Hepatic Angiomyolipoma (HAML) is a rare mesenchymal liver tumour assumed to be predominantly benign, although incidental cases with malignant behaviour such as invasive growth, recurrence after resection and metastases have been reported. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the biological behaviour, estimate the risk of HAML related mortality and recommend on a justifiable management strategy. We performed a systematic literature search in Embase, Medline, Web-of-Science, Scopus, Pubmed Publisher, Cochrane and Google Scholar. We included all articles published from inception until March 2016 which reported on follow-up of various treatment strategies. We included 18 articles reporting on 292 patients. Male:female ratio was estimated at 1:3 with gender not reported in 31 cases. Of 292 patients 247 were treated with surgery, including one liver transplant, seven with chemotherapy or Sirolimus, three with embolization, and 35 conservatively. Recurrence after resection was described in 6/247 (2.4%) with pathologically proven HAML resulting in metastases and death in 2/247 (mortality rate 0.8%). Progression was described in 6/35 patients treated conservatively (21.4%). Two of 12 patients with malignant behaviour of HAML had an epithelioid-type HAML, of the remaining 10 histological subtype was undefined. With a risk estimate of 0.8% in surgically treated patients HAML related mortality is very low. Biopsy is indicated when imaging is inconclusive. In case of certain HAML diagnosis on imaging conservative management with annual imaging is justified. Resection should be considered in case of symptoms, inconclusive biopsy or growth in follow-up. K E Y W O R D SHepatic angiomyolipoma, malignant, management, review

Background: Hepatic angiomyolipoma (HAML) may easily be misdiagnosed as a malignancy. The study aim was to assess diagnostic dilemmas, clinical management and outcome of this rare tumor.Methods: This retrospective international multicenter study included all patients with pathologically proven HAML diagnosed between 1997 and 2017. Data on patient characteristics, diagnostic work-up, management and follow-up were analyzed.Results: Thirty-eight patients were included, 32 female. Median age was 56yrs (i.q.r. 43-64) and median HAML-diameter was 57.5 mm (i.q.r. 38.5-95.3). Thirty patients had undergone CT and 27/38 MRI of the liver, diagnostic biopsy was performed in 19/38. Initial diagnosis was incorrect in 15/38 patients, of which 13 were thought to have malignancy. In 84% biopsy resulted in a correct preoperative diagnosis. Twenty-nine patients were managed with surgical resection, 4/38 with surveillance and 3/38 with liver transplantation. Recurrence after resection occurred in two cases. No HAML related deaths or progression to malignancy were documented. Conclusion:HAML diagnosis proved problematic even in hepatobiliary expertise centers. Biopsy is indicated and may provide valuable additional information when HAML diagnosis is considered on cross-sectional imaging, especially when surgical resection imposes a risk of complications. Conservative management with regular imaging follow-up might be justified when biopsy confirms (classic type) HAML.

Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Background: Biliary Cystadenomas (BCA) are considered to be benign but may transform to Biliary Cystadenocarcinomas (BCAC). The aim of this systematic review was to assess the diagnostic work-up and necessity of complete surgical resection. Method: A systematic literature search was performed in Embase.com, Medline (Ovid), Cochrane Central, Web-of-Science and Google Scholar. Articles reporting on diagnostic work-up or outcome of various treatment strategies were included.Results: Fifty-one articles with 1218 patients were included: 971 with BCA and 247 with BCAC. Patients with BCA were more often female (91% vs 63.8%, p < 0.001). On radiologic imaging BCAC more often had calcifications (p = 0.008), mural nodules (p < 0.001) and wall enhancement (p < 0.001). Reported treatment strategies were resection, enucleation, or fenestration/marsupialization. Recurrence was reported in 5.4% after resection for BCA and 4.8% after resection for BCAC. Recurrence after fenestration/marsupialization varied from 81.6% to 100% for both BCA as BCAC. Mortality rate was 0 in patients with BCA and 24% in BCAC. Conclusion:Due to the difficulty in accurately diagnosing these biliary cystic lesions and the availability of different surgical approaches, patients with suspected BCA or BCAC should be treated in a center specialized in liver surgery with state-of-the-art imaging and all surgical techniques to prevent mismanagement of this rare disease.