A library of 75 different chimeric cellulosomes was constructed as an extension of our previously described approach for the production of model functional complexes (Fierobe, H.-P., Mechaly, A., Tardif, C., Bé laïch, A., Lamed, R., Shoham, Y., Bé laïch, J.-P., and Bayer, E. A. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 21257-21261), based on the high affinity species-specific cohesin-dockerin interaction. Each complex contained three protein components: (i) a chimeric scaffoldin possessing an optional cellulosebinding module and two cohesins of divergent specificity, and (ii) two cellulases, each bearing a dockerin complementary to one of the divergent cohesins. The activities of the resultant ternary complexes were assayed using different types of cellulose substrates. Organization of cellulolytic enzymes into cellulosome chimeras resulted in characteristically high activities on recalcitrant substrates, whereas the cellulosome chimeras showed little or no advantage over free enzyme systems on tractable substrates. On recalcitrant cellulose, the presence of a cellulose-binding domain on the scaffoldin and enzyme proximity on the resultant complex contributed almost equally to their elevated action on the substrate. For certain enzyme pairs, however, one effect appeared to predominate over the other. The results also indicate that substrate recalcitrance is not necessarily a function of its crystallinity but reflects the overall accessibility of reactive sites.A number of cellulolytic anaerobic microorganisms degrade plant cell wall cellulose by means of macromolecular complexes termed cellulosomes (1-8). In addition to a collection of cellulases, these large complexes can also include enzymes specialized for the degradation of other plant cell wall polymers, such as hemicellulases and pectinases (9, 10). Bacterial cellulosomes are typically composed of a scaffolding protein containing several cohesin domains, which bind to the dockerin domains of the catalytic subunits. The complete dissociation of all known bacterial cellulosomes into individual components requires harsh treatments, such as elevated temperatures and/or the presence of chaotropic agents, thus reflecting the strength of the cohesin-dockerin interaction. In the case of Clostridium cellulolyticum and Clostridium thermocellum, the interaction is Ca 2ϩ -dependent (11, 12) and of high affinity (Ն10 MϪ1 ; see Refs. 11 and 13).The scaffoldins produced by C. cellulolyticum and C. thermocellum contain multiple cohesin domains and a single family 3A cellulose-binding domain (CBD).1 The latter is located at the N terminus of the C. cellulolyticum scaffoldin, whereas the scaffoldin CBD from C. thermocellum adopts an internal position (14, 15). It has been shown for both species that the cohesins can interact with any of the dockerin domains of the same species, suggesting a random incorporation of the catalytic subunits along the scaffoldin (16 -18). The cohesin-dockerin interaction, however, is species-specific, at least between these two clostridia (19).In a previous st...

The cross-species specificity of the cohesin-dockerin interaction, which defines the incorporation of the enzymatic subunits into the cellulosome complex, has been investigated. Cohesin-containing segments from the cellulosomes of two different species, Clostridium thermocellum and Clostridium cellulolyticum, were allowed to interact with cellulosomal (dockerin-containing) enzymes from each species. In both cases, the cohesin domain of one bacterium interacted with enzymes from its own cellulosome in a calcium-dependent manner, but the same cohesin failed to recognize enzymes from the other species. Thus, in the case of these two bacteria, the cohesin-dockerin interaction seems to be species-specific. Based on intra- and cross-species sequence comparisons among the different dockerins together with their known specificities, we tender a prediction as to the amino-acid residues critical to recognition of the cohesins. The suspected residues were narrowed down to only four, which comprise a repeated pair located within the calcium-binding motif of two duplicated sequences, characteristic of the dockerin domain. According to the proposed model, these four residues do not participate in the binding of calcium per se; instead, they appear to serve as recognition codes in promoting interaction with the cohesin surface.

The recombinant form of the cellulase CelF of Clostridium cellulolyticum, tagged by a C-terminal histine tail, was overproduced in Escherichia coli. The fusion protein was purified by affinity chromatography on a Ninitrilotriacetic acid column. The intact form of CelF (M r , 79,000) was rapidly degraded at the C terminus, giving a shorter stable form, called truncated CelF (M r , 71,000). Both the entire and the truncated purified forms degraded amorphous cellulose (k cat ‫؍‬ 42 and 30 min ؊1 , respectively) and microcrystalline cellulose (k cat ‫؍‬ 13 and 10 min ؊1 , respectively). The high ratio of soluble reducing ends to insoluble reducing ends released by truncated CelF from amorphous cellulose showed that CelF is a processive enzyme. Nevertheless, the diversity of the cellodextrins released by truncated CelF from phosphoric acid-swollen cellulose at the beginning of the reaction indicated that the enzyme might randomly hydrolyze ␤-1,4 bonds. This hypothesis was supported by viscosimetric measurements and by the finding that CelF and the endoglucanase CelA are able to degrade some of the same cellulose sites. CelF was therefore called a processive endocellulase. The results of immunoblotting analysis showed that CelF was associated with the cellulosome of C. cellulolyticum. It was identified as one of the three major components of cellulosomes. The ability of the entire form of CelF to interact with CipC, the cellulosome integrating protein, or mini-CipC 1 , a recombinant truncated form of CipC, was monitored by interaction Western blotting (immunoblotting) and by binding assays using a BIAcore biosensor-based analytical system.

The gene coding for CelG, a family 9 cellulase from Clostridium cellulolyticum, was cloned and overexpressed in Escherichia coli. Four different forms of the protein were genetically engineered, purified, and studied: CelGL (the entire form of CelG), CelGcat1 (the catalytic domain of CelG alone), CelGcat2 (CelGcat1 plus 91 amino acids at the beginning of the cellulose binding domain [CBD]), and GST-CBD CelG (the CBD of CelG fused to glutathione S-transferase). The biochemical properties of CelG were compared with those of CelA, an endoglucanase from C. cellulolyticum which was previously studied. CelG, like CelA, was found to have an endo cutting mode of activity on carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) but exhibited greater activity on crystalline substrates (bacterial microcrystalline cellulose and Avicel) than CelA. As observed with CelA, the presence of the nonhydrolytic miniscaffolding protein (miniCipC 1 ) enhanced the activity of CelG on phosphoric acid swollen cellulose (PASC), but to a lesser extent. The absence of the CBD led to the complete inactivation of the enzyme. The abilities of CelG and GST-CBD CelG to bind various substrates were also studied. Although the entire enzyme is able to bind to crystalline cellulose at a limited number of sites, the chimeric protein GST-CBD CelG does not bind to either of the tested substrates (Avicel and PASC). The lack of independence between the two domains and the weak binding to cellulose suggest that this CBD-like domain may play a special role and be either directly or indirectly involved in the catalytic reaction.

Strictly conserved residues within family 5 are described with respect to their catalytic function. The proton donor, Glu170, and the nucleophile, Glu307, are localized on beta strands IV and VII, respectively, and are separated by 5.5 A, as expected for enzymes which retain the configuration of the substrate's anomeric carbon. Structure determination of the catalytic domain of CelCCA allows a comparison with related enzymes belonging to glycosyl hydrolase families 2, 10 and 17, which also display an (alpha/beta)8 fold.