We compare three different approaches to scale clearance (CL) from human hepatocyte and microsome CL(int) (intrinsic CL) for 52 drug compounds. By using the well-stirred model with protein binding included only 11% and 30% of the compounds were predicted within 2-fold and the average absolute fold errors (AAFE) for the predictions were 5.9 and 4.1 for hepatocytes and microsomes, respectively. When predictions were performed without protein binding, 59% of the compounds were predicted within 2-fold using either hepatocytes or microsomes and the AAFE was 2.2 and 2.3, respectively. For hepatocytes and microsomes there were significant correlations (P = 8.7 x 10(-13), R(2) = 0.72; P = 2.8 x 10(-9), R(2) = 0.61) between predicted CL(int in vivo) (obtained from in vitro CL(int)) and measured CL(int in vivo) (obtained using the well-stirred model). When CL was calculated from the regression, 76% and 70% of the compounds were predicted within 2-fold and the AAFE was 1.6 and 1.8 for hepatocytes and microsomes, respectively. We demonstrate that microsomes and hepatocytes are in many cases comparable when scaling of CL is performed from regression. By using the hepatocyte regression, CL for 82% of the compounds in an independent test set (n = 11) were predicted within 2-fold (AAFE 1.4). We suggest that a regression line that adjusts for systematic under-predictions should be the first-hand choice for scaling of CL.
Systematic under-prediction of clearance is frequently associated with in vitro kinetic data when extrapolated using physiological scaling factors, appropriate binding parameters and the well-stirred model. The present study describes a method of removing this systematic bias through application of empirical correction factors derived from regression analyses applied to the in vitro and in vivo data for a defined set of reference compounds. Linear regression lines were established with in vivo intrinsic clearance (CLint), derived from in vivo clearance data and scaled in vitro intrinsic clearance from isolated hepatocyte incubations. The scaled CLint was empirically corrected to a predicted in vivo CLint using the slope and intercept from a uniform weighted linear regression applied to the in vitro to in vivo extrapolation. Cross validation of human data demonstrated that 66% of the reference compounds had a predicted in vivo CLint within two-fold of the observed value. The average absolute fold error (AAFE) for the in vivo CLint predictions was 1.90. For rat, 54% of the compounds had a predicted value within two-fold of the observed and the AAFE was 1.98. Three AstraZeneca projects are used to exemplify how a two-sided prediction interval, applied to the rat regression corrected reference data, can form the basis for assessing the likelihood that, for a given chemical series, the in vitro kinetic data is predictive of in vivo clearance and is therefore appropriate to guide optimisation of compound metabolic stability.
Cryopreserved hepatocytes are often used as a convenient tool in studies of hepatic drug metabolism and disposition. In this study, the expression and activity of drug transporters in human and rat fresh and cryopreserved hepatocytes was investigated. In human cryopreserved hepatocytes, Western blot analysis indicated that protein expression of the drug uptake transporters [human Na + -taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP), human organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs), human organic anion transporters, and human organic cation transporters (OCTs)] was considerably reduced compared with liver tissue. In rat cryopreserved cells, the same trend was observed but to a lesser extent. Several rat transporters were reduced as a result of both isolation and cryopreservation procedures. Immunofluorescence showed that a large portion of remaining human OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 transporters were internalized in human cryopreserved hepatocytes. Measuring uptake activity using known substrates of OATPs, OCTs, and NTCP showed decreased activity in cryopreserved as compared with fresh hepatocytes in both species. The reduced uptake in cryopreserved hepatocytes limited the in vitro metabolism of several AstraZeneca compounds. A retrospective analysis of clearance predictions of AstraZeneca compounds suggested systematic lower clearance predicted using metabolic stability data from human cryopreserved hepatocytes compared with human liver microsomes. This observation is consistent with a loss of drug uptake transporters in cryopreserved hepatocytes. In contrast, the predicted metabolic clearance from fresh rat hepatocytes was consistently higher than those predicted from liver microsomes, consistent with retention of uptake transporters. The uptake transporters, which are decreased in cryopreserved hepatocytes, may be rate-limiting for the metabolism of the compounds and thus be one explanation for underpredictions of in vivo metabolic clearance from cryopreserved hepatocytes.
1. We compared the intrinsic clearance (CL(int)) of a number of substrates in suspensions of fresh and cryopreserved human hepatocytes from seven donors. 2. CL(int) values for a cocktail incubation of phenacetin, diclofenac, diazepam, bufuralol, midazolam, and hydroxycoumarin were 4.9 +/- 3.4, 18 +/- 7.2, 5.1 +/- 4.9, 6.3 +/- 3.3, 9.8 +/- 5.8 and 22 +/- 14 microl min(-1)/10(6) cells, respectively, and they correlated well with corresponding CL(int) values using cryopreserved hepatocytes from 25 different donors. 3. CL(int) values of each cocktail substrate and 20 AstraZeneca new chemical entities were compared in fresh and cryopreserved hepatocytes from the same three donors. There was a statistically significant correlation between CL(int) in fresh and cryopreserved hepatocytes for each of the three livers (p < 0.002) and the geometric mean of the ratio of fresh to cryopreserved CL(int) values was 1.03. 4. In conclusion, the results add further support to the use of cryopreserved human hepatocytes as a screening model for the intrinsic clearance of new chemical entities.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.