Background: Autologous fat grafting is a dynamic modality used in plastic surgery as an adjunct to improve functional and aesthetic form. However, current practices in fat grafting for soft-tissue augmentation are plagued by tremendous variability in long-term graft retention, resulting in suboptimal outcomes and repetitive procedures. This systematic review identifies and critically appraises the evidence for various enrichment strategies that can be used to augment and improve the viability of fat grafts. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of the Medline and PubMed databases was conducted for animal and human studies published through October of 2017 with multiple search terms related to adipose graft enrichment agents encompassing growth factors, platelet-rich plasma, adipose-derived and bone marrow stem cells, gene therapy, tissue engineering, and other strategies. Data on level of evidence, techniques, complications, and outcomes were collected. Results: A total of 1382 articles were identified, of which 147 met inclusion criteria. The majority of enrichment strategies demonstrated positive benefit for fat graft survival, particularly with growth factors and adipose-derived stem cell enrichment. Platelet-rich plasma and adipose-derived stem cells had the strongest evidence to support efficacy in human studies and may demonstrate a dose-dependent effect. Conclusions: Improved understanding of enrichment strategies contributing to fat graft survival can help to optimize safety and outcomes. Controlled clinical studies are lacking, and future studies should examine factors influencing graft survival through controlled clinical trials in order to establish safety and to obtain consistent outcomes.

Purpose: Lack of physician training contributes to health care disparities for transgender people. The limited generalizability and feasibility of published training approaches lessen their utility in lowering barriers for other institutions to adopt similar training. Methods: All first-year medical students at the Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine (MCASOM) in Minnesota and Arizona received a 1-h lecture introducing key concepts related to transgender people and their health disparities. Students completed a 21-question survey before and after the lecture, and 1 year later. Chi-square likelihood coefficients were used to compare responses between the three time points. Results: Eighty-six of 100 students answered the prelecture survey (86% response rate); 70 the postlecture survey; and 44 the 1-year follow-up survey. Twenty-five (29%) students had prior education in any lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT +) health disparities, but this did not correlate with more favorable attitudes or knowledge. LGBT + students and those with close LGBT + friends had the most favorable attitudes and knowledge. The proportion of students comfortable with caring for transgender people changed significantly (76% self-reported very comfortable prelecture vs. 91% postlecture, p = 0.0073) and remained at 89% 1 year later. The proportion of students comfortable with a transgender patient scenario significantly increased (67% selfreported very comfortable prelecture vs. 87% postlecture, p = 0.032) even when surveyed 1 year later (95% very comfortable, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that a 1-h lecture can increase the proportion of medical students who demonstrate positive attitudes and correct knowledge on transgender patient care for at least a year, and how a survey can gather essential information on student learning needs to guide training development.

Background Disparities in the stage at diagnosis of endometrial cancer (EC) account for a significant proportion of the disparities in morbidity and mortality experienced by vulnerable groups in the USA. Evidence suggests that disparities in timeliness of care and treatment play a significant role in stage at diagnosis. Despite an increase in literature on EC disparities, the issue remains largely unchanged. The objectives of this review will be to synthesize the evidence to identify important remaining research questions and inform future interventions to reduce the disparity in stage at diagnosis of EC in the USA. Methods This scoping review protocol will use the five-step framework developed by Arksey and O’Malley. A literature search will be conducted from January 2000 onwards in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Studies on delays in care of EC will be included if they were published in English and reported findings for the US population. Two reviewers will independently screen all citations, full-text articles, and abstract data. The study methodological quality and bias will be appraised using appropriate tools. A narrative summary of findings will be conducted. Data analysis will involve quantitative (e.g., frequencies) and qualitative (e.g., content and thematic analysis) methods. The literature search, data extraction, and evidence synthesis will be informed by the Pathway to Treatment Model, which divides time to cancer care initiation into appraisal, help-seeking, diagnostic, and pre-treatment intervals. Results will be reported in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Discussion EC disparities research is currently benefitting form a growing expectation that studies have a real impact on disparities. Patient, healthcare, and disease factors impact the amount of time patients spend in different intervals of the Pathway to Treatment Model, so research and interventions aimed at reducing disparities in EC survival should be designed with cognizance to how these factors impact their target population. Reviews on disparities in stage at diagnosis of EC exist but do not provide a comprehensive picture of the pathway to treatment. This review will seek to provide an expanded bedrock of evidence for future studies to build on as they aim to more actively reduce EC disparities. Trial registration Open Science Framework (osf.io/v2zxy).

No abstract