The results suggest that the uptake of screening will increase with NIPT. If NIPT will be offered for a broad range of conditions, it is crucial to find a way that facilitates rather than undermines well-informed decision-making.

Pharmacokinetic investigations on Orgaran (Org 10172) have been conducted by monitoring the following biological effects: plasma anti-Xa, anti-IIa and Ila-generation-inhibiting (IlaGI) activities. In addition, a limited number of studies were conducted on the basis of concentrations of the No-affinity glycosaminoglyc(uron)an (NoA-GAG) fraction as determined by a competitive binding assay. In humans, widely different pharmacokinetic profiles for various biological effects were observed, with relatively short elimination half-lives for the anti-IIa and IlaGI activites of 4.3 ± 3.5 and 6.7 ± 3.2 h, respectively, but a relatively long elimination half-life of anti-Xa activity of 24.5 ± 9.6 h. These differences in half-life mainly reflect differences in the rate of elimination of individual components of Orgaran. Rapid elimination of some of these components may explain why twice daily dosing is required for optimal thrombosis prophylaxis with Orgaran. In a comparative study in healthy male volunteers, the pharmacokinetics of the following low molecular weight heparin(oid)s were determined after intravenous administration: Orgaran (3,750 anti-Xa units), Fragmin (5,000 anti-Xa units), Fraxiparine (7,500 IC units) and Clexane (40 mg). Between these products, wide differences in pharmacokinetics were observed. Particularly, the half-lives of anti-Xa activity and IlaGI activity were much longer for Orgaran than for the other products. At the same time, a relatively low area under the curve of anti-IIa activity was observed. The absolute bioavailability of Orgaran following subcutaneous administration was determined on the basis of plasma anti-Xa and IlaGI activities and the NoA-GAG fraction concentrations. Absorption from subcutaneous tissues was found to be close to 100 %, which is significantly higher than of heparin; a finding which indicates that the subcutaneous route is reliable for the administration of Orgaran. The elimination of Orgaran components occurs by renal and possibly non-renal routes. With respect to anti-Xa activity, about 50% of the total clearance can be accounted for by urinary excretion. Therefore, in severe renal failure, a reduction of the maintenance dose of Orgaran would seem to be indicated. Studies on the influence of enzyme induction as a result of treatment with pentobarbital suggest that the pharmacokinetics of Lomoparan are relatively insensitive to changes in hepatic function. In a number of studies, the influence of conditions such as age, body weight and drug interactions were studied. Generally, only minor changes in the pharmacokinetic parameters of Orgaran were observed. It is concluded that the studies on the pharmacokinetics of Orgaran on the basis of its biological effects have been helpful in the development of guidleines for the optimal dosing in thrombosis prophylaxis.

This prospective study demonstrated that there was no difference in the rating of a POP course and a bedside teaching course by students randomly assigned to 1 of 3 different pedagogical approaches. Furthermore, both alternative options achieved better ratings than the standard course, which is current teaching practice in our medical school. The PBT and POP approaches provided superior learning success and POP helped solve the problems of standardisation and patient recruitment.

Although musculoskeletal disorders are the most common reason for general practitioner visits, training did not keep pace. Implementation of learning from patients with rheumatologic disorders linked together with the teaching of theoretical knowledge in the preclinical medical education might be an important step forward in the improvement of quality of care for these patients. The Leiden Medical School curriculum has implemented two non-obligatory real patient learning (RPL) practicals integrated within the preclinical block musculoskeletal disorders. This study investigates the educational effectiveness of the practicals, the expectations students have of RPL, and students’ satisfaction. Participants’ grades on the end-of-block test served as the test results of the educational effectiveness of the practicals and were compared with those of the non-participants. Qualitative data was collected by means of questionnaires generated by focus groups. The participants in practicals scored significantly higher at the end-of-block test. The expected effects of the contact with real patients concerned positive effects on cognition and skills. ‘Contextualizing of the theory’, ‘better memorizing of clinical pictures’, and ‘understanding of the impact of the disease’ were the most frequently mentioned effects of the practicals. Overall, the participants were (very) enthusiastic about this educational format. The RPL practicals integrated within a preclinical block musculoskeletal disorders are a valuable addition to the Leiden medical curriculum. This relatively limited intervention exhibits a strong effect on students’ performance in tests. Future research should be directed towards the long-term effects of this intervention.