Highlights: Large study of encoding and subsequent memory for words, faces, and scenes. Less ipsilateral mesial temporal activity in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE). Extra-mTL activity in mTLE only partly relevant for memory formation. Across materials contralateral mTL decisive to maintain intact memory in mTLE. Left frontal activation correlates with better verbal memory only in left mTLE.
A B S T R A C TPurpose: To investigate the very long-term (i.e., ≥15 years) seizure, cognitive and psycho-social outcomes in resected patients (RP) with TLE compared to control patients not having undergone epilepsy surgery. Methods: We applied a multiple case-study design including three non-resected patients (NRP) who were compared to a group of six RP. The latter were matched to the NRP according to clinical-demographic data. Outcome measures were various seizure, cognitive, and psycho-social variables. Results: Patients were 56-72 years old. Seizure and AED outcome was more favourable among RP. RP reported better self-perceived overall health but higher subjective memory complaints. Upon formal neuropsychological testing, RP presented with lower verbal memory scores. Very long-term memory decline was evident in left-sided RP with good baseline memory scores, while RP with lower baseline performance, right-sided RP and NRP remained stable. Seizure-freedom had remarkable effects on the relationship between objective and subjective outcome: seizure-free patients, in general, subjectively reported the best psychosocial and cognitive outcomeirrespective of neuropsychological test results. Conclusion: Our study suggests positive effects of TLE surgery in the very long-term course of ≥15 years postoperatively. Long-term seizure-freedom appears to have the strongest impact on patients' subjectively perceived psycho-social and cognitive outcome and may even outweigh actual memory disturbances and/or decline. Overall, our data do not support the assumption of a generally accelerated cognitive decline in patients with TLE.
The ability to regulate emotions is indispensable for maintaining psychological health. It heavily relies on frontal lobe functions which are disrupted in frontal lobe epilepsy. Accordingly, emotional dysregulation and use of maladaptive emotion regulation strategies have been reported in frontal lobe epilepsy patients. Therefore, it is of clinical and scientific interest to investigate emotion regulation in frontal lobe epilepsy. We studied neural correlates of upregulating and downregulating emotions toward aversive pictures through reappraisal in 18 frontal lobe epilepsy patients and 17 healthy controls using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Patients tended to report more difficulties with impulse control than controls. On the neural level, patients had diminished activity during upregulation in distributed left‐sided regions, including ventrolateral and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, angular gyrus and anterior temporal gyrus. Patients also showed less activity than controls in the left precuneus for upregulation compared to downregulation. Unlike controls, they displayed no task‐related activity changes in the left amygdala, whereas the right amygdala showed task‐related modulations in both groups. Upregulation‐related activity changes in the left inferior frontal gyrus, insula, orbitofrontal cortex, anterior and posterior cingulate cortex, and precuneus were correlated with questionnaire data on habitual emotion regulation. Our results show that structural or functional impairments in the frontal lobes disrupt neural mechanisms underlying emotion regulation through reappraisal throughout the brain, including posterior regions involved in semantic control. Findings on the amygdala as a major target of emotion regulation are in line with the view that specifically the left amygdala is connected with semantic processing networks.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.