BackgroundADHD is a common neurodevelopmental disorder that persists into adulthood. Its symptoms cause impairments in a number of social domains, one of which is employment. We wish to produce a consensus statement on how ADHD affects employment.MethodsThis consensus development conference statement was developed as a result of a joint international meeting held in July 2010. The consensus committee was international in scope (United Kingdom, mainland Europe, United Arab Emirates) and consisted of individuals from a broad range of backgrounds (Psychiatry, Occupational Medicine, Health Economists, Disability Advisors). The objectives of the conference were to discuss some of the occupational impairments adults with ADHD may face and how to address these problems from an inclusive perspective. Furthermore the conference looked at influencing policy and decision making at a political level to address impaired occupational functioning in adults with ADHD and fears around employing people with disabilities in general.ResultsThe consensus was that there were clear weaknesses in the current arrangements in the UK and internationally to address occupational difficulties. More so, Occupational Health was not wholly integrated and used as a means of making positive changes to the workplace, but rather as a superfluous last resort that employers tried to avoid. Furthermore the lack of cross professional collaboration on occupational functioning in adults with ADHD was a significant problem.ConclusionsFuture research needs to concentrate on further investigating occupational functioning in adults with ADHD and pilot exploratory initiatives and tools, leading to a better and more informed understanding of possible barriers to employment and potential schemes to put in place to address these problems.

Treatment burden can adversely affect patient functioning and wellbeing, including their ability work. Workers with multimorbidity, such as ageing, are disproportionately affected and their number is set to rise as the workforce ages. Complex treatment regimens and their sequalae can be a barrier to a successful return to work or even incompatible with work demands. Enlightened employers will seek to accommodate the burden of treatment by implementing reasonable adjustments. However, where the employer is unable or unwilling to accommodate such adjustments, the result may be loss of employment, with often devastating consequences to the worker's physical and emotional health and wellbeing.Collaborative action in three key settings: the healthcare system, the workplace and the state can help reduce barriers, thereby enabling working-age people with chronic health conditions or disabilities remain in, and benefit from, employment.Educational aimsTo raise awareness on how treatment burden can adversely affect health, work and societal outcomes in working age people.To promote good practice in relation to managing treatment burden in healthcare and work settings, so that working age people with chronic health conditions or disabilities can remain in and benefit from work.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract