These data, although retrospectively collected, suggest that fludarabine-based chemotherapy is not associated with an increased incidence of infections, in particular IFIs, compared to conventional regimens commonly used for AML induction.
Infections are the major cause of morbidity and mortality of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Invasive Fungal Infections (IFIs) occur in at least 10 to 20% of the patients submitted to induction and consolidation treatments, are responsible for death during induction in up to the 5% of the cases and may cause a delay in consolidation and intensification therapy. Among the risk factors for IFIs it has been included the use of Fludarabine (Fluda), which can induce severe and prolonged immunosuppression. In this study we retrospectively analyzed the infections occurred in 224 newly diagnosed AML patients, aged at least 65 years, consecutively treated with an induction regimen including Fluda, Ara-C and idarubicine with or without etoposide (FLAI/FLAIE). During induction phase, 181/224 (81%) patients experienced a fever of undetermined origin (FUO), the incidence of Gram negative and positive sepsis was 16% (37/224) and 29% (65/224) respectively and 7/224 (3%) patients developed a possible/probable IFI. In 6/224 patients (3%) a proven IFI was found (4 aspergillosis and 2 candidiasis). We then collected the data of the incidence of infections during the first consolidation course (FLAI: n=70; high-dose Ara-C [HD-AC]: n=65; idarubicine and HD-AC: n=89). The overall incidence of FUO was 34% (76/224), the number of Gram negative and positive sepsis was 52/224 (23%) and 49/224 (22%), respectively and 2/224 (1%) patients developed a proven IFI (3 aspergillosis and 1 candidiasis). We subsequently evaluated the incidence of infections in the three different consolidation groups. No significant differences were observed in terms of FUO, Gram positive and negative bacteraemia/sepsis and possible, probable and proven IFIs, during consolidation with Fluda-based regimen and with HD-AC-based regimens. Interestingly, the overall incidence of IFIs during consolidation with FLAI was significantly lower than during consolidation with HD-AC-based treatment program (0% vs 9%; p=0.02). These data, even though retrospectively collected, suggest that Fluda-based chemotherapy is not followed by increased incidence of infections, in particular IFIs, in comparison with conventional non-Fluda based regimens commonly used for AML induction. In our series, Fluda-based consolidation chemotherapy caused a significantly lower incidence of IFIs compared to HD-AC-based consolidation. This may be related to the lower duration of neutropoenia in patients treated with FLAI with respect to those treated with HD-AC/HD-AC + idarubicine.
4848 Objectives: the prognosis of patients with cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML) is highly variable and can be influenced by several clinical and biological variables. Nevertheless, some biological data may be conflicting and difficult to combine with the clinical ones. Methods: in order to propose a simple scoring system, we retrospectively analysed the clinical data of 337 patients newly diagnosed with CN-AMLs, aged less than 65 years, consecutively treated in eleven hematological Italian Centres from 1990 to 2005. Two hundred nineteen patients (65%) received a fludarabine-based induction regimen. All the other patients received a conventional induction regimen, including cytarabine, one anthracycline with or without etoposide. Univariate and multivariate analysis on event free survival and overall survival (EFS and OS) were performed. Patients addressed to allogeneic stem cell transplantation were censored at the time of transplant. Factors found to be significant in univariate analysis were tested in multivariate analysis. A numerical score was derived from the regression coefficients of each independent prognostic variable. The Prognostic Index Score (PIS) for each patient was then calculated by totalling up the score of each independent variable. Patients could thus be stratified into low-risk (score = 0–1), intermediate-risk (score = 2) and high-risk group (score grater than 3). The score obtained in this group of patients (training set) was then tested on 193 patients with newly diagnosed with CN-AMLs, aged less than 65 years, enrolled in the GIMEMA LAM99p clinical trial (validation set). Results: the clinical variables that were independent prognostic factors on EFS in the training set of patients were: age > 50 yrs (regression coefficient: 0.39, HR 1.5, score = 1), secondary AML (regression coefficient: 0.90, HR 2.5, score = 2) and WBC > 20 × 10^9/L (regression coefficient: 0.83, HR 2.3, score = 2). For what concerns the OS, the same variables showed the followings statistical data: age > 50 yrs (regression coefficient: 0.48, HR 1.6, score = 1), secondary AML (regression coefficient: 0.99, HR 2.7, score = 2) and WBC > 20 × 10^ 9/L (regression coefficient: 0.87, HR 2.4, score = 2). In the training set of patients, the median EFS was 22, 12 and 8 months in the low, intermediate and high-risk group (p<0.0001). The median OS was not reached in the low-risk group and was 20 and 10 months in the intermediate and high-risk group (p<0.0001). In the validation set of patients, the median EFS was 66, 16 and 3 months in the low, intermediate and high-risk group (p<0.0001). The median OS was 66, 16 and 4 months in the low, intermediate and high-risk group (p<0.0001). Conclusions: this simple and reproducible prognostic score may be useful for clinical-decision making in newly diagnosed patients with CN-AMLs, aged less than 65 yrs. Moreover, it can be clinically useful when the molecular prognostic markers are lacking (e.g. in emerging laboratories of some developing countries) or give contradictory results. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.