Aims/hypothesis 6q24 transient neonatal diabetes mellitus (TNDM) is a rare form of diabetes presenting in the neonatal period that remits during infancy but, in a proportion of cases, recurs in later life. We aim to describe the clinical presentation of 6q24 TNDM in the largest worldwide cohort of patients with defined molecular aetiology, in particular seeking differences in presentation or clinical history between aetiological groups. Methods One-hundred and sixty-three patients with positively diagnosed 6q24 TNDM were ascertained from Europe, the Americas, Asia and Australia. Clinical data from referrals were recorded and stratified by the molecular aetiology of patients. Results 6q24 TNDM patients presented at a modal age of one day, with growth retardation and hyperglycaemia, irrespective of molecular aetiology. There was a positive correlation between age of presentation and gestational age, and a negative correlation between adjusted birthweight SD and age of remission. Congenital anomalies were significantly more frequent in patients with paternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 6 or hypomethylation of multiple imprinted loci defects than in those with 6q24 duplication or isolated hypomethylation defects. Patients with hypomethylation had an excess representation of assisted conception at 15%. Conclusions/interpretation This, the largest case series of 6q24 TNDM published, refines and extends the clinical phenotype of the disorder and confirms its clinical divergence from other monogenic TNDM in addition to identifying previously unreported clinical differences between 6q24 subgroups.

Imprinting disorders are associated with mutations and epimutations affecting imprinted genes, that is those whose expression is restricted by parent of origin. Their diagnosis is challenging for two reasons: firstly, their clinical features, particularly prenatal and postnatal growth disturbance, are heterogeneous and partially overlapping; secondly, their underlying molecular defects include mutation, epimutation, copy number variation, and chromosomal errors, and can be further complicated by somatic mosaicism and multi-locus methylation defects. It is currently unclear to what extent the observed phenotypic heterogeneity reflects the underlying molecular pathophysiology; in particular, the molecular and clinical diversity of multilocus methylation defects remains uncertain. To address these issues we performed comprehensive methylation analysis of imprinted genes in a research cohort of 285 patients with clinical features of imprinting disorders, with or without a positive molecular diagnosis. 20 of 91 patients (22%) with diagnosed epimutations had methylation defects of additional imprinted loci, and the frequency of developmental delay and congenital anomalies was higher among these patients than those with isolated epimutations, indicating that hypomethylation of multiple imprinted loci is associated with increased diversity of clinical presentation. Among 194 patients with clinical features of an imprinting disorder but no molecular diagnosis, we found 15 (8%) with methylation anomalies, including missed and unexpected molecular diagnoses. These observations broaden the phenotypic and epigenetic definitions of imprinting disorders, and show the importance of comprehensive molecular testing for patient diagnosis and management.