaparin, 40 mg once daily. These findings may explain the high rate of "breakthrough" VTE observed in many clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02704052

No abstract

Background: Venous thromboembolism is a life- or limb-threatening complication that occurs in plastic surgery patients. At present, the optimal dose of enoxaparin that balances the risk of venous thromboembolism and the risk of medication-related adverse drug events—specifically, bleeding—remains unknown. Methods: This study compared pharmacodynamic and clinical outcomes, including 90-day venous thromboembolism and 90-day clinically relevant bleeding, between two prospectively performed clinical trials whose sole difference was postoperative anticoagulation strategy. Patients in trial 1 received enoxaparin 40 mg once daily for the duration of inpatient stay, and patients in trial 2 received enoxaparin 40 mg twice daily for the duration of inpatient stay. The study also examined the potential impact of a weight-based twice-daily prophylaxis strategy to achieve in-range anti–factor Xa levels. Results: The study compared 94 patients who received once-daily enoxaparin to 118 patients who received twice-daily enoxaparin. Twice-daily enoxaparin was associated with a significant decrease in 90-day acute venous thromboembolism (0 percent versus 5.3 percent; p = 0.012) and a nonsignificant increase in 90-day clinically relevant bleeding (6.8 percent versus 3.2 percent; p = 0.25). Twice-daily enoxaparin at 0.4 to 0.5 mg/kg may allow an increased proportion of patients to avoid both inadequate anticoagulation and overanticoagulation, based on anti–factor Xa levels. Conclusions: Twice-daily enoxaparin is superior to once-daily enoxaparin for 90-day acute venous thromboembolism risk reduction. Twice-daily enoxaparin may increase clinically relevant bleeding, although observed differences in this study were not significant. Weight-based twice-daily enoxaparin dosing may optimize the risks and benefits of prophylactic anticoagulation after plastic and reconstructive surgery. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.