Summary of study A multi-country randomized, placebo-controlled trial of the safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) F-protein nanoparticle vaccine was undertaken in 4,636 pregnant women and their infants. RSV F-protein vaccine was safe and immunogenic in the pregnant women inducing anti-F IgG, palivizumab-competing antibodies and RSV neutralizing antibodies that were transferred to the fetus. Although the primary endpoint of prevention of RSV-specific medically-significant lower respiratory tract infection (MS-LRTI) was not met per protocol criteria for efficacy (i.e. 97.52% lower bound >30%), vaccine efficacy was 39.4% (97.52% CI: -1.0, 63.7%; p=0.0278) in infants 0-90 days age. Furthermore, there was a 58.8% (95% CI 31.9, 75.0%) lower rate of RSV LRTI with severe hypoxemia (secondary endpoint) through to 90 days of age in the expanded intent-to-treat analysis. The number of women needed to be vaccinated to prevent RSV-specific MS-LRTI or LRTI with severe hypoxemia in their infants through to 180 days of life were 88 and 82, respectively. Background RSV is the dominant cause of severe lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in infants, with most severe disease concentrated in younger-age infants. Methods Healthy, pregnant women between 28 and 36 weeks gestation, with expected delivery near the start of the RSV season, were randomized to a single intramuscular dose of nanoparticle RSV F-protein vaccine, or placebo in a 2:1 ratio. Their infants were followed for 180 days for medically-significant LRTI (MS-LRTI), LRTI with severe hypoxemia and/or LRTI- hospitalization. RSV detection was performed centrally by PCR. Safety evaluation continued until 364 days age. Results 4,636 women were randomized, with 4,579 live births. Over the first 90 days of life, efficacy against RSV-MS-LRTI was 39.4% (97.52%CI: -1.0, 63.7%; p=0.0278) and 41.4% (95%CI: 5.3, 61.2%) in the per protocol and expanded intent-to-treat (eITT) analyses, respectively. There was a lower rate (efficacy 58.8%; 95%CI 31.9, 75.0% in eITT analysis; not adjusted for multiplicity) of RSV-LRTI with severe hypoxemia in infants of vaccinees through 90 days age. Pneumonia reported as a serious adverse events was 49.4% less common in infants of vaccinees (2.6%) than placebo-recipients through 364 days age. Conclusions Maternal vaccination with RSV F-nanoparticle vaccine was safe and immunogenic. The prespecified primary endpoint success criterion (efficacy 97.5% lower bound ≥30%) was not achieved. However, maternal immunization was associated with reduced risk of RSV-confirmed MS-LRTI and LRTI with severe hypoxemia in early infancy. Trial Registration Number ClinicalTrials.Gov: NCT02624947. Funding statement Funded by Novavax, with supporting grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Maternal vaccination is an effective means of protecting pregnant women, their fetuses, and infants from vaccine-preventable infections. Despite the availability of sufficient safety data to support the use of vaccines during pregnancy, maternal immunization remains an underutilized method of disease prevention, often because of concerns from both healthcare providers and pregnant women about vaccine safety. Such concerns have been reflected in the low uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine among pregnant women seen in many parts of the world. Here, we present an update of the current recommendations for the use of vaccines during pregnancy, including the evidence supporting the use of novel vaccine platforms. We also provide an overview of the data supporting the use of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy and an update of the status of vaccines that are currently under development for use in pregnant women.

A large number of biologically active components have been found in human milk (HM), and in both human and animal models, studies have provided some evidence suggesting that HM composition can be altered by maternal exposures, subsequently influencing health outcomes for the breastfed child. Evidence varies from the research studies on whether breastfeeding protects the offspring from noncommunicable diseases, including those associated with immunological dysfunction. It has been hypothesized that the conflicting evidence results from HM composition variations, which contain many immune active molecules, oligosaccharides, lactoferrin, and lysozyme in differing concentrations, along with a diverse microbiome. Determining the components that influence infant health outcomes in terms of both short- and long-term sequelae is complicated by a lack of understanding of the environmental factors that modify HM constituents and thereby offspring outcomes. Variations in HM immune and microbial composition (and the differing infantile responses) may in part explain the controversies that are evidenced in studies that aim to evaluate the prevalence of allergy by prolonged and exclusive breastfeeding. HM is a “mixture” of immune active factors, oligosaccharides, and microbes, which all may influence early immunological outcomes. This comprehensive review provides an in-depth overview of existing evidence on the studied relationships between maternal exposures, HM composition, vaccine responses, and immunological outcomes.

Attitudes of pregnant women and healthcare professionals towards clinical trials and routine implementation of antenatal vaccination against respiratory syncytial virus: a multi-centre questionnaire study Wilcox,

BackgroundUptake rates of influenza and pertussis vaccination in pregnancy remain suboptimal.AimTo determine the acceptability of routine vaccination among pregnant women; the confidence of maternity healthcare professionals (HCPs) discussing vaccination; and HCP opinion with regards to the optimum healthcare site for vaccine administration.MethodSeparate questionnaires for pregnant women and maternity HCPs were distributed within four NHS trusts in South England from July 2017–January 2018.ResultsResponses from 314 pregnant women and 204 HCPs (18% obstetricians, 75% midwives [both hospital and community], 7% unidentified) were analysed. Actual/intended uptake of influenza and pertussis vaccination was 78% and 92%, respectively. The commonest reason for declining vaccination was feared side effects for their child. White British women (79%) were significantly more accepting of influenza (odds ratio [OR] 3.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.67 to 6.32) and pertussis vaccination (OR 4.83, 95% CI = 1.77 to 13.19) compared with non-white British women. Among HCPs, 25% were not-at-all or slightly confident discussing vaccination. Obstetricians felt significantly more confident discussing pertussis vaccination than midwives (OR 2.05, 95% CI = 1.02 to 4.12). Among HCPs, 53%, 25%, and 16% thought vaccines should be administered in primary care (general practice), community midwifery, and the hospital setting, respectively.ConclusionMisconceptions exist regarding safety and efficacy of maternal vaccination, and framing information towards safety for the child may increase uptake. Education of HCPs is essential, and vaccine promotion should be incorporated into routine antenatal care, with an emphasis on women from ethnic minorities. Administration of vaccines in primary care may present a logistical barrier to women, however support for alternative sites appears low among HCPs.