Transplantation of PBSCs is associated with more rapid hematologic recovery than is bone marrow transplantation after high-dose chemotherapy for solid tumors or lymphomas. Furthermore, global costs are lower and cost-effectiveness ratios are better with PBSC transplantation.

The RTW process 2 years after cancer diagnosis differed between men and women. A better knowledge of this process should help the national implementation of more cost-effective strategies for managing the RTW of cancer survivors.

BACKGROUND:The optimal intensity of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains uncertain. METHODS: In this centrally randomized phase 2 study, the authors compared 2 different strategies of RIC. In total, 139 patients (median age, 54 years; range, 21-65 years) with hematologic malignancies underwent allo-HSCT from a human leukocyte antigen-identical sibling after conditioning combining fludarabine with either busulfan and rabbit antithymocyte-globulin (BU-rATG) (n ¼ 69) or total body irradiation (TBI) (n ¼ 70). Postgraft immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporin A in all patients with the addition of mycophenolate-mophetil after TBI. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 54 months (range, 26-88 months). One-year overall survival rate was identical in both groups. Four patients experienced graft-failure after TBI. The incidence of grade 2 through 4 acute graft-versus-host-disease was greater after BU-rATG than after TBI (47% vs 27%; P ¼ .01), whereas no difference was observed with chronic graft-versus-host-disease. The BU-rATG group had a higher objective response rate (65% vs 46%; P ¼ .05) and a lower relapse rate (27% vs 54%; P < .01). However, the nonrelapse mortality rate was higher after BU-rATG than after TBI (38% vs 22%; P ¼ .027). At 5 years, the overall and progression-free survival rates were 41% and 29%, respectively, and did not differ statistically between groups. A detrimental effect on some parameters of quality of life was more pronounced after BU-rATG, but recovery was identical in both groups. The mean total cost per patient, including the cost to treat disease progression post-transplantation, did not differ statistically between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Five years after transplantation, the BU-rATG regimen was associated with greater disease control. However, because of the higher nonrelapse mortality rate, this did not translate into better overall or progression-free survival. Cancer 2013;119:602-11.

We report the first randomized study comparing early hospital discharge with standard hospital-based follow-up after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and PBSCT. Patients aged 18-65 years, with an indication of PBSCT for non-leukemic malignant diseases were randomly assigned between two arms. Arm A consisted of early hospital discharge (HDCT during hospitalization, discharge at day 0, home stay with a caregiver, outpatient clinic follow-up). In arm B patients were followed up as inpatients. In total 131 patients were analyzed (66 in arm A and 65 in arm B). Patient characteristics and hematological reconstitution were comparable between the two groups. In arm A, 26 patients were actually discharged early. Patients in group A spent fewer days in hospital (11 vs 12 days, P ¼ 0.006). This strategy resulted in a 6% mean cost reduction per patient when compared with the conventional hospital-based group. The early discharge approach within the French health system, while safe and feasible, is highly dependent on social criteria (caregiver availability and home to hospital distance). It is almost always associated with conventional hospital readmission during the aplasia phase, and limits cost savings when considering the whole population of patients benefiting from HDCT in routine clinical practice.