BackgroundHemostasis and inflammation are both dysregulated in patients with moderate-to-severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Yet, both processes can also be disturbed in patients with other respiratory diseases, and the interactions between coagulation, inflammation, and disease severity specific to COVID-19 are still vague.MethodsHospitalized patients with acute respiratory symptoms and with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2)-positive (COVpos) and SARS-CoV2-negative (COVneg) status were included. We assessed adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-, thrombin receptor activator peptide 6 (TRAP)-, and arachidonic acid (AA)-induced platelet reactivity by impedance aggregometry, as well as leukocyte subtype spectrum and platelet-leukocyte aggregates by flow cytometry and inflammatory cytokines by cytometric bead array.ResultsADP-, TRAP-, and AA-induced platelet reactivity was significantly higher in COVpos than in COVneg patients. Disease severity, assessed by sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, was higher in COVpos than in COVneg patients and again higher in deceased COVpos patients than in surviving COVpos. The SOFA score correlated significantly with the mean platelet volume and TRAP-induced platelet aggregability. A larger percentage of classical and intermediate monocytes, and of CD4pos T cells (TH) aggregated with platelets in COVpos than in COVneg patients. Interleukin (IL)-1 receptor antagonist (RA) and IL-6 levels were higher in COVpos than in COVneg patients and again higher in deceased COVpos patients than in surviving COVpos. IL-1RA and IL-6 levels correlated with the SOFA score in COVpos but not in COVneg patients. In both respiratory disease groups, absolute levels of B-cell-platelet aggregates and NK-cell-platelet aggregates were correlated with ex vivo platelet aggegation upon stimulation with AA and ADP, respectively, indicating a universal, but not a COVID-19-specific mechanism.ConclusionIn moderate-to-severe COVID-19, but not in other respiratory diseases, disease severity was associated with platelet hyperreactivity and a typical inflammatory signature. In addition to a severe inflammatory response, platelet hyperreactivity associated to a worse clinical outcome in patients with COVID-19, pointing to the importance of antithrombotic therapy for reducing disease severity.

Background: Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic liver disease that can lead to liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) is a modern technique for fibrosis assessment. However, data regarding its performance in PBC is sparse. We aimed to characterize severity of liver disease in PBC patients using non-invasive 2D-SWE and the new methods of attenuation imaging (ATI) and shear wave dispersion imaging (SWD).Methods: Twenty two PBC patients were examined with 2D-SWE, SWD and ATI, alongside established non-invasive fibrosis and steatosis assessment methods as well as liver function tests.Results: Median 2D-SWE values were 1.48 m/S (range, 1.14-2.13 m/S) and 6.7 kPa (range, 3.8-14.7 kPa), respectively. Median SWD, ATI, transient elastography (TE) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) values were 13.9 m/S/kHz (range, 11.6-21 m/S/kHz), 0.57 dB/cm/MHz (range, 0.5-0.68 dB/cm/MHz), 7 kPa (range, 3.7-14.6 kPa), and 208 dB/m (range, 107-276 dB/m), respectively. 2D-SWE displayed a significant correlation with spleen length, platelet count, non-invasive fibrosis scores (FIB-4, APRI) and with TE. SWD correlated with alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels, which is a prognostic marker in PBC.Conclusions: Our findings add further evidence that 2D-SWE is a reliable method for fibrosis assessment in PBC. Even though the cohort size was small, the correlation of SWD with the prognostic marker ALP suggests a potentially valuable role of this new non-invasive method in evaluating liver disease activity in PBC.

Background: Clinical practice guidelines for patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) have been recently revised and implemented for well-established response criteria to standard first-line ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) therapy at 12 months after treatment initiation for the early identification of high-risk patients with inadequate treatment responses who may require treatment modification. However, there are only very limited data concerning the real-world clinical management of patients with PBC in Germany. Objective: The aim of this retrospective multicenter study was to evaluate response rates to standard first-line UDCA therapy and subsequent Second-line treatment regimens in a large cohort of well-characterized patients with PBC from 10 independent hepatological referral centers in Germany prior to the introduction of obeticholic acid as a licensed second-line treatment option. Methods: Diagnostic confirmation of PBC, standard first-line UDCA treatment regimens and response rates at 12 months according to Paris-I, Paris-II, and Barcelona criteria, the follow-up cut-off alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≤ 1.67 x upper limit of normal (ULN) and the normalization of bilirubin (bilirubin ≤ 1 × ULN) were retrospectively examined between June 1986 and March 2017. The management and hitherto applied second-line treatment regimens in patients with an inadequate response to UDCA and subsequent response rates at 12 months were also evaluated. Results: Overall, 480 PBC patients were included in this study. The median UDCA dosage was 13.2 mg UDCA/kg bodyweight (BW)/d. Adequate UDCA treatment response rates according to Paris-I, Paris-II, and Barcelona criteria were observed in 91, 71.3, and 61.3% of patients, respectively. In 83.8% of patients, ALP ≤ 1.67 x ULN were achieved. A total of 116 patients (24.2%) showed an inadequate response to UDCA according to at least one criterion. The diverse second-line treatment regimens applied led to significantly higher response rates according to Paris-II (35 vs. 60%, p = 0.005), Barcelona (13 vs. 34%, p = 0.0005), ALP ≤ 1.67 x ULN and bilirubin ≤ 1 x ULN (52.1 vs. 75%, p = 0.002). The addition of bezafibrates appeared to induce the strongest beneficial effect in this cohort (Paris II: 24 vs. 74%, p = 0.004; Barcelona: 50 vs. 84%, p = 0.046; ALP < 1.67x ULN and bilirubin ≤ 1 × ULN: 33 vs. 86%, p = 0.001). Conclusion: Our large retrospective multicenter study confirms high response rates following UDCA first-line standard treatment in patients with PBC and highlights the need for close monitoring and early treatment modification in high-risk patients with an insufficient response to UDCA since early treatment modification significantly increases subsequent response rates of these patients.

Aim Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor type 3‐mediated signaling might be involved in the pathogenesis of chronic inflammatory biliary diseases, such as primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). The aim of the present study was to investigate the prevalence of five well‐characterized specific single‐nucleotide polymorphisms within the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor type 3 gene, CHRM3 (rs11578320, rs6690809, rs6429157, rs7548522, and rs4620530), in patients with PBC and PSC. Patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and healthy individuals served as control cohorts. In the PBC cohort, baseline characteristics and response to ursodeoxycholic acid therapy applying established response criteria at 12 months after the initiation of treatment were evaluated according to the underlying CHRM3 genotype. Methods CHRM3 genotyping was carried out in 306 PBC patients, 205 PSC patients, 208 CHC patients, and 240 healthy controls from two independent German tertiary care university centers in Berlin and Leipzig, Germany. Results CHRM3 rs4620530 proportions in patients with PBC significantly differed from patients with PSC (P = 0.005), CHC (P = 0.009), and healthy controls (P = 0.008), primarily due to a substantial overrepresentation of the T allele in PBC (49.3% in PBC vs. 39.8% in PSC, 35.7% in CHC, and 40% in healthy controls), indicating a potential association of the rs4620530 T allele with PBC (OR 1.461, 95% CI 1.147–1.861, P = 0.002). Further analysis showed no association of CHRM3 single‐nucleotide polymorphism rs4620530 with baseline characteristics and ursodeoxycholic acid treatment response in PBC. Conclusion CHRM3 single‐nucleotide polymorphism rs4620530 might confer an increased genetic risk for the development of PBC.

Background: Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) constitute rare chronic inflammatory biliary diseases which likely comprise genetic, environmental and autoimmune factors. Specific inhibitory (auto-) antibodies against the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor type 3 (mAChR3 auto-ab) may contribute to the pathogenesis of chronic biliary inflammation by modulating mAChR3− mediated signaling. Aims: The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence and relevance of inhibitory mAChR3 auto-ab (mAChR3inh+ auto-ab) in a large cohort of PBC patients from two independent tertiary centers in Berlin and Leipzig in comparison to a large PSC cohort. Baseline parameters and response rates to standard treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) were characterized with respect to the individual mAChR3 auto-ab status. Methods: In total, the study population comprised 437 PBC patients, 187 PSC patients and 80 healthy controls. Clinical and laboratory baseline characteristics were retrieved from medical records. The response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) therapy after 12 months of treatment was available in 176 PBC and 45 PSC patients. Results: The prevalence of mAChR3inh+ auto-ab was significantly higher among PBC patients (11.2%, 49/437; p = 0.008 vs. healthy controls) and PSC patients (33.6%, 63/187; p < 0.0001 vs. healthy controls) compared to healthy controls (2.5%, 2/80), respectively. PBC patients with mAChR3inh+ auto-ab exhibited significantly higher levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and bilirubin, which constitute established parameters for PBC risk stratification. Moreover, mAChR3inh+ PBC patients tended to show decreased response rates to UDCA therapy compared to PBC patients without mAChR3inh+ auto-ab (mAChR3− PBC). In contrast, PSC patients with mAChR3inh+ auto-ab showed no significant differences in laboratory findings compared to mAChR3 auto-ab negative (mAChR3−) PSC patients. Conclusion: MAChR3inh+ auto-ab might be involved in the pathogenesis and treatment response of chronic biliary inflammation in patients with PBC but not in patients with PSC.