This article discusses an under-researched group and provides an analytical overview of the comparative experiences of African, Indian and Coloured doctors at South African universities during the apartheid era. It probes diversity of experience in training and practice as well as gendered differentiation amongst black students before going on to discuss the careers and political activism of black doctors as well as the impact of recent transformational change on their position. It briefly assesses how singular this South African experience was.Keywords: Black Doctor, Racial Discrimination, Apartheid, South
Africa, Medical Training, Medical ProfessionThis article aims to probe the extent of differentiation and diversity of experience for the largely overlooked group of black doctors in training and practice under the apartheid regime and briefly assesses how singular this South African experience was within an international context. The subject of black doctors and apartheid has been underresearched, although it has received minor historiographical attention in institutional histories, 1 institutional reconciliation hearings, 2 specialist studies of black professional
The progressive recommendations of the National Health Service Commission of 1942Á1944 have attracted historical attention but the three and a half million words of evidence given to it have hardly done so. This article reviews this testimony, which gave unrivalled detail on the fragmented state of South Africa's healthcare structures and on the variety of its personnel. In addition it supplied insights into social attitudes and prejudices related to health and medicine in a racially segregated society on the eve of apartheid. The paper analyses the problems that this ground-breaking commission encountered, and explores whether there were 'lions in the way' of its reforms, as was suggested in an encounter with an influential witness. The article probes whether there was a tangential relationship between the evidence, and the commission's conclusions on new health centres as the basis of a radical new national health system. In evaluating whether these reforms were stultified by the election of an apartheid government in 1948 (as others have argued), it concludes that the Gluckman recommendations had already failed before this because they ignored political and professional interest groups. The article also assesses reasons for the contrast between the commission's grandiose recommendations and its modest effects.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.