AIMS OF THE STUDY: Self-harm is a major risk factor for suicide but remains poorly documented. No data on self-harm in French-speaking Switzerland exist. To address this deficiency, the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health commissioned a specific self-harm monitoring programme. We present and discuss its implementation and first findings. METHODS: Every patient aged 18-65 years presenting for self-harm to the emergency departments of the Lausanne and Neuchâtel general hospitals were included in the monitoring programme over a 10-month period (December 2016 to September 2017). Clinicians collected anonymous sociodemographic and clinical data. RESULTS: The sample included 490 patients (54.9% female and 45.1% male) for 554 episodes of self-harm, showing a higher proportion of patients aged 18-34 (49.2%) than older age groups (35-49, 33.7% and 50-65, 17.1%). Patients were mostly single (56.1%) and in problematic socioeconomic situations (65.7%). Self-poisoning was the most commonly used method (58.2%) and was preferred by women (71% of females and 42.5% of males, Fisher's exact test, p <0.001) and the majority of patients (53.3%) had experienced at least one previous episode of self-harm. The self-harm rate was 220 per 100,000 inhabitants in Lausanne and 140 in Neuchâtel. Suicidal intent was clear for 50.6% of the overall sample, unclear for 25.1% and absent for 24.3%. It differed significantly between sites (χ 2 (2) = 9.068, p = 0.011) as Lausanne reported more incidents of unclear intent (27.7% versus 17.4% in Neuchâtel) and Neuchâtel more incidents with absence of intent (33.1% versus 21.3% in Lausanne). In Lausanne, patients more frequently resorted to methods such as jumping from a height (11.4%) and hanging (9%) than in Neuchâtel (1.6% and 4.9%, Fisher's exact test, p = 0.006).CONCLUSIONS: Our results are globally consistent with previous research on self-harm. We found significant intersite differences in methods, suicidal intent and self-harm rates. Our findings highlight the importance of implementing local self-harm monitoring to identify specific at-risk groups and develop targeted preventive intervention.

RationaleTransition in psychiatry refers to the period where young people transit from Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) to Adult Mental Health Services (AMHS). Discontinuity of care during this period is well-documented but little is known about provisions and transition characteristics and policies across Switzerland. The aim of this article is to describe the architecture of public mental health providers in Switzerland and compare it to EU countries.MethodTwo mapping surveys, developed previously for European countries, were adapted and sent to cantonal experts: the adapted European CAMHS Mapping Questionnaire (ECM-Q) assessing the architecture and functioning of CAMHS and the adapted Standardized Assessment Tool for Mental Health Transition (SATMeHT) to map CAMHS-AMHS interface.ResultsData were gathered from six cantons. Activity data and transition policies were comparable between Swiss regions and European countries. The percentage of young people below 19 years who were in care was above 2% in every responding canton with a higher proportion of boys than girls for patients &lt;12 years of age. The transition occurred at the age of 18 years, civil majority, in each canton, and between 0 and 24% (3/7) and 25% and 49% (4/7) of young people were expected to transition. One canton (1/7) benefitted from written guidelines, at the CAMHS level only, regarding transition but none had guidelines for mapping CAMHS/AMHS interface even at the regional level.ConclusionDespite the availability of resources and even if the possibilities of access to care are on average higher than in many European countries, issues regarding transition remain comparable in six Swiss cantons when compared to Europe. Meaning that beyond resources, it is the coordination between services that needs to be worked on. Importantly, implementing those changes would not require investing financial resources but rather working on the coordination between existing teams.

No abstract

Le suicide est la première cause de mortalité chez les adolescents suisses. Une tentative de suicide est souvent l'issue d'un « p rocessus suicidaire » au terme duquel la mort est perçue comme seul moyen d'échapper à une douleur psychique intolérable. Une tentative de suicide comporte un risque important de réitération. AdoASSIP, une thérapie brève adjonctive adaptée pour les adolescents, qui est en cours d'implantation en Suisse, vise spécifiquement à diminuer ce risque. À partir du récit de la tentative de suicide racontée par l'adolescent, patient et thérapeute essayent conjointement de mieux comprendre la « logique » du processus suicidaire. Les besoins clés à court et long termes, ainsi que les signaux d'alerte d'une crise, sont identifiés et un plan de sécurité est élaboré. AdoASSIP est désormais disponible dans les cantons de Genève et Vaud. AdoASSIP, a novel therapeutic tool for the prevention of youth suicideSuicide is the leading cause of death among Swiss adolescents. Often, a suicide attempt is the outcome of a "suicidal process" at the end of which death is perceived as the only means of escaping from intolerable psychic pain. A suicide attempt entails a high risk of repetition. AdoASSIP, a brief adjunctive therapy adapted for adolescents, which is being implemented in Switzerland, specifically aims at reducing that risk. Starting from the story of the suicide attempt told by the adolescent, patient and therapist jointly try to better understand the "logic" of the suicidal process. Short-term and long-term needs, as well as warning-signs of a crisis are identified, and a safety plan is developed.

Le présent article présente un projet de réseau santé-social, en cours de développement sur le territoire genevois de Suisse francophone, réseau au service des jeunes en grandes difficultés et à risque suicidaire. Ce projet, inspiré de modèles français, doit maintenant être mis à l’épreuve d’une dynamique locale très riche en structures institutionnelles et que la problématique suicidaire met bien souvent en crise lorsque le jeune ne peut s’inscrire dans la prise en charge/soin qui lui est proposée. Porté par un comité de pilotage santé-social, ce dispositif maintenant va s’engager dans la pratique pour être ajusté au gré de l’expérience.