No abstract

Background Tocilizumab blocks pro-inflammatory activity of interleukin-6 (IL-6), involved in pathogenesis of pneumonia the most frequent cause of death in COVID-19 patients. Methods A multicenter, single-arm, hypothesis-driven trial was planned, according to a phase 2 design, to study the effect of tocilizumab on lethality rates at 14 and 30 days (co-primary endpoints, a priori expected rates being 20 and 35%, respectively). A further prospective cohort of patients, consecutively enrolled after the first cohort was accomplished, was used as a secondary validation dataset. The two cohorts were evaluated jointly in an exploratory multivariable logistic regression model to assess prognostic variables on survival. Results In the primary intention-to-treat (ITT) phase 2 population, 180/301 (59.8%) subjects received tocilizumab, and 67 deaths were observed overall. Lethality rates were equal to 18.4% (97.5% CI: 13.6–24.0, P = 0.52) and 22.4% (97.5% CI: 17.2–28.3, P < 0.001) at 14 and 30 days, respectively. Lethality rates were lower in the validation dataset, that included 920 patients. No signal of specific drug toxicity was reported. In the exploratory multivariable logistic regression analysis, older age and lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio negatively affected survival, while the concurrent use of steroids was associated with greater survival. A statistically significant interaction was found between tocilizumab and respiratory support, suggesting that tocilizumab might be more effective in patients not requiring mechanical respiratory support at baseline. Conclusions Tocilizumab reduced lethality rate at 30 days compared with null hypothesis, without significant toxicity. Possibly, this effect could be limited to patients not requiring mechanical respiratory support at baseline. Registration EudraCT (2020-001110-38); clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04317092).

No abstract

Recently, case series studies on patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection reported an association between remdesivir (RDV) administration and incidental bradycardia. However, the phenomenon has not yet been described in detail. We conducted a retrospective case–control study to evaluate the occurrence of RDV‐related bradycardia in patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV2 pneumoniae. We retrospectively evaluated 71 patients, hospitalized in six internal medicine wards of the Milan area, affected by mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who received RDV (RDV group) and 54 controls, matched for sex, age and disease severity on admission (CTR group). The mean heart rate value recorded during the first two days of hospitalization was considered as baseline heart rate (HRb). Heart rate values relative to the 5-days treatment and the 5-days post-treatment were extracted for RDV group, while heart rate values relative to 10 days of hospitalization were considered for the CTR group. ΔHR values were calculated as maximum HR drop versus HRb. Possible associations between ΔHR and clinical-demographic factors were assessed through regression analysis. The RDV group experienced a significantly higher incidence of bradycardia compared to the CTR group (56% vs 33%, OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.2–5.4, p value = 0.011). Moreover, the RDV group showed higher ΔHR values than the CTR group. The HR progressively decreased with daily administration of RDV, reaching the maximun drop on day six (–8.6±1.9 bpm). In RDV group, patients who experienced bradycardia had higher drop in HR, higher alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values at the baseline (bALT) and during the RDV administration period. ΔHR was positively associated with HRb ( β = 0.772, p < 0.001) and bALT ( β = 0.245, p = 0.005). In conclusion, our results confirmed a significant association between RDV administration and development of bradycardia. This effect was proportional to baseline HR and was associated with higher levels of baseline ALT, suggesting a possible interaction between RDV liver metabolism and a vagally-mediated effect on HR due to increased availability of RDV metabolites.