Successful locomotion through space requires precise estimation of the direction and distance travelled. Previous studies have shown that humans can use velocity information arising from visual, vestibular and somatosensory signals to reproduce passive linear displacements. In the present study we investigated whether also associated auditory velocity cues are used for distance estimation. Subjects had to reproduce (active condition) the distance of a previously seen sequence of simulated linear motion (passive condition) across a ground plane. During both, the passive and active displacement, they heard a tone with a frequency being proportional to the simulated speed (test trials). In some trials the relationship between optical velocity and tone frequency was differently scaled during the active displacements, i.e., the frequency of the tone was either higher or lower than in the passive displacement (catch trials). In test trials, subjects reproduced distances quite accurately. In catch trials, however, subjects' performance was disturbed: when the frequency was lower subjects used higher speeds, resulting in a substantial overshoot of travelled distance, whereas a higher frequency resulted in an undershoot of travelled distance. Our results clearly show that during self-motion tone frequency can be used as a velocity cue and helps to update positional information over time.

Self‐motion induces spontaneous eye movements which serve the purpose of stabilizing the visual image on the retina. Previous studies have mainly focused on their reflexive nature and how the perceptual system disentangles visual flow components caused by eye movements and self‐motion. Here, we investigated the role of eye movements in distance reproduction (path integration). We used bimodal (visual‐auditory)‐simulated self‐motion: visual optic flow was paired with an auditory stimulus whose frequency was scaled with simulated speed. The task of the subjects in each trial was, first, to observe the simulated self‐motion over a certain distance (Encoding phase) and, second, to actively reproduce the observed distance using only visual, only auditory, or bimodal feedback (Reproduction phase). We found that eye positions and eye speeds were strongly correlated between the Encoding and the Reproduction phases. This was the case even when reproduction relied solely on auditory information and thus no visual stimulus was presented. We believe that these correlations are indicative of a contribution of eye movements to path integration.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract