SummaryRecombinant human parathyroid hormone (1-34) (rhPTH 1-34), teriparatide (Forsteo in Europe), is a new compound that has been introduced and shown to be successful in the treatment of osteoporosis. The mechanisms of action include a pulsative influence on the RANKL/OPG system resulting in osteoblast activation and increased bone formation by teriparatide. In malignant myeloma there is an imbalance between osteoclast and osteoblast activity with involvement of the RANKL/OPG system among others. We report a case with monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance (MGUS) who developed malignant myeloma after teriparatide treatment and we suggest that in addition to malignant myeloma and smouldering myeloma, MGUS should also be considered contraindicated for teriparatide treatment.
BACKGROUND
A breakthrough in understanding of mechanisms of bone structure regulation has brought about the introduction of the new synthetic recombinant human parathyroid hormone 1-34 (PTH1-34; Teriparatide) in the treatment of osteoporosis. These mechanisms, involving the RANKL, RANK, and osteoprotegerin system, are also known to be involved in malignant myeloma (MM) and tumor and bone metastasis development.We report a case in which MM was found after treatment of osteoporosis with teriparatide. We were unable to demonstrate any direct association between the MM and teriparatide treatment. However, it seemed intriguing that similar mechanisms are activated in the development of MM as those being working during teriparatide treatment.In the view of our case, we propose that MM by examination of serum protein fraction should be searched for prior to treatment with teriparatide as it is an exclusion criterion in teriparatide treatment of secondary osteoporosis. A search for other metastatic diseases prior to teriparatide treatment should eventually also be considered. The theoretical basis for our proposal is discussed.
Objective: In primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) with osteoporosis, bone mineral density (BMD) improves after parathyroidectomy. It is unclear whether combining surgery with postoperative bisphosphonate treatment can further improve bone health.
Design: This randomized, placebo-controlled study compared the effects of surgery alone and surgery combined with zoledronic acid on bone metabolism in PHPT with osteoporosis.
Methods: Fifty-six patients (f/m 47/9, mean age 68.4 years) with PHPT and osteoporosis were randomized 1–3 months after parathyroidectomy to receive a two-year treatment of zoledronic acid or placebo. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bone turnover markers (N-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen, C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen, and alkaline phosphatase) were measured annually during the 2-year follow-up.
Results: Two years after parathyroidectomy, BMD was significantly higher in the zoledronic acid (ZOL) group compared with the placebo (PBO) group at the femoral neck (P = 0.045 for Z-score) and lumbar spine (P = 0.039 and 0.017 for T- and Z-scores, respectively). Bone turnover markers were significantly lower in the ZOL group (P < 0.001 for all markers).
Of the 18 patients who had received bisphosphonates for >1 year before surgery, BMD improved significantly in the ZOL group both in the femoral neck and lumbar spine (N = 10; all P < 0.001–0.01) but in the PBO group only in the lumbar spine (N = 8, P = 0.03), (P= 0.08-0.95 for between-group changes).
Conclusion: BMD increases after parathyroidectomy both with and without zoledronic acid but the increase is significantly higher with postoperative zoledronic acid.
Teriparatide works in clinical practice as well as in clinical trials. Younger subjects benefited more than older patients from teriparatide in the total hip and in the femoral neck. Bisphosphonate pretreatment attenuated teriparatide-induced BMD gain.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.