Within the striatum, cholinergic interneurons, electrophysiologically identified as tonically active neurons (TANs), represent a relatively homogeneous group in terms of their functional properties. They display typical pause in tonic firing in response to rewarding events which are of crucial importance for reinforcement learning. These responses are uniformly distributed throughout the dorsal striatum (i.e., motor and associative striatum), but it is unknown, at least in monkeys, whether differences in the modulation of TAN activity exist in the ventral striatum (i.e., limbic striatum), a region specialized for processing of motivational information. To address this issue, we examined the activity of dorsal and ventral TANs in two monkeys trained on a Pavlovian conditioning task in which a visual stimulus preceded the delivery of liquid reward by a fixed time interval. We found that the proportion of TANs responding to the stimulus predictive of reward did not vary significantly across regions (58%–80%), whereas the fraction of TANs responding to reward was higher in the limbic striatum (100%) compared to the motor (65%) and associative striatum (52%). By examining TAN modulation at the level of both the population and the individual neurons, we showed that the duration of pause responses to the stimulus and reward was longer in the ventral than in the dorsal striatal regions. Also, the magnitude of the pause was greater in ventral than dorsal striatum for the stimulus predictive of reward but not for the reward itself. We found similar region-specific differences in pause response duration to the stimulus when the timing of reward was less predictable (fixed replaced by variable time interval). Regional variations in the duration and magnitude of the pause response were transferred from the stimulus to reward when reward was delivered in the absence of any predictive stimulus. It therefore appears that ventral TANs exhibit stronger responses to rewarding stimuli, compared to dorsal TANs. The high proportion of responsive neurons, combined with particular response features, support the notion that the ventral TAN system can be driven by specific synaptic inputs arising from afferent sources distinct from those targeting the dorsal TAN system.
There has been considerable progress in recent years towards understanding the neuronal mechanisms mediating time perception. Notably, the striatum and its dopamine (DA) input from the ventral midbrain are considered to be central for timing on the scale of hundreds of milliseconds and seconds. The cholinergic interneurons (ChIs) of the striatum provide an extensive local innervation which closely interacts with striatal DA afferents. Both neuronal systems have been shown to influence synaptic plasticity to shape the transfer of information through the striatum. Given their cooperative role in regulating striatal output pathways, DA and cholinergic inputs may have distinct but complementary roles in timing processes.Electrophysiological recordings from behaving animals have provided evidence that responses of midbrain DA neurons and striatal tonically active neurons (TANs), presumed ChIs, to motivationally relevant events are sensitive to the predicted time of these events. Namely, changes in neuronal activity are reduced or absent at times when events are more expected, indicating that temporal aspects of prediction play an important role in the responsiveness of these two neuronal systems. Recently, new findings have further suggested that DA neurons and cholinergic TANs are both involved in the ability to keep track of elapsed time. These two systems appear to work in parallel in initiating the timing process at the beginning of an interval to be timed. It therefore appears that DA and ChI signaling could participate in striatal processing that is crucial for the control of timing behavior.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.