Objective: Examine relationships among neurodegenerative biomarkers and PD motor and nonmotor symptoms. Background: CSF alpha‐synuclein is decreased in PD versus healthy controls, but whether plasma and saliva alpha‐synuclein differentiate these groups is controversial. Correlations of alpha‐synuclein among biofluids (CSF, plasma, saliva) or biomarkers (eg, beta‐amyloid, tau [total, phosphorylated]) are not fully understood. The relationships of these biomarkers with PD clinical features remain unclear. Methods: BioFIND, a cross‐sectional, observational study, examines clinical and biomarker characteristics in moderate‐advanced PD and matched healthy controls. We compared alpha‐synuclein concentrations across diagnosis, biofluids, and CSF biomarkers. Correlations of CSF biomarkers and MDS‐UPDRS, motor phenotype, MoCA, and rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder questionnaire scores in PD were examined. Results: CSF alpha‐synuclein was lower in PD versus controls (P = .01), controlling for age, gender, and education. Plasma and saliva alpha‐synuclein did not differ between PD and controls, and alpha‐synuclein did not significantly correlate among biofluids. CSF beta‐amyloid1‐42 was lower in PD versus controls (P < .01), and correlated weakly with MoCA recall scores (r = 0.23, P = .02). CSF alpha‐synuclein was lower in the postural instability/gait difficulty phenotype than other motor phenotypes (P < .01). No CSF biomarkers predicted or correlated with total motor or rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder scores. CSF alpha‐synuclein correlated with beta‐amyloid1‐42, total‐tau, and phosphorylated‐tau (r = 0.41, 0.81, 0.43, respectively; Ps < .001). Conclusion: Lower CSF alpha‐synuclein is associated with diagnosis and motor phenotype in moderate‐advanced PD. Plasma and saliva alpha‐synuclein neither correlate with CSF alpha‐synuclein, nor distinguish PD from controls. CSF beta‐amyloid1‐42 remains a potential biomarker for cognitive impairment in PD. © 2017 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

The recent advent of an "ecosystem" of shared biofluid sample biorepositories and data sets will focus biomarker efforts in Parkinson's disease, boosting the therapeutic development pipeline and enabling translation with real-world impact.

Purpose: Genetic testing for Parkinson disease (PD) has not been widely used in clinical practice. In preparation for upcoming precision medicine-designed clinical trials for GBA and LRRK2, we evaluated movement disorders specialists' current practice, knowledge, attitudes, and barriers to genetic testing in PD. Methods: An anonymous questionnaire was sent to movement disorders specialists at 146 Parkinson Study Group (PSG) sites in the United States (n = 131) and Canada (n = 15) to assess their knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing for PD. Results: One hundred seventy-eight (47.6%) PSG clinicians completed the questionnaire. Forty-one percent of respondents had not referred any PD patients for genetic testing in the last year and >80% reported referring fewer than 11 patients over the same period. Most common reasons for not referring for genetic testing included lack of insurance coverage/cost to the patient and lack of perceived utility. On a scale of 0-100, the mean level of comfort in respondents' own ability to genetically counsel PD patients on GBA and LRRK2 was 52 (SD = 28). Sixty percent of clinicians correctly answered all questions about the inheritance and penetrance of GBA and LRRK2 variants. Conclusions: There is an urgent need to increase knowledge and reduce practical barriers to genetic counseling and testing in PD.

Purpose of reviewWith the advent of precision medicine and demand for genomic testing information, we may question whether it is time to offer genetic testing to our patients with Parkinson disease (PD). This review updates the current genetic landscape of PD, describes what genetic testing may offer, provides strategies for evaluating whom to test, and provides resources for the busy clinician.Recent findingsPatients with PD and their relatives, in various settings, have expressed an interest in learning their PD genetic status; however, physicians may be hesitant to widely offer testing due to the perceived low clinical utility of PD genetic test results. The rise of clinical trials available for patients with gene-specific PD and emerging information on genotype-phenotype correlations are starting to shift this discussion about testing.SummaryBy learning more about the various genetic testing options for PD and utility of results for patients and their care, clinicians may become more comfortable with widespread PD genetic testing in the research and clinical setting.