ETW is a clinical condition, which calls for the increased attention of the dental community and is a challenge for the cooperation with other medical specialities.

Tooth-coloured restorative materials are being used increasingly more often in Class II preparations in permanent teeth. Using a practice-based study design, we aimed to assess the survival time of Class II restorations and to identify factors relevant to their longevity. Class II restorations (n = 4,030), consisting of resin composites (81.5%), compomers (12.7%), amalgams (4.6%), and glass-ionomer cement restorations (1.2%), were placed in 1,873 patients with a median age of 15 yr. In total, 92.7% of restorations were placed due to primary caries and 5.8% were replacements. After an average follow-up period of 4.6 yr, 61.6% of the restorations were successful, 11.2% had failed, and 27.2% were not available for evaluation (owing to patient drop-out). The mean annual failure rate was 2.9% for resin-composite restorations and 1.6% for amalgams. For resin-composite restorations, secondary caries was the most common reason for replacement (73.9%), followed by loss (8.0%), fracture (5.3%), and marginal defects (2.4%). Multilevel Cox-regression analyses identified young age of the patient, high previous caries experience, deep cavities, and saucer-shaped preparation technique as predisposing to shorter longevity of resin-composite restorations. One brand of resin composite had a shorter survival time than the others.

The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the protective effect of TiF₄, SnF₂ and NaF (all 0.5 M F) on the development of erosion-like lesions in human dental enamel. Four enamel specimens from each of 6 extracted molars were polished and embedded in epoxy resin. The enamel surfaces of 3 specimens from each tooth were treated with the different fluoride solutions for 2 min. Following fluoride treatments, the specimens were immersed in 0.01 M HCl (pH 2.0), for 2, 4 and 6 min in order to mimic a gastric reflux situation. One specimen from each tooth was used as a control and was only exposed to acid. The etching depths (in micrometres) after 6 min were: TiF₄ 0.8 (SD 0.8), SnF₂ 3.5 (SD 0.7), NaF 5.3 (SD 0.4), and 7.0 (SD 0.3) for the control specimens. Compared to the control, TiF₄ protected the enamel surface from acid attack almost completely (88%), while SnF₂ reduced the etch depth after 6 min by 50% and NaF by 25%.

The aim of this in situ study was to compare the protective effect of TiF₄, SnF₂ and NaF on the development of erosion-like lesions in human enamel. Fourteen human molars were each divided into 4 specimens, mounted on acrylic mouth appliances and worn by 7 volunteers for 9 days. In order to mimic a feasible treatment procedure for patients with voluntary or involuntary gastric reflux, the specimens were etched for 2 min twice a day (0.01 M HCl) and fluoride applications were performed every third day (2 min). The controls were treated as the other specimens except for the fluoride applications. Etch depths and surface roughness changes (R_q) were measured by white light interferometry. Compared with the control, TiF₄ and SnF₂ reduced the etching depth by 100% (p < 0.001) and 91% (p < 0.001), respectively, and both treatments resulted in an observable surface layer. NaF had no significant protective effect (p = 0.46). It can be concluded that although SnF₂ provided significant protection for the enamel surfaces, TiF₄ showed the best protection against acid attack, while NaF had no significant protective effect in this study.

No abstract