In piglets we tested the applicability of digital video microscopy and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for non-invasive assessments of limbal and bulbar conjunctival microcirculation.
A priori
we postulated that the metabolic rate is higher in limbal as compared to bulbar conjunctiva, and that this difference is reflected in microvascular structure or function between the two locations. Two study sites, Oslo University Hospital (OUH), Norway and Cleveland Clinic (CC), USA, used the same video microscopy and spectroscopy techniques to record limbal and bulbar microcirculation in sleeping piglets. All recordings were analyzed with custom-made software to quantify functional capillary density, capillary flow velocity and microvascular oxygen saturation in measuring volumes of approximately 0.1 mm
3
. The functional capillary density was higher in limbus than in bulbar conjunctiva at both study sites (OUH: 18.1 ± 2.9 versus 12.2 ± 2.9 crossings per mm line, p < 0.01; CC: 11.3 ± 3.0 versus 7.1 ± 2.8 crossings per mm line, p < 0.01). Median categorial capillary blood flow velocity was higher in bulbar as compared with limbal recordings (CC: 3 (1–3) versus 1 (0–3), p < 0.01). Conjunctival microvascular oxygen saturation was 88 ± 5.9% in OUH versus 94 ± 7.5% in CC piglets.
Non-invasive digital video microscopy and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy can be used to obtain data from conjunctival microcirculation in piglets. Limbal conjunctival microcirculation has a larger capacity for oxygen delivery as compared with bulbar conjunctiva.
Objective
Clinical assessments and laser Doppler perfusion measurements (LDPM) of skin microcirculation have limited value, as they fail to capture events regulated by local metabolic needs at a papillary capillary level. This study aimed to examine the ability of computer‐assisted video microscopy (CAVM) and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) to assess skin nutritive perfusion—compared to LDPM.
Methods
Healthy volunteers (n = 10) were examined after (≈1 and ≈24 h) an incision (5 × 1 mm) on the forearm, at 0.1 mm (only with CAVM), 2−3 mm, and 30 mm from the trauma.
Results
No changes were detected by CAVM after ≈1 h. After ≈24 h, 0−1 mm from the trauma, both CAVM parameters were increased: functional capillary density (capillary crossings/mm, 11.8 ± 1.4 vs. 7.3 ± 1.2, p < .01) and capillary flow velocities (CFV, %capillaries with brisk flow, 10 ± 6.8 vs. 1 ± 1, p < .01). At a distance of 2−3 mm, only CFV was increased (6.2 ± 6.1 vs. 1 ± 1, p < .05). DRS and LDPM measurements increased 2−3 mm from the trauma line in relation to baseline after both ≈1 and ≈24 h, that is, with DRS (%microvascular oxygen saturation): 45.8 ± 7.4% (baseline), 70.0 ± 12.5% (≈1 h), and 73.1 ± 10.4% (≈24 h), p < .01 and with LDPM (a.u.): 7.2 ± 2.5 (baseline), 28.3 ± 18.7 (≈1 h), and 45.9 ± 16.3 (≈24 h), p < .01.
Conclusions
≈24 h after skin trauma, an increased function of the nutritive papillary capillaries can be detected by CAVM.
Background: Non-pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may induce microvascular dysregulation. In piglets, we compared ocular surface microcirculation during pulsatile versus continuous flow (CF) bypass.Methods: Ocular surface microcirculation in small tissue volumes (~0.1 mm 3 ) at limbus (high metabolic rate) and bulbar conjunctiva (low metabolic rate) was examined in a porcine model using computer assisted video microscopy and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, before and after 3 and 6 h of pulsatile (n = 5 piglets) or CF (n = 3 piglets) CPB. Functional capillary density, capillary flow velocity and microvascular oxygen saturation were quantified.Results: At limbus, velocities improved with pulsatility (p < 0.01) and deteriorated with CF (p < 0.01). In bulbar conjunctiva, velocities were severely reduced with CF (p < 0.01), accompanied by an increase in capillary density (p < 0.01).Microvascular oxygen saturation decreased in both groups.
Conclusion:Ocular surface capillary densities and flow patterns are better preserved with pulsatile versus CF during 6 h of CPB in sleeping piglets.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.