m A is the most abundant internal modification in eukaryotic mRNA. It is introduced by METTL3-METTL14 and tunes mRNA metabolism, impacting cell differentiation and development. Precise transcriptome-wide assignment of m A sites is of utmost importance. However, m A does not interfere with Watson-Crick base pairing, making polymerase-based detection challenging. We developed a chemical biology approach for the precise mapping of methyltransferase (MTase) target sites based on the introduction of a bioorthogonal propargyl group in vitro and in cells. We show that propargyl groups can be introduced enzymatically by wild-type METTL3-METTL14. Reverse transcription terminated up to 65 % at m A sites after bioconjugation and purification, hence enabling detection of METTL3-METTL14 target sites by next generation sequencing. Importantly, we implemented metabolic propargyl labeling of RNA MTase target sites in vivo based on propargyl-l-selenohomocysteine and validated different types of known rRNA methylation sites.

Methylation and demethylation of DNA, RNA and proteins has emerged as a major regulatory mechanism. Studying the function of these modifications would benefit from tools for their site-specific inhibition and timed removal. S-Adenosyl-L-methionine (AdoMet) analogs in combination with methyltransferases (MTases) have proven useful to map or block and release MTase target sites, however their enzymatic generation has been limited to aliphatic groups at the sulfur atom. We engineered a SAM synthetase from Cryptosporidium hominis (PC-ChMAT) for efficient generation of AdoMet analogs with photocaging groups that are not accepted by any WT MAT reported to date. The crystal structure of PC-ChMAT at 1.87 revealed how the photocaged AdoMet analog is accommodated and guided engineering of a thermostable MAT from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii. PC-MATs were compatible with DNA-and RNA-MTases, enabling sequence-specific modification ("writing") of plasmid DNA and light-triggered removal ("erasing").

The mRNA modification N6‐methyladenosine (m6A) is associated with multiple roles in cell function and disease. The methyltransferases METTL3‐METTL14 and METTL16 act as “writers” for different target transcripts and sequence motifs. The modification is perceived by dedicated “reader” and “eraser” proteins, but not by polymerases. We report that METTL3‐14 shows remarkable cosubstrate promiscuity, enabling sequence‐specific internal labeling of RNA without additional guide RNAs. The transfer of ortho‐nitrobenzyl and 6‐nitropiperonyl groups allowed enzymatic photocaging of RNA in the consensus motif, which impaired polymerase‐catalyzed primer extension in a reversible manner. METTL16 was less promiscuous but suitable for chemo‐enzymatic labeling using different types of click chemistry. Since both enzymes act on distinct sequence motifs, their combination allowed orthogonal chemo‐enzymatic modification of different sites in a single RNA.

RNA methylations play a significant regulatory role in diverse biological processes. Although the transcriptome-wide discovery of unknown RNA methylation sites is essential to elucidate their function, the development of a bigger variety of detection approaches is desirable for multiple reasons. Many established detection methods for RNA modifications heavily rely on the specificity of the respective antibodies. Thus, the development of antibody-independent transcriptome-wide methods is beneficial. Even the antibody-independent high-throughput sequencing-based methods are liable to produce false-positive or false-negative results. The development of an independent method for each modification could help validate the detected modification sites. Apart from the transcriptome-wide methods for methylation detection de novo, methods for monitoring the presence of a single methylation at a determined site are also needed. In contrast to the transcriptome-wide detection methods, the techniques used for monitoring purposes need to be cheap, fast and easy to perform. This review considers modern approaches for site-specific detection of methylated nucleotides in RNA. We also discuss the potential of third-generation sequencing methods for direct detection of RNA methylations.

No abstract