BackgroundPatients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are known to be at increased risk of infection, particularly if they are taking drugs with immunomodulatory effects. There is a need for more information on the risk of influenza in patients with RA.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was carried out using data gathered from a large US commercial health insurance database (Thomson Reuters Medstat MarketScan) from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2007. Patients were ≥18 years of age, with at least two RA claims diagnoses. The database was scanned for incidence of seasonal influenza and its complications on or up to 30 days after an influenza diagnosis in RA patients and matched controls. Other factors accounted for included medical conditions, use of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), use of biological agents, influenza vaccination and high- or low-dose corticosteroids. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated for influenza and its complications in patients with RA.Results46,030 patients with RA and a matching number of controls had a median age of 57 years. The incidence of influenza was higher in RA patients than in controls (409.33 vs 306.12 cases per 100,000 patient-years), and there was a 2.75-fold increase in incidence of complications in RA. Presence or absence of DMARDs or biologics had no significant effect. The adjusted IRR of influenza was statistically significant in patients aged 60–69 years, and especially among men. A significantly increased rate of influenza complications was observed in women and in both genders combined (but not in men only) when all age groups were combined. In general, the risk of influenza complications was similar in RA patients not receiving DMARDs or biologics to that in all RA patients. Pneumonia rates were significantly higher in women with RA. Rates of stroke/myocardial infarction (MI) were higher in men, although statistical significance was borderline.ConclusionsRA is associated with increased incidence of seasonal influenza and its complications. Gender- and age-specific subgroup data indicate that women generally have a greater rate of complications than men, but that men primarily have an increased rate of stroke and MI complications. Concomitant DMARD or biological use appears not to significantly affect the rate of influenza or its complications.

PURPOSEAgarose macrobeads containing mouse renal adenocarcinoma cells (RMBs) release factors, suppressing the growth of cancer cells and prolonging survival in spontaneous or induced tumor animals, mediated, in part, by increased levels of myocyte-enhancing factor (MEF2D) via EGFR-and AKT-signaling pathways. The primary objective of this study was to determine the safety of RMBs in advanced, treatment-resistant metastatic cancers, and then its efficacy (survival), which is the secondary objective.METHODSThirty-one patients underwent up to four intraperitoneal implantations of RMBs (8 or 16 macrobeads/kg) via laparoscopy in this single-arm trial (FDA BB-IND 10091; NCT 00283075). Serial physical examinations, laboratory testing, and PET-CT imaging were performed before and three months after each implant.RESULTSRMBs were well tolerated at both dose levels (mean 660.9 per implant). AEs were (Grade 1/2) with no treatment-related SAEs.CONCLUSIONThe data support the safety of RMB therapy in advanced-malignancy patients, and the preliminary evidence for their potential efficacy is encouraging. A Phase 2 efficacy trial is ongoing.

e15046 Background: RMB, a cytostatic, biological system form of anti cancer therapy have been used in Ph I & II clinical trials in mCRC w/ evidence of improved survival benefit & QOL. Evaluation of metastatic tumor response by standard CT RECIST criteria however has been unsatisfactory. We hypothesized that using 18F FDG PET/CT scan to evaluate tumor anatomy & metabolism could provide a more accurate picture of tumor response to RMB Methods: 48 mCRC pts (14, Ph 1; 34, Ph 2a) who failed available treatments were implanted intraperitoneally w/ RMB (8mb/kg). Physicals, biomarkers & lab evaluation were obtained at baseline & days 14-90, with PET CT imaging at baseline & day 90. PET scan was acquired 1 hour after FDG injection of 9.4 mCi. CT was used for attenuation correction. Correlation between 18F FDG PET SUVmax findings & CEA & or CA19-9 responses was assessed. Positive response was defined as ≥20% decrease post implant in CEA, CA19-9 & SUV. Only tumors w/ SUVmax ≥ 2.5 were evaluated. SUV measurements were made by 1 radiologist experienced in PET-CT scanning & SUV determination Results: 123 FDG positive mCRC lesions (39, Ph 1; 84 Ph 2a) were detected in 37 evaluable pts (14 m, 23 f; mean age 58.2; SUVmax 2.5-17.5). Of the 37 pts, 28 (76%) showed stabilization & or decreased FDG uptake (4 w/ frank necrosis) as well as stable/decreased CT tumor measurements. Pts w/ pulmonary lesions showed greater responses than those w/ hepatic lesions. 9 (24%) of 37 pts showed increased SUVs. 23 pts (62%) showed decrease in CEA & or CA 19-9 ≥ 20%. 17 pts (74%; 13 decrease, 4 central & peripheral necrosis) had correlation between decreased SUVs/necrosis & biomarkers decrease Conclusions: We conclude SUVs are useful in monitoring mCRC lesions response to RMB therapy. Changes in SUVs correlate w/ CEA & CA 19-9 changes. Taken together the combined data indicate anti tumor effect in these Ph 1/2a trials & offer preliminary support for our hypothesis that 18FDG can be useful in evaluating cell system therapies. Issues of SUVmax standardization & effects of intra tumor heterogeneity however must be considered. Further studies are merited & ongoing, including a planned Ph 3 trial Clinical trial information: NCT01053013; NCT00283075.

572 Background: Peritoneal implantation of mouse renal adenocarcinoma cell-containing (RENCA) Macrobead (MB) represents a cell-system-based approach to the treatment of advanced, mCRC that has been evaluated to date in Phase IIa trials. The data indicate that there are “responders” (R) and “non-responders”(NR) as reflected in overall survival (OS), where “response” is defined as a >20% decrease in either/both CEA or CA19-9 during the first 30 days after MB implantation. We analyzed whether the “response” is due to a post-implant systemic inflammatory response (SIR) or rather a direct inhibitory effect of the MB. Methods: Thirty-four treatment-resistant mCRC patients (pts) were implanted laparoscopically at least once with RENCA MB. Pts were considered R (n=25), or NR (n=9), based on tumor marker responses within the first 30 days. CRP, IL-6, TNF-alpha, and ESR, as measures of SIR, were measured at Day 14 and 30. Results: All 34 pts showed SIR to MB implantation, as indicated by transient rises in CRP, IL-6, TNF-a, and ESR. Baseline CRP values (R, mean 3.24+/-4.39 vs. NR, 2.96+/-3.43; t-test, p=0.86), Day 14 CRP values (R, mean 20.97 +/- 7.21 vs. NR, 14.5+/-8.78; t-test, p=0.04), Day 30 CRP values (R, mean 8.21+/-5.43 vs. NR, 10.76+/-6.92; t-test, p=0.27) and mean changes in IL-6 (baseline p=0.28; Day 14 p=0.36; Day 30 p=0.54), TNF-a (baseline p=0.37; Day 14 p=0.32; Day 30 p=0.29) did not show statistically significant differences between R and NR groups. Conclusions: Data suggest that early tumor marker decreases in R of RENCA MB are likely not due to the induced SIR, but rather a possibly direct anti-tumor-cell effect by factors released by MB. This supports the importance of the MB-induced changes in the MEF-2 pathway in the target colorectal cancer cell/tumor reported previously. Studies of clinical efficacy of MB continue in a Phase IIb clinical trial. Clinical trial information: NCT01053013.