Proteomics studies have shown differential expression of numerous proteins in dementias but have rarely led to novel biomarker tests for clinical use. The Marie Curie MIRIADE project is designed to experimentally evaluate development strategies to accelerate the validation and ultimate implementation of novel biomarkers in clinical practice, using proteomics-based biomarker development for main dementias as experimental case studies. We address several knowledge gaps that have been identified in the field. First, there is the technology-translation gap of different technologies for the discovery (e.g., mass spectrometry) and the large-scale validation (e.g., immunoassays) of biomarkers. In addition, there is a limited understanding of conformational states of biomarker proteins in different matrices, which affect the selection of reagents for assay development. In this review, we aim to understand the decisions taken in the initial steps of biomarker development, which is done via an interim narrative update of the work of each ESR subproject. The results describe the decision process to shortlist biomarkers from a proteomics to develop immunoassays or mass spectrometry assays for Alzheimer's disease, Lewy body dementia, and frontotemporal dementia. In addition, we explain the approach to prepare the market implementation of novel biomarkers and assays. Moreover, we describe the development of computational protein state and interaction prediction models to support biomarker development, such as the prediction of epitopes. Lastly, we reflect upon activities involved in the biomarker development process to deduce a best-practice roadmap for biomarker development.

Background Aggregation of α-synuclein (α-syn) is a prominent feature of Parkinson’s disease (PD) and other synucleinopathies. Currently, α-syn seed amplification assays (SAAs) using cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) represent the most promising diagnostic tools for synucleinopathies. However, CSF itself contains several compounds that can modulate the aggregation of α-syn in a patient-dependent manner, potentially undermining unoptimized α-syn SAAs and preventing seed quantification. Methods In this study, we characterized the inhibitory effect of CSF milieu on detection of α-syn aggregates by means of CSF fractionation, mass spectrometry, immunoassays, transmission electron microscopy, solution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, a highly accurate and standardized diagnostic SAA, and different in vitro aggregation conditions to evaluate spontaneous aggregation of α-syn. Results We found the high-molecular weight fraction of CSF (> 100,000 Da) to be highly inhibitory on α-syn aggregation and identified lipoproteins to be the main drivers of this effect. Direct interaction between lipoproteins and monomeric α-syn was not detected by solution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, on the other hand we observed lipoprotein-α-syn complexes by transmission electron microscopy. These observations are compatible with hypothesizing an interaction between lipoproteins and oligomeric/proto-fibrillary α-syn intermediates. We observed significantly slower amplification of α-syn seeds in PD CSF when lipoproteins were added to the reaction mix of diagnostic SAA. Additionally, we observed a decreased inhibition capacity of CSF on α-syn aggregation after immunodepleting ApoA1 and ApoE. Finally, we observed that CSF ApoA1 and ApoE levels significantly correlated with SAA kinetic parameters in n = 31 SAA-negative control CSF samples spiked with preformed α-syn aggregates. Conclusions Our results describe a novel interaction between lipoproteins and α-syn aggregates that inhibits the formation of α-syn fibrils and could have relevant implications. Indeed, the donor-specific inhibition of CSF on α-syn aggregation explains the lack of quantitative results from analysis of SAA-derived kinetic parameters to date. Furthermore, our data show that lipoproteins are the main inhibitory components of CSF, suggesting that lipoprotein concentration measurements could be incorporated into data analysis models to eliminate the confounding effects of CSF milieu on α-syn quantification efforts.

Background Alzheimer’s disease (AD) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) core biomarkers (Aβ42/40 ratio, p-tau, and t-tau) provide high diagnostic accuracy, even at the earliest stage of disease. However, these markers do not fully reflect the complex AD pathophysiology. Recent large scale CSF proteomic studies revealed several new AD candidate biomarkers related to metabolic pathways. In this study we measured the CSF levels of four metabolism-related proteins not directly linked to amyloid- and tau-pathways (i.e., pyruvate kinase, PKM; aldolase, ALDO; ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1, UCHL1, and fatty acid-binding protein 3, FABP3) across the AD continuum. We aimed at validating the potential value of these proteins as new CSF biomarkers for AD and their possible involvement in AD pathogenesis, with specific interest on the preclinical phase of the disease. Methods CSF PKM and ALDO activities were measured with specific enzyme assays while UCHL1 and FABP3 levels were measured with immunoassays in a cohort of patients composed as follows: preclinical AD (pre-AD, n = 19, cognitively unimpaired), mild cognitive impairment due to AD (MCI-AD, n = 50), dementia due to AD (ADdem, n = 45), and patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD, n = 37). Individuals with MCI not due to AD (MCI, n = 30) and subjective cognitive decline (SCD, n = 52) with negative CSF AD-profile, were enrolled as control groups. Results CSF UCHL1 and FABP3 levels, and PKM activity were significantly increased in AD patients, already at the pre-clinical stage. CSF PKM activity was also increased in FTD patients compared with control groups, being similar between AD and FTD patients. No difference was found in ALDO activity among the groups. UCHL1 showed good performance in discriminating early AD patients (pre-AD and MCI-AD) from controls (AUC ~ 0.83), as assessed by ROC analysis. Similar results were obtained for FABP3. Conversely, PKM provided the best performance when comparing FTD vs. MCI (AUC = 0.80). Combination of PKM, FABP3, and UCHL1 improved the diagnostic accuracy for the detection of patients within the AD continuum when compared with single biomarkers. Conclusions Our study confirmed the potential role of UCHL1 and FABP3 as neurodegenerative biomarkers for AD. Furthermore, our results validated the increase of PKM activity in CSF of AD patients, already at the preclinical phase of the disease. Increased PKM activity was observed also in FTD patients, possibly underlining similar alterations in energy metabolism in AD and FTD.

Background and Objectives: Different forms of phosphorylated tau (p-tau) have shown high potential as Alzheimer′s Disease (AD) biomarkers in both cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma. Hence, we hypothesized that tau peptides showing concomitant phosphorylation at two different sites may provide an increased diagnostic value. We therefore developed and validated a new Simoa® immunoassay detecting tau simultaneously phosphorylated at T181 and T231 (C231D181) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma. Methods: Technical validation of the C231D181 Simoa® assay included standard curve development, assessment of antibodies cross-reactivity, dilutional linearity, sensitivity, as well as intra- and inter-assay precision. Subsequently, we measured CSF C231D181, p-tau181, and p-tau231 in two cohorts: discovery (MCI-AD n=21, AD dementia n=19, CTRL n=15) and validation (preclinical AD n=19, MCI-AD n=20, AD dementia n=16, frontotemporal dementia n=39, CTRL n=24). Additionally, in the discovery cohort, C231D181, p-tau181, and p-tau231 levels were measured in matched plasma samples. Results: Specificity of the assay was assessed using a synthetic peptide simultaneously phosphorylated at T181 and T231, while cross-reactivity was excluded with a mix of single-site phosphorylated peptides (T181 or T231). Both in discovery and validation cohorts, CSF C231D181, p-tau181, and p-tau231 levels were significantly elevated in all AD groups vs. CTRL. As assessed in discovery cohort, plasma p-tau231 and p-tau181 levels enabled effective discrimination of AD continuum groups from CTRL (AUC plasma p-tau231: CTRL vs. MCI-AD=0.925, CTRL vs. AD-dem=0.947; AUC plasma p-tau181: CTRL vs. MCI-AD=0.877, CTRL vs. AD-dem=0.943) while plasma C231D181 did not change among clinical groups. Discussion: A new ultrasensitive immunoassay detecting tau simultaneously phosphorylated at T181 and T231 was developed and validated. While we found this phosphorylated tau form to be significantly elevated across the AD continuum in CSF, in plasma it did not show changes among the diagnostic groups. The differences between CSF and plasma suggest matrix-specific protein processing. Our findings support evidence for qualitative and quantitative importance of tau phosphorylation across AD continuum and warrant further investigation, including assessment of tau simultaneously phosphorylated at multiple sites.

Background: Phosphatidylethanolamine binding protein 1 (PEBP1) is a multifunctional protein, mainly known for its specific binding of phosphatidylethanolamine and the ability to suppress the Raf1-MAPK pathway. Its potential role as an Alzheimer’s disease (AD) biomarker has been proposed in several studies. However, evaluation of its discriminative value in clinical cohorts is missing. Objective: We aimed to develop a new immunoassay for the measurement of PEBP1 in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and assess the possible role of this protein as AD biomarker. Methods: We developed a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detection of PEBP1 in CSF and performed a technical and a clinical validation on two well-characterized cohorts. The first cohort included 14 mild cognitive impairment due to AD (MCI-AD) and 11 other neurological diseases (OND) patients. The second, larger cohort, included 25 MCI-AD, 29 AD dementia (AD-dem), and 21 OND patients. Results: PEBP1 is highly sensitive to pre-analytical conditions, especially to prolonged storage at room temperature or 4°C. Analysis of the first cohort showed a trend of an increase of PEBP1 level in MCI-AD patients versus OND subjects. Analysis of the second cohort did not show significant differences among diagnostic groups. Weak, positive correlation was found between CSF PEBP1 and t-tau, p-tau, and Aβ 40 in the AD-dem group. Conclusion: A novel ELISA for the detection of PEBP1 in CSF was developed. Further research is needed to assess the potential of PEBP1 in AD diagnostics. The observed dependence of the PEBP1 signal on operating procedures encourages its potential application as CSF quality control.