Most textile waste is either incinerated or landfilled today, yet, the material could instead be recycled through chemical recycling to new high-quality textiles. A first important step is separation since chemical recycling of textiles requires pure streams. The focus of this paper is on the separation of cotton and PET (poly(ethylene terephthalate), polyester) from mixed textiles, so called polycotton. Polycotton is one of the most common materials in service textiles used in sheets and towels at hospitals and hotels. A straightforward process using 5-15 wt% NaOH in water and temperature in the range between 70 and 90°C for the hydrolysis of PET was evaluated on the lab-scale. In the process, the PET was degraded to terephthalic acid (TPA) and ethylene glycol (EG). Three product streams were generated from the process. First is the cotton; second, the TPA; and, third, the filtrate containing EG and the process chemicals. The end products and the extent of PET degradation were characterized using light microscopy, UV-spectroscopy, and ATR FT-IR spectroscopy, as well as solution and solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Furthermore, the cotton cellulose degradation was evaluated by analyzing the intrinsic viscosity of the cotton cellulose. The findings show that with the addition of a phase transfer catalyst (benzyltributylammonium chloride (BTBAC)), PET hydrolysis in 10% NaOH solution at 90°C can be completed within 40 min. Analysis of the degraded PET with NMR spectroscopy showed that no contaminants remained in the recovered TPA, and that the filtrate mainly contained EG and BTBAC (when added). The yield of the cotton cellulose was high, up to 97%, depending on how long the samples were treated. The findings also showed that the separation can be performed without the phase transfer catalyst; however, this requires longer treatment times, which results in more cellulose degradation.

An alternative crosslinking concept for the insulation of HVDC power cables that uses click chemistry is presented.

In order to explore the reinforcing capabilities of cellulose nanofibrils, composites containing high contents of cellulose nanofibrils were prepared through a combination of water-assisted mixing and compression moulding, the components being a cellulose nanofibril suspension and an aqueous dispersion of the polyolefin copolymer poly(ethylene-co-acrylic acid). The composite samples had dry cellulose nanofibril contents from 10 to 70 vol%. Computed tomography revealed well dispersed cellulose fibril/fibres in the polymer matrix. The highest content of 70 vol% cellulose nanofibrils increased the strength and stiffness of the composites by factors of 3.5 and 21, respectively, while maintaining an elongation at break of about 5%. The strength and strain-at-break of cellulose nanofibril composites were superior to the pulp composites at cellulose contents greater than 20 vol%. The stiffness of the composites reinforced with cellulose nanofibrils was not higher than for that of composites reinforced with cellulose pulp fibres.

We study composites of cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) in an ionomer matrix of poly(ethylene-stat-sodium acrylate) and find that direct cellulose/cellulose interactions in the composite are not a requirement for achieving reinforcement. While isotropic composites only show a slightly enhanced stiffness compared to the neat ionomer, a more substantial increase in Young's modulus by a factor of up to 5 is achieved by uniaxial alignment of the composites through melt spinning. The orientation of CNC in melt-spun composites reduces the probability of cellulose/ cellulose interactions, which suggests that cellulose/polymer interactions must be present that lead to the observed reinforcement. Molecular dynamics simulations confirm strong cellulose/polymer interactions in the form of ionic interactions as well as hydrogen bonding. These cellulose/polymer interactions facilitate efficient stress transfer, leading to the high reinforcing effect of CNC, while cellulose/cellulose interactions play a minor role in the mechanical response of the composite.